高管政治关系影响民营企业绩效的作用机理研究——制度嵌入视角
作者:
基金项目:

山东省软科学一般项目(2013RKB01313);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA630109);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272119)


The mechanism of executives' political relations on enterprise performance in the private enterprises from the perspective of embedded systems
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    高管的政治关系作为一种重要的替代机制,在市场机制不太健全的环境下发挥的作用越来越显著。文章立足制度嵌入的视角对高管政治关系影响民营企业绩效的作用机理进行分析,并认为制度环境是民营企业内影响、促进高管政治关系发展的关键和主导变量,高管政治关系以企业行为(企业融资行为、企业纳税行为、企业成长行为等)为中介作用于企业短期绩效和长期绩效。

    Abstract:

    As an important alternative mechanism, executives' political relations play an more significant role in the market mechanism which is not sound. This paper analyzes the mechanism which executives' political relations affect the performance of private enterprises from the perspective of embedded systems. The institutional environment is the key and dominant variables to affect and promote executives' political relations in the private enterprises. Executives' political relations have effect on the short-term performance and long-term corporate performance by the corporate behavior, such as enterprise financing behavior, enterprise tax behavior, enterprise growth behavior, etc., as intermediary role.

    参考文献
    [1] 田学斌.文化的力量[M].北京:新华出版社,2015:72-74.
    [2] 李维安,徐业坤.政治关联形式、制度环境与民营企业生产率[J].管理科学,2012,25(2):1-12.
    [3] LI H Y, ZHANG Y. The role of managerial political networking and functional experience in new venture performance:Evidence from China's transition economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(4):791-804.
    [4] 余明贵,潘红波.政治关系、制度环境与民营企业银行贷款[J].管理世界,2008(8):9-21.
    [5] FACCIO M, MASULIS R W. Political connections and corporate bailouts[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(6):2597-2635.
    [6] FACCIO M. Differences between politically connected and non-connected firms:A cross country analysis[J]. Financial Management, 2010, 39(3):905-928.
    [7] 孙晶.政治关联、多元化战略与企业成长性[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2012.
    [8] 魏江,寿柯炎,冯军政.高管政治关联、市场发育程度与企业并购战略[J].科学学研究,2013,31(6):856-863.
    [9] 罗党论,刘晓龙.政治关系、进入壁垒与企业绩效[J].管理世界,2009(5):97-106.
    [10] GOLDMAN, EITAN. Do politically connected boards affect firm value[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(6):2331-2360.
    [11] 贺小刚,张远飞,连燕玲,吕斐斐.政治关联与企业价值——民营企业与国有企业的比较分析[J].中国工业经济,2013(1):103-115.
    [12] MICHAEL C, GULEN. Corporate political contributions and stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(2):687-724.
    [13] LIN H B. Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2006, 44(3):559-578.
    [14] CLAESSENS. Political connections and preferential access to finance:The role of campaign contributions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008, 88(3):554-580.
    [15] SAPIENZA P. The Effect of Governance Ownership on Bank Lending[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 72(2):357-384.
    [16] KHWAJA A,MIAN A. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120(4):401-411.
    [17] CHARUMILIND C, KALI R. Connected lending:Thailand before the financial crisis[J]. Journal of Business, 2007, 79(1):181-217.
    [18] 李维安,邱艾超.公司治理研究的新进展:国际趋势与中国模式[J].南开经济评论,2010,13(6):13-24.
    [19] 罗炜,饶品贵.盈余质量、制度环境与投行变更[J].管理世界,2010(3):140-149.
    [20] 吴水亭,徐扬.发行管制下政治关系对民企再融资择时行为的影响[J].系统工程,2010,28(2):55-62.
    [21] 连军,刘星,杨晋渝.政治联系、银行贷款与公司价值[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(2):48-57.
    [22] 何镜清,李善民.民营企业家的政治关联、贷款融资与公司价值[J].财经科学,2013(1):83-91.
    [23] MOBARAK A M, PURBASARI D P. Corrupt protection f or sale to firms:Evidence from Indonesia[D]. Colorado:University of Colorado at Boulder, 2006.
    [24] BUNKANWANICHA. Big business owners in politics[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(6):2133-2168.
    [25] GOLDMAN E, ROCHOLL J. Political connections and the allocation of procurement contracts[D]. Working Paper, 2008.
    [26] BERTRAND M, KRAMARZ F. Politically connected CEOs and corporate outcomes:Evidence from France[D].Chicago:University of Chicago, 2007.
    [27] ADHIKARI C. Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates:Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2006, 25(5):574-595.
    [28] 张超,陈名芹,刘星.货币政策传导、制度背景与企业资本投资[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2015,21(4):47-58.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘美芬.高管政治关系影响民营企业绩效的作用机理研究——制度嵌入视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(4):182-187. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2016.04.022

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-07-18
文章二维码