科技金融数字化对科技型中小企业融资能力影响研究——基于异质性实现形式视角
作者:
中图分类号:

F49;F830.1;F832.2;F276.3;F275

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"供给侧结构性改革背景下长江经济带市场化生态补偿机制培育研究"(18CJL024);江西师范大学青年英才培育资助计划项目"科技型中小企业融资能力的提升路径研究:基于科技金融数字化视角"(QNYC2018005203)


Research on the influence of digitalization of science and technology finance on financing ability of small and medium-sized enterprises: Based on the perspective of heterogeneity realization form
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [29]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    虽然科技型中小企业的融资困境引发了广泛关注,但从数字化视角出发的研究较少。有鉴于此,文章以信息经济学的相关理论为指导,综合采用比较静态分析技术和系统分析方法,对科技金融数字化的实现形式进行了归纳总结,并对不同科技金融数字化实现形式影响科技型中小企业融资能力的作用机理进行了逻辑推演。在此基础上,结合我国科技金融数字化发展实践,对科技金融数字化驱动科技型中小企业融资能力提升所面临的挑战进行了深入剖析,研究结果表明:不同科技金融数字化实现形式,对科技型中小企业融资能力的影响路径和影响机理存在显著差别,其中"科技金融+数字技术"对科技型中小企业融资能力的影响主要通过"科技金融业务创新"进行传导,而"数字技术+科技金融"则主要以"互联网科技金融创新"为媒介。通过进一步研究发现,"科技金融业务创新"推动了科技金融机构信息搜寻技术的变革,改善了信息结构,优化了信贷决策的信息环境,增强了"逆向选择风险"规避能力,促进了科技型中小企业融资能力的增长。与此相对,"互联网科技金融创新"则有利于增强科技金融体系的亲科技型中小企业特性,降低科技金融门槛;提高科技金融体系的产品创新能力,增强对科技金融需求的适配性;丰富科技金融模式类型,增强科技金融体系的稳健性,推动科技型中小企业融资能力的增长。此外,科技金融数字化发展也导致了"逆向选择风险"规避能力的漏损,诱发了科技金融主体的认知混乱,触发了科技金融监管缺口,抑制了科技型中小企业融资能力的增长。

    Abstract:

    Although the financing dilemma of small and medium-sized scientific and technological enterprises has attracted extensive attention, while few research paid attention to the dilemma from the perspective of digitization, for this reason, the authors made an theoretical research on influence of digitalization of science and technology finance on financing ability of small and medium-sized enterprise(FASME) by utilizing the comparative method and system analysis tools. Firstly, the authors summarized the realization form of DST, after that, they deduced the mechanism that digitalization of science and technology finance affects the finance ability of small and medium-sized enterprise, at last the authors deployed the challenges faced by science and technology enterprise during the driving process. The results show that, there are significant differences in the influence path and mechanism for different forms of digital realization and among which, the influence of "finance of science and technology+digital technology" is mainly transmitted by "science and technology finance business innovation", while internet science and technology finance innovation for "finance science and technology +digital technology". Through further research, it is found that "innovation of science and technology financial business" promotes the change of information search technology as well as improves the information structure, as a result it optimizes the information environment of credit decision-making and enhances the reverse selection risk avoidance ability. In contrast, the internet science and technology financial innovation is conducive to enhancing the characteristics of science and technology financial system which can reduce the threshold of science and technology finance. Meanwhile, it also can improve the product innovation ability of science and technology financial system and enhance the adaptability of science and technology financial demand. What’s more, the digitalization process enriches the types of science and technology financial models and enhances the robustness of science and technology financial system. In addition, the digitalization development of science and technology finance also leads to the leakage of "adverse selection risk" avoidance ability as well as induces the cognitive confusion of finance agent, what’s worse, it also triggers the supervision gap which restrained the improvement of FASMSE.

    参考文献
    [1] 李华军,何奇颖.广东省科技型中小企业融资现状调查及分析:以粤西地区为例[J].商业会计,2019(1):45-48.
    [2] 戚聿东,褚席.数字经济视阈下法定数字货币的经济效益与风险防范[J].改革,2019(11):52-62.
    [3] 张巾.金融行业数字化转型的现状、挑战与建议[J].信息通信技术与政策,2019(9):39-41.
    [4] 赵文昌.科技金融[M].北京:北京科学出版社,2009:26.
    [5] 陆岷峰.金融科技与科技金融:相互赋能与共生发展策略研究:基于科技、金融、经济生态圈视角[J].金融教育研究,2020(1):17-23.
    [6] 廖传惠,杨渝南,陈永华.互联网金融、公共科技金融与科技型小微企业融资[J].科学管理研究,2015(2):97-100.
    [7] 谢泗薪,张志博.基于互联网思维的科技金融服务业发展模式与攻略[J].中国科技论坛,2016(3):55-61.
    [8] 赵毅.借力大数据平台实现科技金融创新[J].金融电子化,2017(2):71-73.
    [9] 王洁,魏生,戴科冕.基于区块链的科技金融大数据开放共享体系研究[J].现代计算机(专业版),2018(22):52-58, 78.
    [10] 陆岷峰.数字经济背景下商业银行发展定位与战略研究[J].天津商业大学学报,2019(6):22-29.
    [11] 李文峰.现代农业商业性金融供给的技术演进动因研究:基于"金融+互联网"科技金融发展视角[J].投资研究,2016(11):112-120.
    [12] 俞丹丹,余婷婷,毕诗琪.互联网背景下安徽省科技金融机制优化探析[J].商业经济,2019(1):61-62.
    [13] 王炜,李睿."技数"改变金融服务模式:浙江网商银行的数字化实践[J].银行家,2019(1):88-90.
    [14] STIGLITS J E,WEISS A.Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J].American Economic Review,1981,7l (3):393-410.
    [15] 霍娜.人工智能加持金融数字化转型[N].中国信息化周报,2018-12-03(21).
    [16] 崔恺媛,刘一鸣,刘璐.信息不对称视角下科技金融服务新旧动能转换的风险成因分析[J].山东社会科学,2019(11):153-158.
    [17] 杨智慧,肖志源.科技金融服务信息合作平台构建及运行研究[J].科学管理研究,2016(2):90-94.
    [18] 黄晓红,樊艳甜,刘翔.基于SCP范式的互联网金融市场分析:以P2P网贷行业为例[J].经济与管理,2020(3):44-51.
    [19] 钟成林,胡雪萍.大数据驱动消费结构转型升级的作用机理及政策支持体系研究[J].经济问题探索,2019(1):183-190.
    [20] 陆敏.借力数字化推进普惠金融转型[N].经济日报,2019-01-18(9).
    [21] 杨海平.大数据与商业银行小微金融数字化管理[J].清华金融评论,2015(1):69-74.
    [22] 李明富.数字化转型深化,计算成为新动能:浪潮商用机器助力金融行业数字化转型[J].金融电子化,2019(2):92-93.
    [23] 黄奇帆.数字化、区块链重塑全球金融生态[J].全球化,2019(12):9-15,134.
    [24] 李保旭.北京农商银行探索构建数字化金融体系[J].中国金融电脑,2020(1):22-25.
    [25] 朱宝琛.数字化手段怎样让金融更"普惠"?[N].证券日报,2016-09-06(A02).
    [26] 邱寒.金融科技助力银行业数字化转型[J].甘肃金融,2019(11):4-7.
    [27] 汪学军.小微企业金融服务数字化转型研究[J].农村金融研究,2019(11):76-80.
    [28] 徐向艺,牛卫东,魏巍.互联网金融商业模式选择:效率性提高会带来颠覆性创新吗?[J].东岳论丛,2020(1):157-163.
    [29] 曹汉平.数字化银行转型:以"千人千面"的金融服务新模式为例[J].中国经济报告,2020(1):93-100.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

钟成林,胡雪萍.科技金融数字化对科技型中小企业融资能力影响研究——基于异质性实现形式视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(6):46-58. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.11.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:466
  • 下载次数: 1068
  • HTML阅读次数: 1443
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-12-20
文章二维码