孔子学院对中国出口贸易的促进效应——基于“一带一路”沿线国家的实证分析
作者:
中图分类号:

G124;F752.62

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目"高铁对中国区域经济增长与趋同的影响研究"(71673033);中央高校基本科研业务费项目"‘一带一路’建设民心相通框架下孔子学院跨文化传播研究"(2018CDXYJG0040);重庆大学研究生重点课程建设项目"高级计量经济学"(201805055)


The promoting effect of Confucius Institutes on China's export trade: An empirical analysis based on the countries along “The Belt and Road”
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章基于中国与"一带一路"沿线60个贸易伙伴国(地区)2012-2016年出口贸易的面板数据,从文化与贸易互动视角,构建了包含5个一级指标和13个二级指标的跨文化传播效果综合评价指标体系,量化评估孔子学院跨文化传播在规模(广度)和效果(深度)方面的差异,建立空间面板杜宾模型研究孔子学院汉语文化推广的时空演进对中国出口贸易的影响。研究发现:"一带一路"国家(地区)孔子学院汉语跨文化传播在规模上持续增长,但是在传播效果方面则存在滞后,特别是自主拓展能力和可持续发展能力方面提升迟缓,综合影响力参差不齐,整体汉语推广潜力及文化传播效果有待进一步挖掘和优化;孔子学院跨文化传播对中国在"一带一路"沿线的出口贸易具有较大促进作用,而且,除了对所在国(地区)产生正向影响外,对邻近国家也有显著的正溢出效应。

    Abstract:

    Using China's export trade panel data with 60 trading partners along "The Belt and Road", from the interactive perspective of culture and trade, this paper quantifies cultural communication effects by constructing a comprehensive evaluation index system including five first-level indicators and 13 second-level indicators, and using spatial Dubin model to study the influence of spatio-temporal evolution of Chinese culture promotion by the Confucius Institute on export. Our empirical evidence shows that:Firstly, while the scale of Chinese communication promoting by Confucius Institutes in countries along "The Belt and Road" has risen steadily, but the quality of communication is low, the sustainable development is slow and the comprehensive influence is uneven. The overall potential and quality of promoting communication and exchange between cultures and nations needs to be further developed. Secondly, cross-cultural communication arouse by Confucius Institutes has a positive role in increasing China's exports to the countries along "The Belt and Road". There is not only a significant interaction effect on the countries (regions) in which they are located, but also positive spillover effects on neighboring countries.

