国内国际双循环新发展格局:理论逻辑与内生动力
作者:
中图分类号:

F124

基金项目:

研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社会科学基金专项课题(18VSJ046);中南财经政法大学中长期研究项目(31501710801);中南财经政法大学一流学科重点建设项目(21123541829)


New development pattern of domestic and international dual cycle:Theoretical logic and endogenous power
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着世界经济下行和新冠肺炎疫情持续性蔓延,国际政治经济形势不确定性不稳定性增加。理论逻辑和历史经验告诉我们:构建以国内循环为主体,强调联动循环、主动循环和动态循环的国内国际双循环新发展格局,不仅是大势所趋,更是中国经济可持续发展的内在要求。从本质上看,新格局的形成关键在于构建双循环的内生动力,培育国际合作与竞争新优势。具体而言,就是要以国家战略为依托,利用中国超大规模市场、多层级消费市场和统一大市场等优势,铸就双循环内生市场动力;以自主创新为核心,以制造业服务化为竞争新优势,以数字经济为新契机,打造双循环的产业支撑作用;改善营商环境,培育双循环的企业主体地位,形成供给更高质量、内需更具活力的高水平动态平衡。

    Abstract:

    Faced with the global economic downturn and the continuous spread of COVID-19 epidemic, the uncertainty and instability of the international political and economic situation has increased. Based on theoretical logic and historical experience, it is not only the irreversible trend but also the inherent requirement of China's sustainable development of economy to build a new domestic and international dual cycle development pattern with domestic cycle as the main body, emphasizing linkage cycle, active cycle and dynamic cycle. In essence, the key to the formation of the new pattern lies in building a dual cycle endogenous power and fostering new advantages in international cooperation and competition. Specifically, it is to rely on the national strategy, take advantage of China's super large-scale market, multi-level consumer market and unified large market, to create a dual cycle endogenous market power. This need coordinated work which includes independent innovation as the core, and manufacturing service as the competitive new advantages, and the digital economy as a new opportunity to create a dual cycle industry support role. Moreover, it is important to improve the business environment, foster a dual cycle corporate dominant position, and form a high-level dynamic balance with higher quality supply and more dynamic domestic demand.

    参考文献
    [1] 戴翔,张二震.供给侧结构性改革与中国外贸转型发展[J].贵州社会科学,2016,319(7):131-136.
    [2] 杜焱,柳思维.国家规模、经济增长阶段与需求动力机制结构演变[J].经济与管理研究,2012,33(6):5-12.
    [3] 王建.选择正确的长期发展战略:关于"国际大循环"经济发展战略的构想[N].经济日报,1988-01-05.
    [4] 王子林,翁先定,郭亚洪,等.国民经济内外循环战略的选择:"国际大循环质疑"[J].经济学动态,1988(7):19-23.
    [5] 欧阳峣.大国经济发展理论的研究范式[J].经济学动态,2012(12):48-53.
    [6] 国务院发展研究中心课题组.充分发挥"超大规模性"优势推动我国经济实现从"超大"到"超强"的转变[J].管理世界,2020(1):1-7,44.
    [7] 丁平,张二震.国内需求与国际贸易:一个综述[J].国际贸易问题,2013(2):166-174.
    [8] CHENERY H.Patterns of industrial growth[J].American Economic Review,1960,50(4):624-654.
    [9] 欧阳峣,傅元海,王松.居民消费的规模效应及其演变机制[J].经济研究,2016(2):56-68.
    [10] 钱学锋,王备.异质性企业与贸易政策:一个文献综述[J].世界经济,2018,41(7):169-192.
    [11] 易先忠,欧阳峣.大国如何出口:国际经验与中国贸易模式回归[J].财贸经济,2018(3):79-94.
    [12] AMITI M,DAVIS D R.Trade,firms,and wages:Theory and evidence[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2012,79(1):1-36.
    [13] SHU P,STEINWENDER C.The impact of trade liberalization on firm productivity and innovation[J].Innovation Policy and the Economy,2019,19:39-68.
    [14] MAYER T,MELITZ M,OTTAVIANO G I P.Product mix and firm productivity responses to trade competition[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2016.
    [15] CHEN C,STEINWENDER C.Import competition,heterogeneous preferences of managers,and productivity[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2019.
    [16] BASTOS P,SILVA J,VERHOOGEN E.Export destinations and input prices[J].American Economic Review,2018,108(2):353-392.
    [17] FAN H C,LI Y A,XU S C,et al.Quality, variable markups,and welfare:A quantitative general equilibrium analysis of export prices[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2019.
    [18] 道格拉斯·欧文.贸易的冲突:美国贸易政策200年[M].北京:中信出版集团股份有限公司,2019.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

钱学锋,裴婷.国内国际双循环新发展格局:理论逻辑与内生动力[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(1):14-26. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.09.007

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1387
  • 下载次数: 1691
  • HTML阅读次数: 2445
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-01
文章二维码