住房保障制度中实物补贴和货币补贴的效率分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


An economic analysis of physical subsidy and monetary subsidy of China’s government housing security system
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    住房保障制度中对受保障群体往往采取实物补贴、货币补贴和两者相结合等三种主要方式。住房保障的理论模型说明实物补贴限制了人们的选择范围,减弱了住房保障制度的适应弹性;增加了政府行政管理成本;推动住房空置量增加;不利于引入市场竞争机制,资源使用效率低下。相对而言,货币补贴具有更强的效率特征,可以有效地解决甄别、监督和管理的困难,节约政府直接进行实物分配的行政管理成本,同时不存在干扰市场竞争机制的负面效应,有利于提高公共资金的使用效能。

    Abstract:

    There are usually three subsidy ways in housing security system,namely, physical subsidy, monetary subsidy and combination of both. Theoretical model shows physical subsidy limits people’s choices, weakens the flexibility to adapt to the housing security system, increases government administrative costs, increases housing vacancy, and is not conducive to the introduction of market competition mechanism and inefficient use of resources. In contrast, currency subsidies have stronger efficiency features, can effectively solve the difficulty of screening, monitoring and management, significantly save government administrative costs in direct physical distribution, meanwhile the negative effects of interference in market competition mechanism do not exist,and are in favor of enhancing the effectiveness of the use of public funds.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙斌艺.住房保障制度中实物补贴和货币补贴的效率分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2015,21(6):86-92. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2015.06.009

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-12-31
  • 出版日期: