论污染环境罪主观面的修正构成解释和适用——兼评2013“两高”对污染环境罪的司法解释
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


On amended constitution to interpretation and application of subjective side of the crime of polluting the environment and a review of judicial interpretation of the crime of polluting the environment by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate in 2013
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2011年通过的《刑法修正案(八)》将重大环境污染事故罪修正为污染环境罪,2013年"两高"发布对污染环境罪的司法解释,二者的出台对于打击环境犯罪具有重要意义。但是,有关本罪主观罪过、共犯形成、严格责任等方面的评价、认定与适用仍是问题。从本罪的罪状描述和司法解释看,本罪的罪过形式应同时包括故意和过失,污染环境共同过失犯罪有其存在的法理依据和现实需要,同时在本罪中适用严格责任也是中国刑法应予采纳的。

    Abstract:

    Major environmental pollution accident crime was revised to crime of polluting environment by the Eighth Amendment of China's Criminal Law passed. The judicial interpretation of environmental pollution crime was issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate in 2013. It is of great significance to combat environmental crime for the promulgation of both. However, it's still problems for judging from subjective fault, the formation of joint offence, and application of strict liability about crime of polluting environment. From the description of facts about a crime and the judicial of crime of polluting environment, the subjective fault of crime of polluting environment should include intent and negligence. Joint negligent crime of polluting environment has its existing legal basis and practical needs. Simultaneously, strict liability applied in crime of polluting environment should be adopted by China's Criminal Law.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

秦鹏,李国庆.论污染环境罪主观面的修正构成解释和适用——兼评2013“两高”对污染环境罪的司法解释[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(2):152-159. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2016.02.018

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-07
  • 出版日期: