2025年6月3日 周二
期刊社主页编辑部首页编委会数据库收录过刊浏览联系我们期刊荣誉
首页 > 过刊浏览>2021年第27卷第5期 >87-98. DOI:10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.jg.2020.04.005
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
研发伙伴类型、独占性机制与企业突破性创新的实证研究
作者:
中图分类号:

F270;F273;F425

基金项目:

国家自然科学青年基金项目"后发企业的实际独占性机制以及开放度的耦合关系研究"（71702170）；国家自然科学基金项目"基于科学/经验学习双重嵌入的我国制造企业技术能力跃迁路径研究"（71202139）；教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"基于多维技术搜寻的企业自主创新能力升级路径研究"（17YJA630023）；浙江省自然科学基金项目"企业多维技术搜寻与自主创新能力构建：形成及演进机制研究"（LY18G020016）；国家社会科学基金项目"企业社会责任与创新社会治理体制研究"（15BSH107）；浙江理工大学"青年创新专项"项目"企业社会责任双元行为对企业价值的影响机理：市场竞争的视角"（2019Q095）


Empirical research on R&D partner type, appropriability mechanism and radical innovation
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [57]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章聚焦于"企业如何借助外部研发伙伴力量促进企业突破性创新"这一研究问题，以中国241家制造型企业为研究对象，实证探索了不同类型的研发伙伴对企业突破性创新的影响，以及正式独占性机制和非正式独占性机制的调节作用。研究发现：企业与高校、研究院所等科学型研发伙伴的合作互动强度越高，对企业的突破性创新的正向影响越强；企业与客户、供应商等价值链研发伙伴的合作互动对突破性创新也有显著正向影响；企业的非正式独占性机制正向调节外部研发伙伴与企业突破性创新的关系，这说明企业从合作创新中受益的程度取决于自身采取的创新独占性机制的类型和强弱。

    Abstract:

    This research focuses on the problem of how to promote radical innovation of enterprises during the process of collaborative innovation. Taking 241 manufacturing enterprises in China as the research object, this paper empirically explores the impact of different types of R&D partners on enterprises' radical innovation and the moderation role of formal/informal appropriability mechanism. The study finds that:1) the higher the collaboration intensity with universities and research institutions is, the stronger the positive impact on enterprises' radical innovations is; 2) Collaboration with users and suppliers also has significant positive impact on radical innovation; 3) The informal appropriability mechanism of enterprises positively moderates the relationship between external R&D collaborative partners and radical innovation of enterprises. It shows that the extent to which an enterprise benefits from collaborative innovation depends on the type and strength of the innovation appropriability mechanism it adopts.

