《哥本哈根协议》的国际法解析
作者:

An Analysis on the “Copenhagen Accord” from the Perspective of International Law
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • | |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    旨在为《京都议定书》2012年第一期承诺到期后的全球温室气体减排签署新协议的哥本哈根气候峰会在达成了一份不具法律约束力的《哥本哈根协议》后落幕。《哥本哈根协议》坚持了“共同但有区别的责任”原则和“双轨制”的谈判机制,就全球升温上限、资金、技术以及透明度等问题做出了原则性的规定,其制度框架为进一步开展全球气候变化谈判开创了一个新起点。由于协议的形成机制、实体内容和制度约束力等方面存在着一定的法律局限性,因此,如何将协议中的政治意愿变成具有法律约束力的权利与义务将成为后续谈判中面临的最大挑战。

    Abstract:

    Copenhagen Climate Summit which was designed to sign a new agreement on the future global action to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases after the expiry of the first commitment phase of “Kyoto Protocol” in 2012 , ending up with a nonlegally binding document named “Copenhagen Accord” The provisions in “Copenhagen Accord” about the limit of global warming,fund,technology and the issue of transparency which were based on the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” and the “twintrack” negotiating mode provide a starting point for the further negotiations The “Copenhagen Accord” has legal limitations on the procedure , the content and the legal effect of the accord itself Therefore, how to turn the political will in “Copenhagen Accord” to legally binding rights and obligations has become the biggest challenge in the followup negotiations

    参考文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

曾文革.《哥本哈根协议》的国际法解析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2010,16(1):24-30.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:3368
  • 下载次数: 2100
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-08
文章二维码