逆城镇化、乡贤回归与乡村振兴——基于浙中X村的田野调查
作者:
中图分类号:

F299.2;F323;D422.6

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"风险社会视域中农村治理现代化研究"(20BGL214);陕西省自然科学基金项目"地方依恋、柔性治理与合村并居中农户决策行为研究"(2021JM-111);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"乡村振兴背景下柔性治理的运作机理及实践路径研究"(21XJC840004)


Anti-urbanization,return of local worthies and rural revitalization:Field investigation based on X village in central region of Zhejiang Province
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [30]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    乡村全面振兴,关键在人才振兴。乡村振兴战略实施过程中,城乡之间资本、人力、技术等要素资源的流动不断加剧,为乡村发展提供新契机。回归乡贤作为逆城镇化中的重要力量,具备城市与乡村双重社会经历,是城乡社会有机循环目标实现的重要纽带。其不仅为农村发展带来人口红利,催生新的经济增长点;而且会重整农村社会劳力外流后的空心结构、调节"城市中心-乡村边缘"的非对称关系格局,促进乡村全面振兴目标的实现。文章选取典型案例,运用田野调查方法,从乡村振兴现实出发,按照"逆城镇化→乡贤回归→乡村振兴"的逻辑理路,构建逆城镇化、乡贤回归与乡村振兴内在关联的理论分析框架,回答了逆城镇化如何与乡村振兴有机联系起来、乡贤回归如何影响乡村振兴、乡贤回归在乡村振兴中作用效应的问题。根据对乡村振兴样态的具体考察,系统说明浙江省X村由城回乡的新乡贤H所带来的要素融合与城乡关系重塑、思维转换与村落价值激活、秩序回归与治理有效实现综合效应。从发展基础、循环条件、作用手段出发,分析乡贤回归对乡村振兴的影响机理,进一步得出逆城镇化背景下乡村振兴目标实现的内在逻辑。其中,回归乡贤的资本富集优势、现代理念凸显构成行动资源的供给基础,社会联结紧密、德治效应明显是乡土逻辑助力的集中体现,创新治理技术、公共理性建构是对乡村伦理基础的再建。可见,城乡经济结构转型过程中,回归乡贤对农村社会的建构力不可忽视,为乡村振兴战略实施提供实践先导。本文认为,城乡必须是双向流通的,城乡关系必须是对等的,城乡融合体制机制必须是具备现实可行性的。现阶段实施乡村振兴战略,关键要抓住城乡融合发展的历史新机遇,构建行之有效的城乡融合体系。乡贤回归这一重要形式,有力回答了逆城镇化与城乡融合发展一致性的疑问,也为探索城乡融合发展形式、乡村有效治理基础以及完善乡村振兴制度框架提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    The key to the overall revitalization of the countryside lies in the revitalization of talents. During the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the flow of capital, human capital, technology and other essential resources between urban and rural areas has been intensified, providing new opportunities for rural development. As an important force in anti-urbanization, the returned rural talents have dual social experience in urban and rural areas, and are important links for the realization of the organic recycling between urban and rural societies. The returned rural talents will not only bring demographic dividends to rural development and give birth to new economic growth points, but also reorganize the hollow structure of rural society after the outflow of labor, adjust the asymmetrical pattern of "city as the center and country as the edge", and eventually promote the realization of the goal of comprehensive revitalization of villages. The article selects typical cases, uses field research methods, starts from the reality of rural revitalization, and constructs a theoretical analysis framework for the internal connection between anti-urbanization, return of rural talents, and rural revitalization, according to the logical path of "anti-urbanization → the return of rural talents → rural revitalization". The following questions are answered:how to organically link anti-urbanization with rural revitalization, how does the return of rural talents affect rural revitalization, and how the return of rural talent plays a role in rural revitalization. According to the specific investigation of the rural rejuvenation pattern, the article systematically explains the comprehensive effects brought by new rural talent H in X Village, Zhejiang Province. These include the integration of elements and the reshaping of the relationship between urban and rural areas, the transformation of thinking and the activation of village's value, the return of order and the effective realization of governance. From development basis, cycle conditions and means of action, this paper analyzes the impact mechanism of the return of rural talents to rural revitalization, and further draws the internal logic of rural revitalization under the background of anti-urbanization. Specifically, capital-rich advantages and prominent modern concepts of the returned rural talents constitute the basis of action resources; the close social connection and the obvious effect of the rule of virtue are the concentrated expression of the help of rural logic; innovative governance technology and the construction of public rationality are the reconstruction of the rural ethics. It can be seen that, in the process of urban and rural economic structural transformation, the constructive power of the returned rural talents to rural society cannot be ignored. They provide practical guidance for the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy. This article proposes that urban and rural areas must flow in a two-way circulation, the relationship between urban and rural areas must be equal, and the system and mechanism of urban-rural integration must be realistic and feasible. At this stage, the key to implementing the rural revitalization strategy is to seize the new historical opportunities for the development of urban-rural integration and build an effective system of urban-rural integration. This important form of the return of rural talents effectively answers the question of the consistency of anti-urbanization and urban-rural integration, and provides a scientific basis for exploring the form of urban-rural integration, the basis for effective rural governance, and the improvement of the framework of rural revitalization.