    参考文献
    [1] MELITZ J.Language and foreign trade[J].European Economic Review,2008,52(4):667-699.
    [2] LEVCHENKO A A.Institutional quality and international trade[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2007,74(3):791-819.
    [3] NUNN N.Relationship-specificity,incomplete contracts,and the pattern of trade[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007,122(2):569-600.
    [4] COSTINOT A.On the origins of comparative advantage[J].Journal of International Economics,2009,77(2):255-264.
    [5] 李坤望,王永进.契约执行效率与地区出口绩效差异——基于行业特征的经验分析[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(3):1007-1028.
    [6] 许家云,佟家栋,毛其淋.人民币汇率变动、产品排序与多产品企业的出口行为——以中国制造业企业为例[J].管理世界,2015(2):17-31.
    [7] HUTCHINSON W K.Does ease of communication increase trade?Commonality of language and bilateral trade[J]. Scottish Journal of Political Economy,2002,49(5):544-556.
    [8] MELITZ J,TOUBAL F.Native language,spoken language,translation and trade[J].Journal of International Economics,2014,93(2):351-363.
    [9] LOHMANN J.Do language barriers affect trade?[J].Economics Letters,2011,110(2):159-162.
    [10] KRISTENSEN N D.Dose culture matter in trade?A gravity approach[D].Aarhus:Aarhus University,2017.
    [11] 万伦来,高翔.文化、地理与制度三重距离对中国进出口贸易的影响——来自32个国家和地区进出口贸易的经验数据[J].国际经贸探索,2014,30(5):39-48.
    [12] 吉尔特·霍夫斯泰德,格特·扬·霍夫斯泰德.文化与组织:心理软件的力量[M].李原,孙健敏,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
    [13] 王蕙. Hofstede的文化维度理论的局限性[J].西安工业大学学报,2013,33(1):58-62.
    [14] LIEN D,OH C H,SELMIER W T.Confucius institute effects on China's trade and FDI:Isn't it delightful when folks afar study Hanyu?[J].International Review of Economics & Finance,2012,21(1):147-155.
    [15] 谢孟军.文化"走出去"的投资效应研究:全球1326所孔子学院的数据[J].国际贸易问题,2017(1):39-49.
    [16] 连大祥.孔子学院对中国出口贸易及对外直接投资的影响[J].中国人民大学学报,2012,26(1):88-98.
    [17] 林航,谢志忠,池丽丽.孔子学院促进了中国文化产品出口吗?——基于2004-2014年37个国家的面板数据的实证分析[J].山东工商学院学报,2016,30(3):6-11.
    [18] 谢孟军.中华文化"走出去"对我国出口贸易的影响研究[J].国际经贸探索,2017,33(1):32-46.
    [19] PARADISE J F.China and international harmony:the role of confucius institutes in bolstering Beijing's soft power[J].Asian Survey,2009,49(4):647-669.
    [20] 吴应辉.孔子学院评估指标体系研究[J].教育研究,2011,32(8):30-34,92.
    [21] 吴瑛.中国文化对外传播效果研究——对5国16所孔子学院的调查[J].浙江社会科学,2012(4):144-151.
    [22] 吴才天子.基于层次分析法的孔子学院评估指标体系研究[J].亚太教育,2016(36):265-267.
    [23] 谢杰,刘任余.基于空间视角的中国对外直接投资的影响因素与贸易效应研究[J].国际贸易问题,2011(6):66-74.
    [24] 许家云,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.制度距离、相邻效应与双边贸易——基于"一带一路"国家空间面板模型的实证分析[J].财经研究,2017,43(1):75-85.
    [25] KELLER W,SHIUE C H.The origin of spatial interaction[J].Journal of Econometrics,2007,140(1):304-332.
    [26] 侯新烁,张宗益,周靖祥.中国经济结构的增长效应及作用路径研究[J].世界经济,2013,36(5):88-111.
    [27] 吕冰洋,余丹林.中国梯度发展模式下经济效率的增进——基于空间视角的分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):60-72.
    [28] 任英华,徐玲,游万海.金融集聚影响因素空间计量模型及其应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,27(5):104-115.
    [29] 王美今,林建浩,余壮雄.中国地方政府财政竞争行为特性识别:"兄弟竞争"与"父子争议"是否并存?[J].管理世界, 2010(3):22-31.
    [30] 陈继勇,雷欣,黄开琢.知识溢出、自主创新能力与外商直接投资[J].管理世界,2010(7):30-42.
    [31] BURRIDGE P.On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial correlation[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series b (Methodological),1980,42(1):107-108.
    [32] BERA A K,YOON M J.Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives[J].Econometric Theory,1993, 9(4):649.
    [33] GRIFFITH D A,ANSELIN L.Spatial econometrics:methods and models[J].Economic Geography,1989,65(2):160.
    [34] ELHORST J P.Applied spatial econometrics:raising the bar[J].Spatial Economic Analysis,2010,5(1):9-28.
    [35] KOGUT B,SINGH H.The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1988,19(3):411-432.
    [36] 綦建红,李丽,杨丽.中国OFDI的区位选择:基于文化距离的门槛效应与检验[J].国际贸易问题,2012(12):137-147.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

康继军,张梦珂,黎静.孔子学院对中国出口贸易的促进效应——基于“一带一路”沿线国家的实证分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2019,25(5):1-17. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2019.03.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1193
  • 下载次数: 1394
  • HTML阅读次数: 1557
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2019-01-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-09
文章二维码