区域旅游竞争力评价与空间格局演化研究——以广东省21个地市为例
作者:
中图分类号:

F061.5;F592.7

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"扩大我国服务业对外开放的路径与战略研究"(14AZD084);中国国家留学基金面上项目(留金发〔2018〕3058号);国家社会科学基金一般项目"现代服务业与新型城镇化互动发展的演进机制、实现途径与政策保障研究"(14BJY141);国家自然科学基金面上项目"信息技术对知识密集型服务业创新影响的空间效应和动力机制研究"(41471106)


Study on regional tourism competitiveness evaluation and spatial pattern evolution: Taking Guangdong Province as an example
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章针对现有相关研究存在的不足,重新构建区域旅游竞争力评价指标体系,利用熵值法定量评价2010—2016年广东21个地市旅游竞争力,运用空间聚类分析法分析其差异性特征,利用全局和局部空间自相关分析法探讨其空间演化特征。结果表明:广东省内区域旅游竞争力水平差异明显,主要表现为珠三角城市的旅游竞争力水平普遍较高,其他地市大多较低;各地市旅游竞争力整体上有明显的自相关性,呈现较强的集聚效应,但该效应有下降趋势;各地市旅游竞争力已形成较稳定的空间格局,即中间突出、四周凹陷;各地市旅游竞争力水平在空间上的局部自相关性不显著;热—冷点区域的空间分布呈现出由珠三角城市逐渐向四周推移的圈级特征,形成了以珠三角城市群为热点区的核心—边缘结构。基于研究结论,文章提出需在继续保持珠三角地区旅游竞争力优势的同时增强其辐射和带动作用,加大政府对粤东、粤西、粤北地区旅游业发展的支持力度,加强区域(城市)间的交流与合作,推动区域旅游一体化建设等建议。文章可为其他区域旅游竞争力评价及空间格局演化研究提供有益借鉴,为促进区域旅游和经济发展提供决策参考。

    Abstract:

    In view of the shortcomings of the existing relevant studies, this paper reconstructs the evaluation index system of regional tourism competitiveness, quantitatively evaluates the tourism competitiveness of 21 prefecture-level cities of Guangdong Province from 2010 to 2016 by applying entropy method, uses the spatial clustering analysis to have a further discussion about the tourism competitiveness differences among the cities, utilizes overall and local spatial auto-correlation analysis to explore the spatial evolution characteristics of tourism competitiveness of these cities. The results show that:1)There are obvious differences in the level of regional tourism competitiveness in Guangdong Province, mainly manifested in the high level of tourism competitiveness in the Pearl River Delta cities and the low level of tourism competitiveness in other regional cities; 2)The tourism competitiveness of each city has obvious self-correlation on the whole, showing a strong agglomeration effect, but the effect has a downward trend;3)The tourism competitiveness of various cities has formed a relatively stable spatial pattern, that is, the center is protruded, and the surrounding is sunken; 4)The spatial partial autocorrelation of tourism competitiveness level in different cities is not significant; 5)The spatial distribution of the hot-cold spot area presents a circle-level distribution gradually from the Pearl River Delta cities to the surrounding areas, forming the core-edge structure with the Pearl River Delta cities as the hotspot area. Based on these conclusions, this paper suggests that it is necessary to continually maintain the competitiveness advantage of the Pearl River Delta region while enhancing its radiation and leading role, increase the governmental support for tourism development in eastern Guangdong, western Guangdong and northern Guangdong, and strengthen exchanges and cooperation among regions (urbans) to promote the integration of regional tourism. This paper provides useful references for the study on tourism competitiveness evaluation and spatial pattern evolution in other regions outside Guangdong province, and also provides decision-making references for promoting regional tourism and economic development.

    参考文献
    [1] STANSFIELD C A Jr.A note on the urban-nonurban imbalance in American recreational research.The Tourist Review,1964,19(4):196-200. CROUCH G I,RITCHIE J R B.Tourism, competitiveness,and societal prosperity.Journal of Business Research,1999,44(3):137-152. 杨英宝,钱乐祥,苗长虹.旅游竞争研究的回顾与展望.世界地理研究,2002,11(2):88-95. ENRIGHT M J,NEWTON J.Determinants of tourism destination competitiveness in Asia pacific:comprehensiveness and universality.Journal of Travel Research,2005,43(4):339-350. HANAFIAH M H,HEMDI M A,AHMAD I,et al.Tourism core and created resources:Assessment on Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) ranking and tourism performance//HANAFIAH M H,HEMDI M A,AHMAD I,et al. Heritage, Culture and Society.CRC Press,2016: 383-388.DOI:10.1201/9781315386980-68. DELLA CORTE V,D’ANDREA C,SAVASTANO I,et al.Smart cities and destination management:Impacts and opportunities for tourism competitiveness.European Journal of Tourism Research,2017,17:7-27. 苏伟忠,杨英宝,顾朝林.城市旅游竞争力评价初探.旅游学刊,2003,18(3):39-42. 杨勇.我国旅游产业综合竞争力:理论分析、测度体系与实证评价.旅游科学,2012,26(6):42-54. 王慧玲,温艳玲.区域旅游产业竞争力评价研究.经济纵横,2012(12):48-50. 把多勋,徐金海,杨志国.甘肃省14城市旅游竞争力比较研究.干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):194-199. 郭向阳,明庆忠,穆学青,等.云南省边境地区州市旅游竞争力差异与整合研究.世界地理研究,2017,26(5): 147-156. 邹泉.基于投入产出模型的中国各省旅游竞争力研究.国土与自然资源研究,2018(4):51-58. 王丽.基于AHP的城市旅游竞争力评价指标体系的构建及应用研究.地域研究与开发,2014,33(4):105-108. 刘锐.基于熵权集对分析的城市旅游竞争力比较研究:以长江中游城市群四省会城市为例.中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,9(2):35-40. 刘中艳,罗琼.省域城市旅游竞争力测度与评价:以湖南省为例.经济地理,2015,35(4):186-192. 倪向丽.我国省际旅游产业竞争力因子聚类评估.统计与决策,2018,34(21):54-56. 周礼,蒋金亮.长三角城市旅游竞争力综合评价及其空间分异.经济地理,2015,35(1):173-179. 马才巍, Norman Au.中国一线城市旅游竞争力实证及空间分异.东南学术,2016(5):155-162. 张争胜,周永章.城市旅游竞争力的实证研究:以广东省为例.资源开发与市场,2005,21(1):13-16. 傅云新,胡兵.广东省区域旅游竞争力的比较.统计与决策,2011(20):90-92. 吴中山,谨素静,黄海阳.广东城市旅游竞争力评价研究.特区经济,2017(10):68-71. 陈沛然,张落成.广东省城市旅游竞争力评价与发展对策.中国科学院大学学报,2017,34(6):701-711. 郭显光.熵值法及其在综合评价中的应用.财贸研究,1994,5(6):56-60. MORAN P A P.The interpretation of statistical maps.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series b (Methodological),1948,10(2):243-251. ANSELIN L.The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association//ANSELIN L.Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS.Routledge,2019:111-126.DOI:10.1201/9780203739051-8. GETIS A,ORD J K.The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics.Geographical Analysis, 1992,24(3):189-206.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

瞿华,刘荣荣.区域旅游竞争力评价与空间格局演化研究——以广东省21个地市为例[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(4):38-53. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2019.05.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-17
文章二维码