人工智能体刑法地位的教义学反思
作者:
中图分类号:

D914

基金项目:

上海市社会科学规划青年课题"人工智能致害责任:法理基础、致害类型及归责路径"(2018EFX001);中国博士后科学基金(2018M642886)


Reflections on the doctrine of the status of artificial intelligence in criminal law
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着智慧社会的到来,人工智能体广泛应用于社会各个领域,智能水平不断提升,与之相关的犯罪问题逐渐走向理论和实践的焦点。人工智能体冲击着刑法教义学主体和客体相区分的二元结构,引发了广泛的讨论和争议。探讨人工智能体的刑法地位应当改变混同分析主体性和能力性的思路,区分不法和责任两个层面进行研究。应基于人工智能的发展阶段,明确现阶段人工智能体仍然属于弱人工智能,因此其无法成为犯罪人或被害人,也无法具备责任能力或承担刑事责任。但是人工智能体日益可能成为犯罪对象,与之相关的自然人和法人犯罪也应当受到重视。探讨人工智能相关的刑法问题应当立足于教义学的基本立场与理论范式。

    Abstract:

    With the advent of the intelligent society, artificial intelligence is widely used in various fields of society, and the level of intelligence is constantly improving. The crime problems related to it gradually move towards the focus of theory and practice. Artificial intelligence has impacted the dual structure of the subject and object of criminal theory, which led to extensive discussion and controversy. To explore the criminal law status of artificial intelligence should change the analysis way of combining the subjectivity and ability, and distinguish between the two levels of illegality and responsibility. It should be based on the development stage of artificial intelligence, and it is clear that artificial intelligence still belongs to weak artificial intelligence at this stage, so it cannot become a criminal or a victim, nor can it have the capacity for responsibility or take criminal responsibility. However, artificial intelligence is increasingly likely to be the object of crime, and related crimes of natural person and legal person should also be taken seriously. The discussion of criminal problems related to artificial intelligence should be based on the basic position and theoretical paradigm of doctrine.

    参考文献
    [1] ČERKA P,GRIGIENE·J,SIRBIKYTE·G.Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence[J].Computer Law & Security Review,2015,31(3):376-389.
    [2] 刘宪权.人工智能时代机器人行为道德伦理与刑法规制[J].比较法研究,2018(4):40-54.
    [3] 刘宪权,胡荷佳.论人工智能时代智能机器人的刑事责任能力[J].法学,2018,8(1):40-47.
    [4] 莫宏伟.强人工智能与弱人工智能的伦理问题思考[J].科学与社会,2018,8(1):14-24.
    [5] 魏克家.刑法的基本问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012:118.
    [6] 王肃之.人工智能犯罪的理论与立法问题初探[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,39(4):53-63.
    [7] 吴汉东.人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(5):128-136.
    [8] 申柳华.德国刑法被害人信条学研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2011:96.
    [9] 张明楷.刑法学(下)[M].5版.北京:法律出版社,2016:1010.
    [10] 吴允锋.人工智能时代侵财犯罪刑法适用的困境与出路[J].法学,2018(5):165-179.
    [11] 大谷实.刑法讲义各论[M].东京:成文堂,2015:258-259.
    [12] 叶良芳,马路瑶.风险社会视阈下人工智能犯罪的刑法应对[J].浙江学刊,2018(6):65-72.
    [13] 山口厚.刑法总论[M].东京:有斐阁,2016:271-272.
    [14] 大谷实.刑法讲义总论[M].东京:成文堂,2012:315.
    [15] 高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:85.
    [16] 陈伟,熊波.人工智能刑事风险的治理逻辑与刑法转向:基于人工智能犯罪与网络犯罪的类型差异[J].学术界,2018(9):74-91.
    [17] 时方.人工智能刑事主体地位之否定[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018,36(6):67-75.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王肃之.人工智能体刑法地位的教义学反思[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(3):122-130. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2019.03.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1106
  • 下载次数: 1519
  • HTML阅读次数: 1564
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-01
文章二维码