“欠债偿命”的逻辑悖论与刑法危机
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“经济赔偿在死刑执行类别选择中影响量子的实证分析与理论研究”(13BFX073);司法部课题项目“民间融资刑法规制的效果评估及立法建议”(12SFB2023);西南政法大学重点课题项目“刑民交叉案件法律规制路径之反思与重构——以民间借贷为例”(2013XZYJS002)


On the Logical Paradox of “Debt for Life” and Criminal Law Crisis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    “杀人偿命、欠债还钱”的古老格言早已划定了中国死刑适用范围,然而刑法“重刑主义”的毒瘤使集资诈骗罪依然保留了死刑规定,如此泛滥的死刑规定导致难以克服的立法与司法的双重逻辑悖论。刑法作为社会自身的一种存在方式,用之不当会造成新的恶害。因此,对集资诈骗罪过多适用死刑判决将不可避免地使刑法产生空前危机,尤其是突破了主客观相统一的量刑规则,荡涤了刑法谦抑性,使刑法沦为国家强制推行其意志的暴力工具。虽然现阶段全面废除死刑的条件尚未成熟,但是通过对行为人剥夺人身自由和既得利益等措施足以有效地遏制非法集资案件的发生,因而并不妨碍废除集资诈骗罪的死刑规定。

    Abstract:

    “Sharenchangming, Qianzhaihuanqian”, the old adage has delineated the scope of China’s death penalty, but the cancer “severe punishment” criminal law of the crime of fraud still retains the death penalty, this flood of the death penalty in legislation and judicature doubles paradox difficult to overcome. The criminal law as a way of existence for the society itself, improper use will cause new evil, so the fraud crime suitable for the death penalty will inevitably make the criminal law has an unprecedented crisis, especially breaking the unity of subjective and objective rules of sentencing, cleaning up the modesty of criminal law, and the criminal law becomes the mandatory tools of violence of country’s will. Although the condition is not yet mature to completely abolish the death penalty at this stage, but the behavior of human deprivation of personal liberty and vested interest and other measures can effectively curb the occurrence of illegal fund-raising case, so it does not prevent the abolition of crime of fraud of the death penalty.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

姚万勤.“欠债偿命”的逻辑悖论与刑法危机[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2015,21(2):122-128. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2015.02.017

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-03-03
  • 出版日期: