2025年6月26日 周四
期刊社主页编辑部首页编委会数据库收录过刊浏览联系我们期刊荣誉
首页 > 过刊浏览>2021年第27卷第6期 >111-124. DOI:10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.pj.2021.08.001
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
一种时间维度的论文影响力评价研究——基于ammaa算法的改进
作者:
中图分类号:

G350;G644.4

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"基于用户行为动机的Altmetrics评价模型构建与实证研究"（18BTQ075）


A time-dimension paper influence evaluation research:Improvement based on ammaa algorithm
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对目前h指数存在的不足，学界尚缺乏一种综合有效的评价指标，为此，笔者期待介绍一种论文评价的ammaa算法，并提出一种融入时间维度的优化算法，即t_ammaa算法，通过对论文影响力的评价来反映学者个人的影响力评价。研究过程中，以Web of Science作为数据源，聚焦国内图情领域作者发文，计算论文ammaa值及t_ammaa值，进而得出学者的ammaa值及t_ammaa值，并将两种算法结果排名与学者H值排名通过归一化处理，进行实证对比分析。结果表明：t_ammaa算法综合考虑发文被引次数、被引次数的阙值限制、合著者人数及论文被引时间的异质性，既可以对独著和合著论文影响力进行综合性评价，也可以消除时间因素带来的影响，是一种更为合理的学者和论文影响力评价计量方法。

    Abstract:

    Aiming at the deficiency of h index and the lack of a comprehensive and effective evaluation index, this paper introduces an ammaa algorithm for paper evaluation, and proposes an optimization algorithm integrating time dimension: t-ammaa algorithm, which reflects the influence evaluation of individual scholars through the evaluation of paper influence. Using Web of Science as the data source and focusing on the papers published by domestic authors in the field of library and information science, the ammaa value and t-ammaa value of these papers are calculated, and then the ammaa value and t-ammaa value of the scholars are obtained. The result ranking of the two algorithms and the scholars’ H-value ranking are normalized for empirical comparison and analysis. The results show that t-ammaa algorithm considers the cited times, the cited threshold limit, co-author number and the temporal heterogeneity of the cited papers. It can not only comprehensively evaluate the influence of single-author and co-authored paper, but also eliminate the influence brought by time factor. It is a more reasonable measurement method for evaluating the influence of scholars and papers.

    参考文献
    [1] 马瑞敏,张慧.加权引用视角下的作者学术影响评价研究[J].情报学报,2017(8):790-797.
    [2] POLYAKOV M,POLYAKOV S,IFTEKHAR M S.Does academic collaboration equally benefit impact of research across topics?The case of agricultural, resource, environmental and ecological economics[J].Scientometrics,2017,113(3):1385-1405.
    [3] GAZNI A, SUGIMOTO C R,DIDEGAH F.Mapping world scientific collaboration:Authors, institutions, and countries[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(2):323-335.
    [4] SHABAN S.Multiple authorship trends in prestigious journals from 1950 to 2005[J].Saudi Medical Journal,2007,28(6):927-932.
    [5] WAGER E,SINGHVI S, KLEINERT S.Too much of a good thing?An observational study of prolific authors[J].PeerJ,2015(3):e1154.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1154.
    [6] JACK G.Is mass authorship destroying the credibility of papers[ED/OL].[2020-11-09]. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/mass-authorship-destroying-credibilitypapers#node-comments.
    [7] SARNA-WOJCICKI D,PERRET M,EITZEL M V,et al.Where are the missing coauthors?Authorship practices in participatory research[J].Rural Sociology, 2017,82(4):713-746.
    [8] 高晓培,潘云涛,马峥.科技期刊论文署名规范化探讨与实践研究[J].编辑学报,2012(1):30-33.
    [9] IRIBARREN-MAESTRO I,LASCURAIN-SÁNCHEZ M L,SANZ-CASADO E.Are multi-authorship and visibility related?Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid[J].Scientometrics,2009,79(1):191-200.
    [10] TARNOW E.Coauthorship in physics[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,2002,8(1):175-190.
    [11] ILAKOVAC V,FISTER K,MARUSIC M,et al.Reliability of disclosure forms of authors'contributions[J].CMAJ,2007,176(1):41-46.
    [12] YAGER K.Each co-author should sign to reduce risk of fraud[J].Nature,2007,450(7170):610.
    [13] BHARATHI D G.Measuring the impact of an author of multi-authored articles-Aggregating metrics for multiple authors'analysis[J].ISSI,2019,2(5):448-458.
    [14] HIRSCH J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
    [15] BALL P.Index aims for fair ranking of scientists[J].Nature,2005,436(7053):900.
    [16] 周春雷.h指数合作式注水缺陷与对策[J].图书情报知识,2009(3):109-112.
    [17] BORNMANN L,DANIEL H D.Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?[J].Scientometrics, 2005,65(3):391-392.
    [18] COSTAS R,BORDONS M.The h-index:Advantages,limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level[J].Journal of Informetrics,2007,1(3):193-203.
    [19] WILDGAARD L,SCHNEIDER J W,LARSEN B.A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(1):125-158.
    [20] 金碧辉,Rousseau Ronald.R指数、AR指数:h指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007(3):1-8.
    [21] PRATHAP G.The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index[J].Scientometrics, 2010,84(1):167-172.
    [22] HU X J,ROUSSEAU R,CHEN J.In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices[J].Journal of Information Science,2010,36(1):73-85.
    [23] SHEN H W,BARABASI A L.Collective credit allocation in science[J].PNAS,2014,111(34):12325-12330.
    [24] BATISTA P D,CAMPITELI M G,KINOUCHI O.Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?[J].Scientometrics,2006,68(1):179-189.
    [25] SCHREIBER M.To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts[J].New Journal of Physics, 2008,10(4).
    [26] SAHOO S.Analyzing research performance:Proposition of a new complementary index[J].Scientometrics, 2016,108(2):489-504.
    [27] 俞立平.期刊影响力指标的时间异质性及其重构研究:基于多属性评价的视角[J].图书情报工作,2016(12):109-114.
    [28] 谢瑞霞.基于"时间异质性"和"合著网络"的作者影响力评价研究[D].曲阜:曲阜师范大学, 2019.
    [29] 舒予,张黎俐.时序动态视角下的学术影响力评价方法及实证研究[J].现代情报,2017(11):74-80,86.
    [30] 科普中国.加权[EB/PL].[2020-10-09].https://baike.baidu.com/item/加权/91816?fr=Aladdin.
    [31] National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation,Clarivate Analytics.China's international scientific research collaboration-A bibliometric analysis[R].2018:1-69.
    [32] 张雪,张志强,陈秀娟.基于期刊论文的作者合作特征及其对科研产出的影响:以国际医学信息学领域高产作者为例[J].情报学报,2019(1):29-37.
    [33] THELWALL M,SUD P.National,disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact:Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2016,10(1):48-61.
    [34] 张欣,马瑞敏.基于改进Page Rank算法的核心专利发现研究[J].图书情报工作,2018(10):106-115.
    [35] 方卿,王珏.开放存取期刊学术质量评价(一):基于总被引频次视角的分析[J].出版学,2011(6):67-70.
    [36] PASTERKAMP G,ROTMANS J I,KLEIJN D V P,et al.Citation frequency:A biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2007,70(1):153-165.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

许恩平,贾娜,李敏,余以胜.一种时间维度的论文影响力评价研究——基于ammaa算法的改进[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(6):111-124. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2021.08.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:445
  • 下载次数: 1220
  • HTML阅读次数: 768
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-12-20
文章二维码

您是本站第 10508772 访问者

通信地址：重庆市沙坪坝区沙正街174号，重庆大学A区

邮编：400044

电话：023-65102306；023-65111861 E-mail：shekexeb@cqu.edu.cn

版权所有：重庆大学学报社会科学版 ® 2025 版权所有