论大数据在著作权法保护中的冲突与协调
作者:
中图分类号:

D923.41

基金项目:

教育部规划基金项目“大数据资源治理的产权界定及管理机制研究”(19YJAZHO19)


On the conflict and coordination of big data in the protection of copyright law
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    现代网络技术与科技手段使大数据的利用与传播打破了传统的交易模式,使数字时代的盗版行为成为不受时空限制的低成本行为,甚至可能以牺牲“创作”为代价换取信息社会的快速发展。大数据资源法律救济保护的滞后性难题,引发了人们对大数据在著作权法保护中的冲突与协调的思考。为实现对大数据权利人的保护和社会利益最大化目的,文章以大数据及其权属论争为基点,通过法经济学与法哲学的理论范式推演探知大数据的权属划分与价值收益,得出大数据适用于著作权法保护的可行性结论。并借鉴大数据在英美法系与大陆法系法律框架下的经验与共识,解构大数据适用著作权法的助益与阻滞因素,从而尝试以设立“数据权”或与其他法律制度兼容的形式检验法学科学处理现代科学的技术理性,为大数据的法律保护提供更多可能性。

    Abstract:

    The use of modern network technology and scientific and technological methods has broken the traditional transaction model in the use and dissemination of big data, making piracy in the digital age a low-cost dependency that is not limited by time and space, or even sacrificing "creation" for the rapid development of the information society. Facing the lagging problem of the protection of big data resources through legal relief, people are thinking about conflicts and coordination of big data in the protection of copyright law. In order to achieve the purpose of protecting big data rights holders and maximizing social benefits, this paper takes big data and its tenure debate as the starting point, and uses the theoretical paradigm of law economics and legal philosophy to derive the ownership division and value gains of big data. The feasibility conclusion that big data is applicable to the protection of copyright law is drawn. Drawing on the experience and consensus of big data in the legal framework of the common law system and civil law system, deconstructing the benefits and hindrances of the application of copyright law to big data, the paper tries to establish a "data right" or a form compatible with other legal systems to examine the scientific rationality of jurisprudence when facing with modern science, and provide more possibilities for the legal protection of big data.

    参考文献
    [1] 中国人民大学数据工程与知识工程重点实验室.中国信息资源开发利用指数报告(2018)[R].北京:中国人民大学电子版,2019:1487.
    [2] 连玉明,大数据战略重点实验室. 重新定义大数据[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2017:5.
    [3] 姚剑波,杨朝琼.大数据安全与隐私[M].成都:电子科技大学出版社,2017:3.
    [4] 高建伟,牛小凡.科斯《社会成本问题》句读[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2019:56.
    [5] 熊琦.著作权激励机制的法律构造[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:115.
    [6] 黑尔格.法哲学原理[M].范扬,张企泰,译.上海:商务印书馆,1961:57.
    [7] 杨小兰.网络著作权概论[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2012:7.
    [8] 郑成思.版权法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:189.
    [9] 王迁.版权法对技术措施的保护与规制研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018:398.
    [10] 韦之.著作权法原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998:12.
    [11] 朱真真.大数据时代数据公开与知识产权保护的冲突与协调[J].北京:中国科技论坛,2019(3):117-123.
    [12] 杨斌,刘智鹏.论网络授权合同与著作权限制的冲突与协调[J].湖北社会科学,2012(5):152-157.
    [13] De WERRA J.Moving beyond the conflict between freedom of contract and copyright policies:In search of a new global policy for information licensing transactions[J].Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts,2001(4):187-193.
    [14] FRISCHMANN B,MOYLAN D.The evolving common law doctrine of copyright misuse:A unified theory and its application to software[J].Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2000,15(3):865-931.
    [15] 杨亮."大数据"产权的法律分析[J].理论与当代,2019(4):29-31.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

田小楚,高山行.论大数据在著作权法保护中的冲突与协调[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(1):141-151. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2020.04.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:601
  • 下载次数: 1037
  • HTML阅读次数: 1416
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-01
文章二维码