检察行政公益诉讼制度的公正性检视
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D925;D926.3

基金项目:

司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"环境行政公益诉讼路径研究"(18SFB3025);重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费面上项目"新媒体时代司法回应舆论干预对策研究"(106112017CDJXY080006)


On the fairness of administrative public interest litigation system of procuratorate organ
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    检察行政公益诉讼虽为保护公共利益而生,但其在本质上仍然是一种诉讼,在程序规则构造上理应遵循公正原则。目前我国法律和相关司法解释只对检察行政公益诉讼制度作出了原则性规定,尚存在检察机关角色定位模糊、诉讼启动条件具体标准缺乏、举证责任分配规则不明晰等影响诉讼公正性的因素,急需从限制检察机关的恣意性、确保程序的科学性和法官的中立性、保障程序的平等性及行政机关的参与性等方面补强该程序在公正性方面的欠缺,以确保检察行政公益诉讼制度的建构符合诉讼的本质及规律。

    Abstract:

    Although the public interest litigation of procuratorate administration emerges for the protection of public welfare, its essence is still a kind of litigation, and its procedural rules should follow the principle of justice. At present, the law and judicial interpretations only stipulate the principle of the procuratorate administrative public interest litigation system, but there are still some factors that affect the fairness of the litigation, such as the vague role of the procuratorate organ, the lack of specific standards for the initiation of the litigation, and the unclear distribution rules of the burden of proof. It is urgent to strengthen the fairness of the procedure from the aspects of restricting the arbitrariness of procuratorate organs, ensuring the scientificity of procedure and the neutrality of judges, guaranteeing the equality of procedure and the participation of administrative organs, so as to ensure that the construction of procuratorial administrative public interest litigation system conforms to the nature and law of litigation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

金涛,吴如巧.检察行政公益诉讼制度的公正性检视[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(4):184-195. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2020.04.013

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码