“一带一路”背景下中国对外承包工程的国别环境评价研究
作者:
中图分类号:

F279.2;F125

基金项目:

重庆市社会科学规划项目"‘一带一路’倡议下重庆产业转型升级路径与对策研究:基于新结构经济学的视角"(2017YBJJ027);四川外国语大学校级科研项目"‘一带一路’背景下重庆建筑企业参与跨国PPP项目的国别选择与路径研究"(sisu201725)


Evaluation on country environment of Chinese foreign contracted project under The Belt and Road Initiative
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [29]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对外承包工程是中国与"一带一路"沿线国家经济合作的主要形式之一,加强沿线国家承包工程的国别环境研究有利于降低风险和提高成功率。文章基于现有研究,新增营商环境因素,指标设计上考虑基础设施承包工程的特点,构建了包含6个环境因素、33个指标的工程承包国别环境综合评价体系,运用熵权法对"一带一路"64个国家的工程承包国别环境进行定量评价,对熵权法结果进行了Spearman检验和对国别环境综合值进行了聚类分析。研究结果表明:基础设施环境和经济环境是"一带一路"沿线工程承包重要的国别选择因素;"一带一路"沿线各国的工程承包环境差异显著,分布很不平衡,东南亚、南亚地区国家环境较好,中东欧和西亚北非区域次之,东亚、中亚和独联体地区较差;根据"一带一路"沿线国家工程承包环境评综合价值的大小,可以划分为四种类型:好、较好、较差和差。研究结论不仅为中国在"一带一路"沿线各国开展工程承包提供了国别选择的经验证据,同时为积极落实我国"走出去"战略以及"一带一路"倡议提供了重要参考。

    Abstract:

    External contracting projects are one of the main forms of economic cooperation between China and countries along "The Belt and Road". Strengthening the country environmental research of the contracted projects along the "The Belt and Road" is conducive to reducing risks and improving the success rate. Based on the existing research, new business environment factors and the characteristics of infrastructure contracting projects are taken into consideration. A comprehensive environmental evaluation system for project contracting countries with 6 environmental factors and 33 indicators is constructed and the entropy value method is used to quantitatively study 64 countries' environment of contracting project. Then this paper tests the result of the application of entropy value method with Spearman and clusters comprehensive evaluation value through SPSS 19.0. The empirical evidence shows that:Firstly, the infrastructure environment and economic factors are the most important factors influencing Chinese enterprises' decision of foreign project contracting country selection; Secondly, project contracting environment is very different and imbalance among the countries along "The Belt and Road", it is better in southeast and south Asia, secondary in Central and eastern Europe and West Asia and North Africa, worse in East Asia, Central Asia and the commonwealth of independent states; Lastly, according to the comprehensive evaluation value, the countries' environment of contracting project is divided into four types:good, better, worse, and worst. This study has positive empirical evidence for Chinese construction enterprises to actively develop foreign contracted projects in the countries along "The Belt and Road", and also provides valued reference for the implementation of Chinese "The Belt and Road" and "go out" strategies.

    参考文献
    [1] 卜小龙."一带一路"背景下工程承包业走出去的思考[J].宏观经济管理,2016(2):57-60.
    [2] 栾茵.中国对外承包工程企业:机遇与战略调整[J].国际经济与合作,2016(10):71-73.
    [3] 黄河,邹为.中国建筑企业在"一带一路"沿线基础设施投资的政治风险及其管控[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(4):104-113.
    [4] 徐景雷.基于"一带一路"新战略的国际工程新模式研究[J].企业改革与管理,2017(3):10-11.
    [5] 罗晓斐.中国对"丝绸之路经济带"国家工程承包的区位因素分析:基于引力模型的经验考察[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2016(4):60-71.
    [6] 张纯威,戴本忠.中国对"一带一路"沿线国家工程承包:地位、动因与策略[J].对外经贸,2017(11):47-52.
    [7] 何凡,曾剑宇.我国对外承包工程受双边关系影响吗?:基于"一带一路"沿线主要国家的研究[J].国际商务研究,2018,39(6):57-66,94.
    [8] 胡俊超,王丹丹."一带一路"沿线国家国别风险研究[J].经济问题,2016(5):1-6,43.
    [9] 胡必亮,潘庆中."一带一路"沿线国家综合发展水平测算、排序与评估(总报告)[J].经济研究参考,2017(15):4-15.
    [10] NEŽERENKO O,KOPPEL O.The baltic Sea macro-regional transport cluster as an element of the Silk Road Economic Belt[J].Croatian International Relations Review,2017,23(78):77-95.
    [11] 张莉."一带一路"倡议下中国与东盟营商环境差异与协同构建研究[J].经济与管理,2017,31(2):27-32.
    [12] TRACY E F,SHVARTS E,SIMONOV E,et al.China's new Eurasian ambitions:the environmental risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt[J].Eurasian Geography and Economics,2017,58(1):56-88.
    [13] 张晓君,李文怡."一带一路"国别投资法治环境评估体系的构建[J].法学杂志,2018,39(11):23-34.
    [14] 程中海,南楠."一带一路"框架下东道国制度环境与中国对外直接投资潜力[J].软科学,2018,32(1):36-40.
    [15] 史雪娜,李嫣资."一带一路"倡议下我国对外投资环境分析[J].商业经济研究,2016(6):184-185.
    [16] LI Y,ZHENG J,JIN X T,et al.Integrated assessment of investment environment and actions for the "belt and road" countries[J].Geography,Environment,Sustainability,2017,10(1):21-33.
    [17] SHRESTHA M B.Cooperation on finance between China and Nepal:Belt and Road initiatives and investment opportunities in Nepal[J].The Journal of Finance and Data Science,2017,3(1/2/3/4):31-37.
    [18] 权衡,张鹏飞.亚洲地区"一带一路"建设与企业投资环境分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2017,19(1):88-102.
    [19] 张琼,张珂,杨晓龙,等."一带一路"沿线国家油气投资环境评价研究[J].价格理论与实践,2018(4):130-133.
    [20] 穆献中,李凯.投资环境评价方法评述[J].商业经济研究,2015(7):64-66.
    [21] CHEN C,MESSNER J I.Entry mode taxonomy for international construction markets[J].Journal of Management in Engineering,2009,25(1):3-11.
    [22] 陈勇强,卓瑞,王秀芹.中国对外承包工程劳务属地化策略研究[J].中国软科学,2014(12):104-111.
    [23] 王政.中国海外承包工程风险及防范[J].国际经济合作,2011(10):24-27.
    [24] 曾剑宇,蒋骄亮,何凡.东道国国家风险与我国对外承包工程:基于跨国面板数据的实证研究[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2017(6):6-18.
    [25] 尹美群,盛磊,吴博."一带一路"东道国要素禀赋、制度环境对中国对外经贸合作方式及区位选择的影响[J].世界经济研究,2019(1):81-92,136-137.
    [26] 林珣.关于打造国际一流营商环境的思考[J].北方经贸,2016(1):34-35.
    [27] 中国对外承包工程商会.中国一带一路指数平台[EB/OL].[2018-05-02].http://www.bridi-research.com/#/home.
    [28] 华东政法大学政治学研究院.国家治理指数2016[R].华东政法大学,2017.
    [29] 孙利娟,邢小军,周德群.熵值赋权法的改进[J].统计与决策,2010(21):153-154.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

许劲,曹阳,于全辉.“一带一路”背景下中国对外承包工程的国别环境评价研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(3):1-18. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2019.05.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1782
  • 下载次数: 2212
  • HTML阅读次数: 1864
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-01
文章二维码