    参考文献
    [1] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二○三五年远景目标的建议[EB/OL].(2020-11-04)[2021-07-08].http://china.cnr.cn/news/20201104/t20201104_525318774.shtml.
    [2] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于加快推进乡村人才振兴的意见》[EB/OL].(2021-02-23)[2021-07-08]. http://news.cctv.com/2021/02/23/ARTI5jtjH1ClUQflUvZDP1LF210223.shtml?spm=C94212.PBZrLs0D62ld.EKoevbmLqVHC.251.
    [3] 厉以宁.农民工、新人口红利与人力资本革命[J].改革,2018(6):5-12.
    [4] 霍华德.明日的田园城市[M].金经元,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:11.
    [5] BERRY B J L.Urbanization and Counter-urbanization[M].London:Sage Publications,1976:34.
    [6] STARK O,TAYLOR J E.Migration incentives,migration types:the role of relative deprivation[J].The Economic Journal, 1991, 101(408):1163-1178.
    [7] VARTIAINEN P.Counterurbanisation:a challenge for socio-theoretical geography[J].Journal of Rural Studies,1989,5(3):217-225.
    [8] DUTTON W H.Book review:The network society:a cross-cultural perspective[J].New Media&Society,2005,7(6):857-860.
    [9] 张强,霍露萍,祝炜.城乡融合发展、逆城镇化趋势与乡村功能演变[J].经济纵横,2020(9):63-69.
    [10] 唐丽桂."城归"、"新村民"与乡村人才回流机制构建[J].现代经济探讨,2020(3):117-122.
    [11] 齐红倩,席旭文,刘岩.福利约束与农业转移人口逆城镇化倾向[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(1):16-25.
    [12] 张慧.中产阶层逆城镇化生活方式研究[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2018(2):92-101.
    [13] 夏金梅,孔祥利."城归"现象:价值定位、实践基础及引导趋向[J].经济学家,2019(12):58-67.
    [14] 姜方炳. "乡贤回归":城乡循环修复与精英结构再造[J].浙江社会科学,2018(10):71-78.
    [15] 刘传俊,姚科艳.乡村振兴背景下乡贤文化的时代价值与建设路径[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):14-20,160.
    [16] 吴家虎.内生权威融入式治理:体制型乡贤治村的时代价值与完善路径[J].社会科学家,2018(4):57-63.
    [17] 姜方炳.从革命到改革:政治话语流变中的"乡贤之治"及其行动伦理[J].浙江社会科学,2021(6):88-94,159.
    [18] 李晓斐.当代乡贤:理论、实践与培育[J].理论月刊,2018(2):161-166.
    [19] 高静,龚燕玲,武彤.新时代乡贤治村的嵌入逻辑与现实检验:双案例对照[J].农业经济问题,2021(4):110-120.
    [20] 钱再见,汪家焰. "人才下乡":新乡贤助力乡村振兴的人才流入机制研究[J].中国行政管理,2019(2):92-97.
    [21] 张静.案例分析的目标:从故事到知识[J].中国社会科学,2018(8):126-142,207.
    [22] 陈龙.中国特色小农振兴道路:战略方向、路径选择与政策保障[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(1):72-79.
    [23] 费孝通.乡土中国·生育制度·乡土重建[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011:399.
    [24] 段龙龙.新型城镇化与乡村振兴协同发展路径:逆城镇化视角[J].现代经济探讨,2021(5):10-16.
    [25] 王杰.新乡贤是传统乡贤的现代回归吗?[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020(6):119-128.
    [26] 马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:81,238-241.
    [27] SHUE V.The reach of the state:sketches of the Chinese body politics[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1988.
    [28] 徐勇.民主与治理:村民自治的伟大创造与深化探索[J].当代世界与社会主义,2018(4):28-32.
    [29] 张乾友.作为合理偏狭的公共性-兼论现代治理的价值导向[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(5):125-131,191.
    [30] 齐格蒙特·鲍曼.个体化社会[M].范祥涛,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011:399.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

赵秋倩,夏显力,王进.逆城镇化、乡贤回归与乡村振兴——基于浙中X村的田野调查[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(1):54-64. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. zs.2021.07.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:714
  • 下载次数: 1254
  • HTML阅读次数: 1143
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-11
文章二维码