证券投资者保护的社会化
作者:
中图分类号:

F832.51;D922.28

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(CXJJ-2018-356)


The socialization of securities investor protection
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [48]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    从“监管主导”走向“社会保护”能够在规范之内给与证券投资者最高限度且最具实效性的权益保护。传统监管主导型保护痹症在金融危机反思中突显,致力于通过独立性机制设计加强保护的行为监管理念与我国“持股行权”的私法保护实践相结合提供了以专业化保护为进路的制度设计思考。基于此,鉴于商事精神兼容性以及监管保护模式的局限性,证券投资者的保护机制转变应是社会化进路的"私权"激励:即立意于确保保护目标“优位性”以及行为方式“能动性”机理,通过社会化、专业化与自觉性,以及司法保障的激励机制将其嵌入投资者保护制度设计之中,在减轻对公权监管保护路径依赖的同时,激活通过专业化与示范效应推进的社会保护权能,客观上达到一种“保护促进监管”的良性循环。

    Abstract:

    The change from "regulatory protection" to "social protection" of securities investor protection mode can give securities investors the maximum and most effective protection within the norms. The disadvantage of traditional supervision-oriented protection is highlighted in the reflection of financial crisis. The combination of the concept of "conduct regulation" devoted to strengthening the protection through independent mechanism and the practice of private law protection of "shareholding exercise" in China provides a systematic reflection on the way of professional protection. Therefore, based on the compatibility of commercial spirit and the limitation of regulatory protection mode, the transformation of protection mechanism of securities investors should be the "private right" incentive of "socialization" approach. That is, learning from the advantages of conduct regulation in ensuring the "priority" of protection objectives and the "initiative" mechanism of behavior mode, and embedding them into the design of investor protection system by means of the incentive mechanism of socialization, specialization, self-awareness and judicial protection. As a result, while alleviating the dependence on the path of public power regulation, it can activate the social protection power promoted by the specialization and demonstration effect, and objectively achieve a virtuous circle of "protection promoting supervision".

