《论语》“仁”学体系考论——兼及《论语》思想体系的“内隐”特征
作者:
中图分类号:

B222.1


Textual research on the system of “benevolence” in the Analects of Confucius: And on the “implicit” characteristics of the ideological system of the Analects of Confucius
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《论语》"仁"学论争主要集中于"仁"概念是否具有明确的定义,是否具有体系性。《论语》中孔子以特定语境中的"省略式"清晰阐释了"仁"本质(爱人)及其临近属概念"德",朱熹相关注"仁者,爱之理,心之德"可为证。《论语》中还阐释了"仁"本源(孝弟)、价值(利国利民),并进一步具体阐释为以"爱人"为其内核的"恭、宽、信、敏、惠",以及"己欲立而立人,己欲达而达人",以及"己所不欲勿施于人"和"克己复礼"等实践要求,以"仁在其中""近仁""鲜矣仁""不仁"等形成"边界",与老子、苏格拉底比较,是轴心时代早期最为清晰的概念定义且沿用至今。除了解释"仁是什么",《论语》中还阐释了如何"为仁",何为"仁者",由概念、实践特性与实践主体构成完整的元儒"仁"学体系。《论语》"仁"学立足于实践智慧与社会效益,确立了具有鲜明是非、爱憎且注重利国、利民实绩,既非求全责备、也非徒有虚名的"仁者"条件,对于现代人类伦理构建与社会进步具有重要价值。

    Abstract:

    The debate of "benevolence" in Analects of Confucius mainly focuses on whether the concept of "benevolence" has a clear definition and whether it is systematic. In the Analects of Confucius, the essence of benevolence (loving others) and its adjacent concept "virtue" were clearly explained by "abbreviation" in a specific context. Zhu Xi's relevant notes "A truly benevolent person is kind-hearted and knows how to love others" can be taken as evidence. In the Analects of Confucius, it also explained the origin (filial piety), and function (benefiting the country and the people) of "benevolence", and further explained the practical requirements such as "courtesy, leniency, honesty, diligence and kindness", "I want to stand firm, and also let others stand firm; I want to succeed, and also let others succeed", "don't impose on others what you don't like", and "controlling yourself to restore rites", with "love" as their core. The "boundary" is formed by the concepts of "benevolence in it", "near benevolence", "rarely benevolence" and "non-benevolence". Compared with Laozi and Socrates, it was the clearest definition of the concept in the early axis age and had been used up to now. In addition to the explanation of "what is benevolence", the Analects of Confucius also explained how to "be benevolent" and what was "a benevolent person", which was a complete and original Confucian system of benevolence composed of concept, practice characteristics and practice subjects. Based on practical wisdom and social benefits, the theory of benevolence in the Analects of Confucius established the conditions for becoming a benevolent person: having attitude to right and wrong, love and hate; paying attention to the actual performance of "benefiting the country" and "loving the people", who do not demand perfection, and do not just have a reputation. It has important value for the construction of modern human ethics and social progress.

    参考文献
    [1] 杨伯峻.论语译注(导言)[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
    [2] 冯友兰.论孔子关于"仁"的思想[J].哲学研究,1961(5):63-72,31.
    [3] 陈乔见.苏格拉底与孔子的论说方式及其影响[J].学术月刊,2009(5):60-67.
    [4] 崔平."仁学"传统的方法论迷失:管窥中国儒学的四种无意识[J].南国学术,2018(3):366-375.
    [5] 高赞非.孔子思想的核心:仁[J].文史哲,1962(5):1-12.
    [6] 杜崙."仁学"体系概述[J].中国哲学史,2011(2):27-36.
    [7] 陈来.仁学本体论[J].文史哲,2014(4):41-63,165.
    [8] 乐爱国."孝弟":"仁之本"还是"为仁之本":以朱熹对《论语》"孝弟也者,其为仁之本与"的诠释为中心[J].安徽大学学报(社会科学版),2019(1):37-46.
    [9] 李友广.论孔子"仁"的特性及其对历史人物的评判问题:以《论语》"令尹子文三仕"章为例[J].中国哲学史,2019(1):23-30.
    [10] 姚孝遂.殷墟甲骨刻辞类纂·拼音检索[M].北京:中华书局,1989:36.
    [11] 徐中舒.甲骨文字典·检字[M].成都:四川辞书出版社,2006:1-17.
    [12] 中国社会科学院考古研究所.甲骨文编[M].北京:中华书局,1965:339.
    [13] 张亚初.殷周金文集成引得[M].北京:中华书局,2001:228.
    [14] 高明,涂白奎.古文字类编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:12.
    [15] 蒋善国.尚书综述[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988:236.
    [16] 陈来.古代宗教与伦理:儒家思想的根源[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2017.
    [17] 阮元.研经室集·论语论仁论[M].北京:中华书局,1993.
    [18] 司马迁.史记·五帝本纪赞[M].北京:中华书局,2011:42.
    [19] 朱熹.论语集注[M].四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
    [20] 何晏(注),邢昺(疏).论语注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990.
    [21] 张中宇.《论语》"礼让""去食"考释:兼评儒家政治理想[J].重庆师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):47-54.
    [22] 张中宇.《论语》"有朋""束脩""忠焉"考释:兼论孔子教育思想[J].重庆师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):62-69.
    [23] 胡适.中国哲学史大纲[M].上海:商务印书馆,1919:11.
    [24] 罗根泽.管子探源[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2010:46-47.
    [25] 陈来.论儒家的实践智慧[J].哲学研究,2014(8):36-41,128.
    [26] 辜鸿铭.辜鸿铭讲论语[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2013:315.
    [27] 皇侃.论语义疏[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [28] 钱穆.论语新解[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012.
    [29] 章太炎.广论语骈枝[J].中法大学月刊,1932(2):4-21.
    [30] 杨逢彬.论语新注新译[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:66.
    [31] 朱熹.孟子集注//四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983:375-376.
    [32] 李泽厚.孔子再评价[J].中国社会科学,1980(2):77-96.
    [33] 柏拉图.理想国[M].郭斌和,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1986:43.
    [34] 邓晓芒.苏格拉底与孔子的言说方式比较[J].开放时代,2000(3):39-45.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张中宇.《论语》“仁”学体系考论——兼及《论语》思想体系的“内隐”特征[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(4):237-248. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. sz.2019.11.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:452
  • 下载次数: 1241
  • HTML阅读次数: 2287
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-17
文章二维码