    参考文献
    [1] NORMAN D A, VERGANTI R.Incremental and radical innovation:design research vs. technology and meaning change[J]. Design Issues, 2014, 30(1):78-96.
    [2] RUBERA G, KIRCA A H.Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes:a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2012, 76(3):130-147.
    [3] SUBRAMANIAM M, YOUNDT M A.The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(3):450-463.
    [4] WEST J, BOGERS M.Leveraging external sources of innovation:a review of research on open innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(4):814-831.
    [5] ALMIRALL E, CASADESUS-MASANELL R.Open versus closed innovation:a model of discovery and divergence[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(1):27-47.
    [6] ENKEL E, GASSMANN O, CHESBROUGH H.Open R&D and open innovation:exploring the phenomenon[J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(4):311-316.
    [7] OAKEY R P.Open innovation and its relevance to industrial research and development:The case of high-technology small firms[J]. International Small Business Journal:Researching Entrepreneurship, 2013, 31(3):319-336.
    [8] BODAS FREITAS I M, MARQUES R A, DE PAULA E SILVA E M.University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(2):443-453.
    [9] 郭爱芳, 陈劲.科学学习和经验学习:概念、特征及理论意义[J]. 技术经济, 2012(6):16-20, 49.
    [10] FITJAR R D, RODRÍGUEZ-POSE A.Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(1):128-138.
    [11] COHEN W M, NELSON R R, WALSH J P.Links and impacts:the influence of public research on industrial R&D[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1):1-23.
    [12] HOWELLS J, RAMLOGAN R, CHENG S L.Innovation and university collaboration:paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2012, 36(3):703-721.
    [13] BEISE M, STAHL H.Public research and industrial innovations in Germany[J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28(4):397-422.
    [14] BALDWIN J R, HANEL P.Innovation and knowledge creation in an open economy:Canadian industry and international implications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    [15] FLEMING L, SORENSON O.Science as a map in technological search[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(89):909-928.
    [16] VAN BEERS C, ZAND F.R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance:an empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2):292-312.
    [17] TSAI K H, TSAI M L, WANG J C.Supplier collaboration and new product performance:a contingency model[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2012, 112(2):268-289.
    [18] DYER J H, NOBEOKA K.Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):345-367.
    [19] CRICELLI L, GRIMALDI M.Knowledge-based inter-organizational collaborations[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2010, 14(3):348-358.
    [20] HURMELINNA P, KYLÄHEIKO K, JAUHIAINEN T.The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations:Theoretical re-appraisal and empirical analysis[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(3):133-144.
    [21] PISANO G.Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(8):1122-1130.
    [22] 闫春, 蔡宁.创新开放度对开放式创新绩效的作用机理[J]. 科研管理, 2014(3):18-24.
    [23] HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN P, RITALA P.Appropriability as the driver of internationalization of service-oriented firms[J]. The Service Industries Journal, 2012, 32(7):1039-1056.
    [24] CHESBROUGH H W.Why companies should have open business models[J]. MIT Sloan management review, 2007, 48(2):22.
    [25] HAGEDOORN J, RIDDER A K.Open innovation, contracts, and intellectual property rights:an exploratory empirical study[R].SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1974668.
    [26] ALEXY O, HENKEL J.Promoting the penguin:Intraorganizational implications of open innovation[R].Social Science Research Network, 2009:1-55.
    [27] LAURSEN K, SALTER A J.The paradox of openness:Appropriability, external search and collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5):867-878.
    [28] HENKEL J, FISCHER T.Contingencies of profiting from innovation:Appropriability mechanisms' non-linearities[C]//Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014.
    [29] NEUHÄUSLER P.The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms-Differences between sectors and among companies[J]. Technovation, 2012, 32(12):681-693.
    [30] PAASI J, LUOMA T, VALKOKARI K, et al.Knowledge and intellectual property management in customer-supplier relationships[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, 14(4):629-654.
    [31] MANZINI R, LAZZAROTTI V.Intellectual property protection mechanisms in collaborative new product development[J]. R&D Management, 2016, 46(S2):579-595.
    [32] ZOBEL A K, LOKSHIN B, HAGEDOORN J.Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms:The role of openness and innovativeness[J]. Technovation, 2017, 59:44-54.
    [33] JAMES S D, LEIBLEIN M J, LU S H.How firms capture value from their innovations[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(5):1123-1155.
    [34] KEUPP M M, BECKENBAUER A, GASSMANN O.How managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies[J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(2):211-224.
    [35] ZABY A K.Losing the lead:the patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2010, 19(2):147-164.
    [36] KEUPP M M, BECKENBAUER A, GASSMANN O.Enforcing intellectual property rights in weak appropriability regimes[J]. Management International Review, 2010, 50(1):109-130.
    [37] 潘铁, 柳卸林.跨国公司在中国的研发独占性研究:基于非法律保护手段选择的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009(8):5-12.
    [38] 魏江, 李拓宇, 胡胜蓉, 等.专业服务业创新独占性机制及其作用机理[J]. 科学学研究, 2018(2):324-333.
    [39] ZHAO M Y.Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(8):1185-1199.
    [40] KEUPP M M, FRIESIKE S, VON ZEDTWITZ M.How do foreign firms patent in emerging economies with weak appropriability regimes?Archetypes and motives[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(8):1422-1439.
    [41] GARRIGA H, VON KROGH G, SPAETH S.How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(9):1134-1144.
    [42] AGOSTINI L, NOSELLA A, SORANZO B.The impact of formal and informal appropriability regimes on SME profitability in medium high-tech industries[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2015, 27(4):405-419.
    [43] STEENSMA H K, CORLEY K G.On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships:the interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(6):1045-1067.
    [44] FAEMS D, VAN LOOY B, DEBACKERE K.Interorganizational collaboration and innovation:toward a portfolio approach[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2005, 22(3):238-250.
    [45] NIETO M J, SANTAMARÍA L.The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(6/7):367-377.
    [46] FOSS N J, LAURSEN K, PEDERSEN T.Linking customer interaction and innovation:the mediating role of new organizational practices[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(4):980-999.
    [47] ZENG S X, XIE X M, TAM C M.Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(3):181-194.
    [48] ATUAHENE-GIMA K.Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4):61-83.
    [49] ZHOU K Z, LI C B.How knowledge affects radical innovation:Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9):1090-1102.
    [50] FRANKORT H T W, HAGEDOORN J, LETTERIE W.R&D partnership portfolios and the inflow of technological knowledge[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2012, 21(2):507-537.
    [51] HALL B, HELMERS C, ROGERS M, et al.The choice between formal and informal intellectual property:a review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2014, 52(2):375-423.
    [52] AHUJA G.The duality of collaboration:inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):317-343.
    [53] OWEN-SMITH J, POWELL W W.Knowledge networks as channels and conduits:the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(1):5-21.
    [54] PATEL P C, VAN DER HAVE R P.Enhancing innovation performance through exploiting complementarity in search breadth and depth[J]. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2010, 30(9):1.
    [55] BELDERBOS R, DUYSTERS G, SABIDUSSI A.R&D collaboration and innovative performance[M]//Innovation and Growth.New York:Oxford University Press, 2012:160-181.
    [56] LEIPONEN A, BYMA J.If You cannot block, you better run:Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(9):1478-1488.
    [57] 万鹏宇, 王弘钰, 汲海锋.产业技术创新战略联盟中的突破式创新研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2020(1):96-105.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

阳银娟,郭爱芳,张宏.研发伙伴类型、独占性机制与企业突破性创新的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(5):87-98. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.04.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:491
  • 下载次数: 937
  • HTML阅读次数: 1073
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-11-05
文章二维码

您是本站第 10474773 访问者

通信地址：重庆市沙坪坝区沙正街174号，重庆大学A区

邮编：400044

电话：023-65102306；023-65111861 E-mail：shekexeb@cqu.edu.cn

版权所有：重庆大学学报社会科学版 ® 2025 版权所有