推动"一带一路"沿线国家贸易和投资自由化便利化研究——新冠疫情背景下的挑战与应对
作者:
中图分类号:

F125;F746

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大研究项目"推动'一带一路’贸易和投资自由化便利化研究"(18VDL013)


Research on China’s promotion of trade and investment liberalization and facilitation of countries along "the Belt and Road": The challenge and response under the Covid-19 pandemic
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    新冠疫情全球大流行带来生命威胁的同时,对全球贸易和投资造成的冲击和影响亦不容小觑。我国推动与"一带一路"沿线国家贸易和投资自由化便利化建设遭遇了外部环境收紧和疫情叠加的双重约束。作为"一带一路"倡议的主导者,如何审视新冠疫情冲击下与沿线国家的贸易和投资自由化便利化成为当前研究的重要内容。文章从新冠疫情全球大流行的现实背景出发,分析了推动"一带一路"沿线国家贸易和投资自由化便利化面临的新挑战,在立足于贸易和投资自由化便利化的基本判定之上进一步提出应对之策。研究认为,疫情直接冲击了全球供应链、价值链和产业链,全球经贸活动受限影响了"一带一路"贸易和投资自由化便利化的进度和节奏,但是相关基本判定不会因外部环境的变化而产生动摇。因此,推动"一带一路"沿线国家贸易和投资自由化便利化,在把握多元目标的逻辑自洽性和一致性基础上,还需要意识到实施过程的长期性、反复性、复杂性和多样性,以平常心对待主客观认识的变化和修正。基于上述重要判定,文章提出以下政策建议:第一,强化区域经济一体化的对接,在现有的规则和多边贸易协定基础上,融合和对接有助于"一带一路"贸易和投资自由化便利化的规则和措施。第二,在区域经济一体化"整体对接"情况下,充分利用"个体"合作的重要性和突破作用。可考虑通过双边自贸协定谈判,强化中国与自贸协定国的经贸关系,以"一带一路"倡议作为积极开拓双边市场的重要动力,利用示范性合作和收获性成果撬动区域的贸易和投资自由化便利化。第三,借助已有的价值链体系优势和制造业产能优势,从地区和产业维度对沿线国家制定差异化和有针对性的区域价值链布局策略。建议以"一带一路"倡议为契机强化以价值链构建为核心的贸易和投资平台,构造以中国制造为核心的价值链体系,打造"区域价值链合作范本"。第四,抓住疫情期间数字经济的快速发展机遇,挖掘疫情后信息网络、数字经济、跨境电子商务以及公共卫生领域的产业合作新空间。

    Abstract:

    While the global pandemic of the COVID-19 threatens lives, it also has an impact on the global trade and investment. China’s promotion of trade and investment liberalization and facilitation with countries along "the Belt and Road" has encountered the constraints of the tightening of the external environment and the superimposed impact of the pandemic. As the leader of "the Belt and Road", how to examine the promotion of trade and investment liberalization and facilitation under the impact of the COVID-19 has become a significant study. The paper analyzes the new challenges faced by the countries along "the Belt and Road" to promote trade and investment liberalization and facilitation under the epidemic and then proposes policy suggestions. The pandemic has directly impacted the global supply chain, value chain and industrial chain. The pandemic will affect the progress and pace of "the Belt and Road" trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, but the basic judgment remains the same. To promote trade and investment liberalization and facilitation of countries along "the Belt and Road", it is necessary to be aware of the logical consistency of multiple goals. It is also necessary to be aware of the long-term, complex and repetitive nature of the implementation process, and calmly to deal with changes in our subjective and objective perceptions. The paper puts forward the following policy suggestions: Firstly, on the basis of existing multilateral trade agreements, align the rules and measures that are conducive to the liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment under "the Belt and Road". Secondly, make full use of breakthrough role of individual cooperation. It is suggested to strengthen the economic and trade relations between China and FTA countries through bilateral free trade agreement negotiations. Taking the "the Belt and Road"as an important driving force for actively exploring bilateral markets, and using exemplary cooperation results to promote the liberalization and facilitation of regional trade and investment. Thirdly, with the advantages of the existing value chain system and manufacturing advantages, develop differentiated value chain strategies for countries along "the Belt and Road". It is suggested to take"the Belt and Road" as an opportunity to strengthen the trade and investment platform with value chain and create a regional value chain cooperation model. Finally, seize the opportunity for the rapid development of the digital economy during the epidemic, and promote industrial cooperation in the fields of information network, digital economy, cross-border e-commerce and public health between China and countries along "the Belt and Road".

