地震灾后重建绩效测量——以汶川、玉树、芦山地震为例
作者:
中图分类号:

D632.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目"高效减灾与重建:灾害冲击与灾后重建绩效的影响因素及其作用机制研究——基于灾害周期的视角"(71473022);国家社会科学基金重点项目"我国中长期规划决策机制及方法论研究"(15AZD016);中央高校基本科研业务费(CDJKXB13003)


Performance measurement of post disaster reconstruction: Taking Wenchuan, Yushu, Lushan Earthquake as examples
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [30]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    灾后重建是保障地震灾区群众重归正常生产生活的重要工作,那么如何测量灾后重建绩效,哪些因素会影响灾后重建绩效?文章回顾了灾后重建绩效相关研究文献,在此基础上认为效果和效率是灾后重建绩效的两大方面,以"消除灾害影响并恢复到灾前水平所用的时间"作为衡量灾后重建绩效的标准,能够反映灾后重建的效果和效率,具有可行性。以此为基础建立了灾后重建绩效的分析框架和测量方法,并选择汶川地震、玉树地震和芦山地震作为案例,对三次地震灾区的重建绩效进行了对比分析并简要分析了绩效差异原因。结果表明,三次地震灾后重建基本如期完成了灾后重建目标任务,但因存在灾害程度不同、对口支援质量不同等原因,三次地震灾后重建绩效存在一定差异。

    Abstract:

    Post disaster reconstruction is an important job to ensure the return to normal production and life of the people in the earthquake stricken areas. So, how to measure the performance of post disaster reconstruction? Which factors will affect the performance of post disaster reconstruction? This paper reviews the related literature on performance of post disaster reconstruction. On this basis, this paper argues that the effect and efficiency are two major aspects of the performance of post disaster reconstruction. So, using the time spent in eliminating the impact of disasters and returning to the pre disaster level as standard of measuring the reconstruction performance can reflect the reconstruction effect and efficiency. It has feasibility. Based on this, this paper establishes an analytical framework and measurement method for post disaster reconstruction performance. Taking the Wenchuan earthquake, the Yushu earthquake and the Lushan earthquake as the cases, the paper compares and analyzes the reconstruction performance of the three earthquake stricken areas, and briefly analyzes the reasons for the performance differences. The results show that the three earthquake reconstruction basically completed the goal of post disaster reconstruction on schedule, but because of the different degree of disaster, different quality of reconstruction after disaster, there are some differences in the performance of the three post-earthquake reconstruction.

    参考文献
    [1] STREETER C L.Disaster hits home:New policy for urban housing recovery[J].Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare,1999(4):186-188.
    [2] HIRAYAMA Y.Collapse and reconstruction:Housing recovery Policy in Kobe after the Hanshin Great Earthquake[J]. Housing Studies,2000,15(1):111-128.
    [3] RUBIN C B,POPKIN R.Disaster recovery after Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina[J].Furacões,1990,69:1-91.
    [4] CHANG S E,FALIT-BAIAMONTE A.Disaster vulnerability of businesses in the 2001 Nisqually earthquake[J]. Environmental Hazards,2002,4(2):59-71.
    [5] WEBB G R,TIERNEY K J,DAHLHAMER J M.Businesses and disasters:Empirical patterns and unanswered questions[J].Nat Hazards Review,2000(2):83-90.
    [6] MILETI D,NOJI E.Disasters by design:A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States[M].Washington DC:Joseph Henry Press,1999:1-39.
    [7] OLSHANSKY R B.Toward a theory of community recovery from disaster:A review of existing literature[C]//Proceedings of the 1st international conference of urban disaster reduction.Kobe,Japan:Japan Institute of Social Safety Science,2005:18-20.
    [8] HAAS J E,KATES R W,BOWDEN M J.Disaster and reconstruction[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT Press, 1977.
    [9] Federal Emergency Management Agency.Hazards,disasters and the US emergency management system:An introduction, session 6:Fundamentals of US emergency management[R].Washington DC:FEMA, 2000.
    [10] QUARANTELLI E L.The disaster recovery process:What we know and do not know from research[J]. Disaster Research Center,1999(286):1-22.
    [11] ALESCH D J.Complex urban systems and extreme events:Toward a theory of disaster recovery[C]//Kobe Japan:1st International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction,2005:18-20.
    [12] 陈升,毛咪,刘泽.灾后重建能力与绩效的实证研究——以汶川地震灾区县级政府为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014(8):156-161.
    [13] HOOGENBOEZEM J A.Local government performance indicators in Europe:An exploration[J].International Review of Administrative Sciences,2004(1):51-64.
    [14] CHRISTOPHE A,CHOUDHURY K.Performance of national disaster management organizations:An evaluation model[J].Southwestern Economic Review,2009(1):1-2.
    [15] ABRAMSON D M,STEHLINGARIZA T,PARK Y S,et al.Measuring individual disaster recovery:a socioecological framework[J].Disaster Medicine & Public Health Preparedness,2010(S1):46-54.
    [16] 陆奇斌,张强,张欢,等.基层政府绩效与受灾群众满意度的关系[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):120-128.
    [17] 陈升,孟庆国.汶川地震对受灾居民的影响研究——来自四川省5个地震重灾区的调查[J].中国人口科学,2009(4):91-99,112.
    [18] 陈升,孟庆国,胡鞍钢.政府应急能力及应急管理绩效实证研究——以汶川特大地震地方县市政府为例[J].中国软科学,2010(2):169-178.
    [19] 钟炜,陆晓春.灾后恢复重建项目绩效评价指标体系的构建方法[J].项目管理技术,2009(11):17-20.
    [20] 宋伟,余平洋.基于时效视角的灾后重建公益性投资项目绩效评估指标体系构建研究[J].建筑经济,2011(2):55-57.
    [21] 杨月巧,迟宝明,胡俊锋,等.地震灾后恢复重建的后评价框架体系研究[J].灾害学,2014(1):18-24.
    [22] BATES F L,PEACOCK W G.Measuring disaster impact on household living conditions[J].International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters,1992(1):133-160.
    [23] BOLIN R C.Household and community recovery after earthquakes[D].Colorado:University of Colorado,1993.
    [24] BURTON C,MITCHELL J T,CUTTER S L.Evaluating post-Katrina recovery in Mississippi using repeat photography[J]. Disasters,2011(3):488-509.
    [25] CHANG S E.Urban disaster recovery:a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake[J]. Disasters,2010(2):303-327.
    [26] BEVINGTON J S,HILL A A,DAVIDSON R A,et al.Measuring, monitoring, and evaluating post-disaster recovery:A key element in understanding community resilience[C]//Structures Congress,2011:2033-2043.
    [27] 尉建文,谢镇荣.灾后重建中的政府满意度——基于汶川地震的经验发现[J].社会学研究,2015(1):97-113,243-244.
    [28] 唐兵,郭伟.还权于民:政府非常态下管理绩效评估主体的转换——基于汶川特大地震灾区群众对政府工作满意度及其影响因素的分析[J].探索,2011(3):93-97.
    [29] 陈升,刘泽.县级政府灾后重建能力与绩效的纵向变化研究——以汶川地震为例[J].公共管理学报,2014(3):38-48,140-141.
    [30] 钟开斌.对口支援:起源、形成及其演化[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2013(4):14-24,125-126.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈升,唐元杰.地震灾后重建绩效测量——以汶川、玉树、芦山地震为例[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2018,24(6):22-32. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2018.06.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1068
  • 下载次数: 979
  • HTML阅读次数: 1319
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2018-06-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-10-25
文章二维码