故意杀人案件死刑限制之被害人过错情节的提取与界定
作者:
中图分类号:

D924.12

基金项目:

重庆市社科联青年项目"被害人过错与被害人过错量刑情节的证据与证明"(2013QNFX39)


The victim fault's extraction and definition which limit death penalty in intentional homicide case
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [10]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    最高人民法院《全国法院维护农村稳定刑事审判工作座谈会纪要》《关于为构建社会主义和谐社会提供司法保障的若干意见》中均有关于被害人一方有明显过错或对矛盾激化负有直接责任的,以及因被害人方过错引发的案件,一般不应判处死刑立即执行或应慎用死刑立即执行的规定,从而使被害人过错情节在故意杀人案件中发挥着重要的死刑限制功能。以上文件虽然明确被害人过错情节的提取应遵循"明显过错""直接责任""引发"这样的原则,但该原则如何界定,相关部门并未作出细化解释,实践中多依法官的自由裁量加以解决。在提倡量刑规范化的当下,遵循类型化思路,归纳提炼"明显""直接责任""引发"型被害人过错的界域,对于被害人过错情节在故意杀人案件中发挥的死刑限制功能,具有重大的司法意义。

    Abstract:

    The Supreme People's Court's National Court Maintaining Rural Stability in Criminal Trial Work Symposium Summary and Several Opinions on Providing Judicial Safeguarding for Building a Harmonious Socialist Society both have rules about "if the victim party has obvious fault or has direct responsibility for the situation,and in cases caused by the fault of the victim party,generally death sentence with immediate execution should not be imposed or should be imposed cautiously",so that the victim fault plot could play an important death penalty restriction function in intentional homicide case. But how to define "obvious fault","direct responsibility",and "cause",relevant departments have not made detailed explanation,and in practice it is often solved by the discretion of the judges. In promoting the standardization of sentencing,following the idea of typification and summarizing the boundary of the victim fault have great judicial significance for the death penalty limitation function of the victim fault in intentional homicide case.

    参考文献
    [1] 德国刑法典[M].徐久生,庄敬华,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2000:161.
    [2] 俄罗斯联邦刑法典[M].黄道秀,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2004:50.
    [3] 瑞士联邦刑法典[M].徐久生,庄敬华,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2004:135.
    [4] 宣炳昭.香港刑法导论[M]. 西安:陕西人民出版社,2008:125.
    [5] 杨丹.被害人过错的刑法含义[M]//比较刑法研究.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:171.
    [6] 刘军.刑法学中的被害人研究[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2010:154.
    [7] 蒋鹏飞.作为辩护理由的被害人过错:概念界定、理论基础与认定标准[J].中国刑事法杂志,2009(8):26-38.
    [8] 吕锐.刑事被害人过错的认定[J].北京人民警察学院学报,2010(3):19-22.
    [9] VERA BELGELSON.Conditional rights and comparative wrongs:More on the theory and application of comparative criminal liability[J]. Forum on Comparative Liability in Criminal Law,Criminal Law Review,2005(8).
    [10] HAREL A. Efficiency and fairness in criminal law:The case for a criminal law principle of comparative fault[J]. California Law Review,1994(6).
    引证文献
引用本文

初红漫.故意杀人案件死刑限制之被害人过错情节的提取与界定[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2018,24(5):163-172. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2018.05.015

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1048
  • 下载次数: 949
  • HTML阅读次数: 1780
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2018-05-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-13
文章二维码