“双一流”建设高校科研效率及其变化——基于超效率和Malmquist指数分解
作者:
中图分类号:

G644

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目教育学一般课题"‘双一流’建设大学科研绩效评价与拨款机制研究"(BFA180066)


The research efficiency of “Double First-Class” universities and its changes: Based on super-efficiency DEA and Malmquist index decomposition
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [26]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    科学合理地评估高校科研效率,并据此优化高校科研资源配置,进而提高科研效率,是落实"双一流"建设方案"绩效评价、动态支持"要求的重要路径。选取教育部直属"双一流"建设高校,构建突出科研质量和贡献度的指标体系,使用超效率BCC模型和Malmquist模型方法,分析2010-2015年间高校的科研效率及其变动。研究发现:样本科研效率整体偏低,科研效率虽有提高但速度缓慢,导致科研效率提高的主要因素是科研管理效率提升和规模效率增加,但规模效应趋于衰减。中西部地区高校由于经费投入不稳定,科研效率波动较大,大理类高校科研效率持续降低。未来应主要通过提高科研管理水平和创新科研生产技术来提高科研效率,摆脱对要素投入驱动的过度依赖;同时加强对中西部高校稳定持续的经费投入,改进经费与人力资源的匹配度,优化大理类高校的学科结构。

    Abstract:

    It is an important path to implement the performance based funding requirement of the "Double First-Class" policy by assessing the efficiency of research of universities,optimizing the allocation of research resources and improving its efficiency. This article selects the "Double First-Class" universities that directly under the Ministry of Education as a sample to assess the research efficiency and its changes of universities during 2010-2015. An indicator system which highlights the quality and contribution of scientific research is utilized,and DEA-BCC model and the Malmquist index are employed. The results show that:the overall research efficiency of these universities was low,slowly improving during the period,which was mainly enhanced by the increase in management efficiency and scale efficiency; however,the scale effect was decreasing. The research efficiency of universities in the central and western regions fluctuated significantly due to the unstable research funding,and the research efficiency of universities specialized in science and engineering (S&E) continued to decrease. In the future,it should depend more on the improvement of research management and technology innovation to increase research efficiency and get rid of the heavy dependence on the factor-driven model. Moreover,it should stabilize the investment and better the match between funds and human resources of the universities in the central and western regions,and optimize the disciplinary structure of the S&E universities.

    参考文献
    [1] 科技部,教育部.中国普通高校创新能力监测报告[EB/OL].(2017-10-12)[2018-06-20].http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A16/moe_789/201710/t20171012_316131.html.
    [2] BENNER M,LIU L,SERGER S. Head in the clouds and feet on the ground:research priority setting in China[J].Science and Public Policy,2012,39(2):258-270.
    [3] MINGERS J,LEYDESDORFF L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2015,246(1):1-19.
    [4] 袁振国,张男星,孙继红. 2012年高校绩效评价研究报告[J]. 教育研究,2013(10):55-64.
    [5] COOPER W W,SEIFORD L M,ZHU J.Handbook on data envelopment analysis[M].New York:Springer,2011:1-3.
    [6] NG C,LI S K. Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions:an application of data envelopment analysis[J]. Education Economics,2000,8(2):139-156.
    [7] NG Y C,LI S K. Efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese universities during the post-reform period[J]. China Economic Review,2009,20(2):183-192.
    [8] 周伟.基于DEA方法的研究型大学科研绩效实证研究[D].天津:天津大学,2010.
    [9] JOHNES J,YU L. Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis[J].China Economic Review,2008,19(4):679-696.
    [10] CHARNES A,COOPER W,RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1979,2(6):429-444.
    [11] BANKER R,CHARNES A,COOPER W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J].Management Science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.
    [12] ANDERSEN P,PETERSEN N. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science,1993,39(10):1261-1265.
    [13] CHEN J,DENG M. A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(8):9648-9655.
    [14] MALMQUIST S. Index numbers and indifference surfaces[J]. Trabajos de Estadistica,1953(2):209-242.
    [15] FARE R,GROSSKOPF S. Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes[J].The Economic Journal,1992,102(410):158-160.
    [16] FARE R,GROSSKOPF S. Intertemporal production frontiers:with dynamic DEA[M]. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1996:47-66.
    [17] ZOFIO J L. Malmquist productivity index decompositions:a unifying framework[J]. Applied Economics,2007,39(18):2371-2387.
    [18] 潘健,宗晓华. 基于数据包络分析的大学科研效率评价指标体系研究[J]. 清华大学教育研究,2016(5):101-110.
    [19] 丁敬达,邱均平. 科研评价指标体系优化方法研究:以中国高校科技创新竞争力评价为例[J]. 评价与管理,2010(1):111-118.
    [20] 赵蓉英,张心源."双一流"建设背景下中国高校人才与大学排名相关性分析:基于RCCSE2017年中国大学及学科专业评价报告[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):117-127.
    [21] 北京大学.关于印发《北京大学科学技术成果奖励办法》的通知(校发[2009] 213号)[EB/OL]. (2009-12-15)[2018-06-29]. http://www.research.pku.edu.cn/docs/2018-06/20180629090152839622.pdf.
    [22] GOLANY B,ROLL Y. An application procedure for DEA[J].Omega,1989,17(3):237-250.
    [23] 刘树林,邱菀华. 多属性决策基础理论研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998(1):39-44.
    [24] ZONG X,ZHANG W. Establishing world-class universities in China:deploying a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the net effects of Project 985[EB/OL].[2018-08-11]. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1368475.
    [25] 罗杭,郭珍. 2012年中国"985"大学效率评价:基于DEA-Tobit模型的教学-科研效率评价与结构-环境影响分析[J]. 高等教育研究. 2014(12):35-45.
    [26] 罗杭. 中国理工类"985工程"大学效率评价[J].高等工程教育研究,2017(1):133-139.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

宗晓华,付呈祥.“双一流”建设高校科研效率及其变化——基于超效率和Malmquist指数分解[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(1):93-106. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2019.05.003

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1301
  • 下载次数: 1189
  • HTML阅读次数: 988
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2019-03-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-30
文章二维码