    参考文献
    [1] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.World investment report 2020:International production beyond the pandemic[R].Geneva:UNCTAD,2020.
    [2] 张志敏,开鑫,李静.国际经济秩序的发展、困境与中国方案:兼论中美贸易摩擦和新冠肺炎疫情的影响[J].西部论坛,2020(5):70-81.
    [3] 周岩,陈淑梅.21世纪海上丝绸之路贸易自由化和便利化的经济效应分析[J].亚太经济,2016(1):50-56.
    [4] 吴新生,梁琦.贸易自由化与FDI区位选择:来自"一带一路"沿线国家的经验证据[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6):571-579,586.
    [5] 孔庆峰,董虹蔚."一带一路"国家的贸易便利化水平测算与贸易潜力研究[J].国际贸易问题,2015(12):158-168.
    [6] 刘宇,吕郢康,全水萍."一带一路"战略下贸易便利化的经济影响:以中哈贸易为例的GTAP模型研究[J].经济评论,2016(6):70-83.
    [7] 王微微,谭咏琳.贸易便利化水平对"一带一路"沿线国家双边贸易的影响分析[J].经济问题,2019(9):120-128.
    [8] 冯一帆,张青青."一带一路"六大经济走廊贸易便利化测评报告(2013—2018)[J].国家治理,2019(43):3-10.
    [9] 宋周莺,虞洋."一带一路"沿线贸易便利化发展格局研究[J].地理科学进展,2020(3):355-366.
    [10] 边婧,张曙霄.我国对外直接投资贸易效应的异质性研究:基于"一带一路"沿线国家的分析[J].经济纵横,2020(2):99-105.
    [11] 高越,张孜豪.制度质量对中国OFDI投资效率的影响:基于"一带一路"沿线国家数据的检验[J].经济体制改革,2020(5):135-142.
    [12] 约瑟夫·E.斯蒂格利茨[M].李杨,唐克,章添香,等译.全球化逆潮.北京:机械工业出版社,2019:43-58.
    [13] 张弛,郑永年.新冠疫情、全球化与国际秩序演变[J].当代世界,2020(7):17-21.
    [14] 钟飞腾.慢全球化:新冠疫情与中国的外部经济环境[J].教学与研究,2020(10):69-80.
    [15] 张蕴岭.高度重视全球化发展的新调整及影响[J].国际问题研究,2020(3):39-43.
    [16] 徐奇渊.双重冲击下的全球化:困境与出路[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2020(8):86-93.
    [17] 赵明昊.新冠肺炎疫情与美国对华战略竞争的深化[J].美国研究,2020(4):20-44,5-6.
    [18] 沈国兵.疫情全球蔓延下推动国内国际双循环促进经贸发展的困境及纾解举措[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021(1):1-13.
    [19] 黄仁伟."一带一路"面临新挑战和新机遇[N].环球时报,2020-05-26(015).
    [20] 刘宏松.新冠肺炎疫情下的全球化与全球治理的强化路径[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(5):78-86,99.
    [21] 张二震,戴翔.疫情冲击下全球价值链重构及中国对策[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2020(5):92-101.
    [22] 刘志彪,陈柳.疫情冲击对全球产业链的影响、重组与中国的应对策略[J].南京社会科学,2020(5):15-21.
    [23] 周文波.国际贸易与FDI关系的发展轨迹:替代、互补与融合[J].企业经济,2010(2):141-144.
    [24] 张幼文.贸易投资融合原理与全球化收益的国民属性[J].世界经济研究,2018(2):3-12,134.
    [25] 张晓静,李梁."一带一路"与中国出口贸易:基于贸易便利化视角[J].亚太经济,2015(3):21-27.
    [26] 郭泽林,陈琪.新冠肺炎疫情对全球经济治理的影响研究[J].经济体制改革,2020(6):29-35.
    [27] 陈继勇,刘燚爽."一带一路"沿线国家贸易便利化对中国贸易潜力的影响[J].世界经济研究,2018(9):41-54,135-136.
    [28] 吴兆丹,华钰,丁小琦."一带一路"国家贸易便利化对中国外贸的影响[J].华东经济管理,2020(3):53-58.
    [29] 张蕴岭,陆南泉,李向阳,等."一带一路"倡议与国际发展环境和国际合作[J].财经问题研究,2018(10):3-20.
    [30] 叶海林.中国推进"一带一路"倡议的认知风险及其防范[J].世界经济与政治,2019(10):122-142,160.
    [31] 彼得·卡赞斯坦.地区构成的世界:美国帝权中的亚洲和欧洲[M].秦亚青,魏玲,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:10-20.
    [32] 高程.中美竞争与"一带一路"阶段属性和目标[J].世界经济与政治,2019(4):58-78,156-157.
    [33] 董哲.服务贸易商业存在FTA规制研究:以贸易投资规则融合为视角[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2018(5):5-16,26.
    [34] 施展.从贸易摩擦到商人秩序:从中越制造业关系看"复合双循环"结构[J].探索与争鸣,2020(1):47-59,157-158.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王素云,沈桂龙.推动"一带一路"沿线国家贸易和投资自由化便利化研究——新冠疫情背景下的挑战与应对[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(2):26-37. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2021.07.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:526
  • 下载次数: 1447
  • HTML阅读次数: 3005
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-25
文章二维码