The construction of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics and Chinese style has always been the fundamental purpose of the prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences in China. To promote the prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences in colleges and universities, the scientific and effective evaluation of philosophy and social sciences research is indispensable. Adhering to the Party leadership, "Two Acts" orientation and "Double Hundred" policy is the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences. It is necessary for the prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences to adhere to "quality-oriented" and "innovation first". And it is also the requirement of the practice of philosophy and social sciences research evaluation to insist on scientific authority, openness, and transparency. Combined with the three major issues-the debate on the relationship between quantity and quality in the quantitative evaluation, the boundary alienation between academic evaluation and evaluation of scientific research management, and the institutional regulation of academic power and administrative power-in the current evaluation of philosophy and social sciences research in colleges and universities, this paper suggests that we should strengthen the quality assurance mechanism of academic achievements, optimize the working mechanism of academic community, build a long-term mechanism of academic contention, and improve the application mechanism of academic achievements, to promote the construction of scientific, authoritative, open and transparent evaluation system of philosophy and social sciences research, and to further improve the evaluation of philosophy and social sciences research in colleges and universities in the new era.