    参考文献
    [1] 南方日报评论员.金融安全是国家安全的重要组成部分[N].南方日报,2017-04-28(F02).
    [2] HAUGEN R A.The inefficient stock market:What pays off and why[M].New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1999:3.
    [3] SHILLER R J.The subprime solution:How today's global financial crisis happened,and what to do about it[J].The American Prospect,2009,20(4):56.
    [4] AKERLOF G A,SHILLER R J.Animal spirits:How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism[M].Princeton(NJ):Princeton University Press,2009:264.
    [5] 戴国强,陈晨.金融消费者保护与金融危机:基于全球142个经济体的实证研究[J].财经研究,2015(3):100-110.
    [6] MELECKY M,SUE R.Financial consumer protection and the global financial crisis[J/OL].https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28201/.
    [7] 张付标.证券投资者适当性制度研究[M].上海:上海三联书店出版社,2015.
    [8] 廖凡.金融消费者的概念和范围:一个比较法的视角[J].环球法律评论,2012,34(4):95-104.
    [9] 缪因知.证券交易场外配资清理整顿活动之反思[J].法学,2016(1):48-57.
    [10] 宋晓燕.证券监管的目标和路径[J].法学研究,2009,31(6):117-134.
    [11] 周友苏,蓝冰.证券行政责任重述与完善[J].清华法学,2010(3):61-65.
    [12] SHLEIFER A,WOLFENZON D.Investor protection and equity markets[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2002,66(1):3-27.
    [13] 周松林.投服中心提起全国首例证券支持诉讼[N].中国证券报,2016-7-25(A02).
    [14] 牛绮思.全国金融工作会议上的新概念:功能监管与行为监管[J].中国经济周刊,2017(29):31.
    [15] SCHMULOW A.Approaches to financial system regulation:An international comparative survey[J/OL].Centre For International Finance and Regulation Research Working Paper Series.
    [16] LLEWELLYN D.The economic rationale for financial regulation[M/OL].FSA Ocasional Paper Series1,1999:11.
    [17] 冯乾,侯合心.金融业行为监管国际模式比较与借鉴:基于"双峰"理论的实践[J].财经科学,2016(5):1-11.
    [18] 廖岷.对危机后银行业"行为监管"的再认识[J].金融监管研究,2012(1):64-74.
    [19] TAYLOR M W.Twin peaks:A regulatory structure for the new century[J].Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation,1995(20):1-77.
    [20] TAYLOR M.The road from "twin peaks" and the way back[J].Connecticut Insurance Law Journal,2009(16):61-96.
    [21] PAN E J.Structural reform of financial regulation[J].Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems,2011,19(3):796-867.
    [22] GODWIN A,LI G,RAMSAY I.Is Australia's twin peaks system of financial regulation a model for China[J].Hong Kong Law Journal,2016,46(2):621-646.
    [23] 孙天琦.金融消费者保护:行为经济学的理论解析与政策建议[J].金融监管研究,2014(4):32-56.
    [24] SCHMULOW A.Financial regulatory governance in South Africa:The move towards twin peaks[J].African Journal of International and Comparative Law,2017,25(3):393-417.
    [25] 雍冀慧.银行业行为监管研究[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2015:66.
    [26] 焦瑾璞.构建中国金融行为监管体系[J].清华金融评论,2015(12):54-55.
    [27] 林越坚.金融消费者:制度本源与法律取向[J].政法论坛,2015,33(1):143-152.
    [28] 何德旭,周宇.中国证券投资者保护机制的创新方向与实现路径[J].金融评论,2015(1):1-9.
    [29] LOWRY J.Policy and theory in the securities reguation[J].商事法论集,2010(Z1):351-372.
    [30] 弗兰克·伊斯特布鲁克,丹尼尔·费希尔.公司法的经济结构[M].张建伟,罗培新,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:17-25.
    [31] STEWART R B.The reformation of american administrative law[J].Harvard Law Review,1975,88(8):1667-1813.
    [32] POSNER R.Theories of economic regulation[J].The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1974,5(2):335-358.
    [33] RAMIREZ,STEVEN A.Depoliticizing financial regulation[J].William and Mary Law Review,2000,41:503-594.
    [34] 章志远.私人参与警察任务执行的法理基础[J].法学研究,2011(6):96-111.
    [35] 陈新民.公法学札记[M].北京:法律出版社,2010:75-77.
    [36] 徐文鸣,朱良玉.中美证券法公共执行机制比较研究:基于监管机构投入产出的实证分析[J].财经法学,2017(3):125-138.
    [37] 楼秋然.上市公司治理的监管模式选择:向"遵守或者解释"规则转变[J].证券市场导报,2017(1):63-70.
    [38] 朱宝琛投服中心:已累计行权4757次[N/OL].(2018-09-13)[2019-04-15].http://www.zqrb.cn/stock/gupiaoyaowen/2018-09-13/A1536840438172.html.
    [39] 周松林.山东金泰抵制投服中心行权投服中心将适时采取措施[N/OL].(2017-06-18)[2017-12-07].http://www.cs.com.cn/sylm/jsbd/201706/t20170618_5329865.html.
    [40] 张付标,李玫.论证券投资者适当性的法律性质[J].法学,2013(10):82-89.
    [41] 刘歆宇.从小抓起,证监会正在推动将投资者教育纳入国民教育体系试点[N/OL].(2017-09-12)[2017-11-22].http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2017-09-12/doc-ifykuftz6536301.shtml.
    [42] 江德斌.证监会主席不宜传授炒股经[N].现代金报,2013-01-18(A02).
    [43] 洪艳蓉.公共管理视野下的证券投资者保护[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(3):58-66.
    [44] 缪因知.政府性证券监管批判及与民事诉讼之权衡[J].交大法学,2015,6(1):142-158.
    [45] 王利明.我国证券法中民事责任制度的完善[J].法学研究,2001,23(4):55-69.
    [46] 吴泽勇.《投资者示范诉讼法》:一个群体性法律保护的完美方案?[J].中国法学,2010(1):146-160.
    [47] 杨瑞.示范诉讼制度探析:兼论我国代表人诉讼制度之完善[J].现代法学,2007,29(5):74-80.
    [48] 熊锦秋.证券期货示范诉讼制度值得探索试点[N].证券时报,2017-09-06(A03).
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

石超.证券投资者保护的社会化[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(1):177-190. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2019.07.001

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2019-05-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-01
文章二维码