我国知识产权刑法的最新修正及其适用
作者:
中图分类号:

D924.3


Latest amendments and their application of intellectual property in criminal law in China
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在知识产权的重要性日益突显和加强知识产权保护的呼声不断加强的背景下,《刑法修正案(十一)》对我国知识产权刑法规范体系进行了大幅修改,不仅加强了知识产权刑法保护的规范供给,而且彰显了我国加强知识产权保护的决心。从具体内容来看,《刑法修正案(十一)》对知识产权刑法的修改,主要表现为通过增设新罪和拓展旧罪的方式扩大知识产权刑法的规制范围,通过调高法定刑的配置加重对侵犯知识产权犯罪的处罚。透过知识产权刑法规范可以发现,此次修法充分体现了全面保护知识产权、积极保护知识产权和法秩序相统一的最新立法理念,这些立法理念对知识产权刑法相关条文的理解与适用具有重要意义。《刑法修正案(十一)》已经正式施行,应当对侵犯著作权罪、侵犯商业秘密罪和为境外窃取、刺探、收买、非法提供商业秘密罪等罪名的构成要件要素进行系统解释,以便保护知识产权的立法目的能够在司法层面得以充分实现。

    Abstract:

    In the context of the increasing importance of intellectual property and the increasing calls for strengthening intellectual property protection, the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law substantially amended the normative system of intellectual property in criminal law, which not only strengthening the supply of norms of intellectual property criminal protection, but also demonstrating the determination to strengthen intellectual property protection. From the point of view of specific content, the amendments of intellectual property in criminal law by the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law are mainly manifested in expanding the regulation scope of intellectual property in criminal law by adding new crimes and expanding old crimes, in aggravating the penalty for crimes of infringement of intellectual property by increasing allocation of statutory penalty. Through the norms of intellectual property in criminal law, it can be found that this amendment fully reflects the latest legislative concepts of comprehensive protection of intellectual property, active protection of intellectual property, and the unity of the order of law, which are of great significance to the understanding and application of the relevant provisions of intellectual property in criminal law. The Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law has been officially implemented and it is necessary to systematically explain the constitutive elements of the crimes of infringing copyright, infringing trade secret and stealing, secretly gathering, purchasing, or illegally providing trade secret for overseas entities, in order to fully achieve the legislative purpose of protecting intellectual property at the judicial level.

    参考文献
    [1] 《求是》杂志编辑部.全面加强知识产权保护的科学指南[J].求是,2021(3):9-140.
    [2] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于强化知识产权保护的意见》[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-11/24/content_5455070.htm.
    [3] 胡云腾,徐文文.《刑法修正案(十一)》若干问题解读[J].法治研究,2021(2):55-65.
    [4] 时延安,陈冉,敖博.《刑法修正案(十一)》评注与案例[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021:239.
    [5] 李小武.服务商标保护的特殊性:兼评《非诚勿扰》商标侵权案[J].电子知识权,2017(10):29-37.
    [6] 孙谦.《刑法修正案(十一)》的理解与适用[J].人民检察,2021:(8):1-12.
    [7] 石经海,苏桑妮.刑法数额因素之"唯数额论"误区[J/OL].重庆大学学报(社会科学版):1-13[2021-06-30].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.c.20210121.1437.002.html.
    [8] 田宏杰.强化知识产权保护的又一里程碑[N].检察日报,2021-01-06(003).
    [9] 刘湘廉.我国当前知识产权保护的刑法应对研究[G]//李永升,朱建华.历史变革中的刑法新思维.北京:法律出版社,2015:646-655.
    [10] 中共中国科学院党组.保护知识产权就是保护创新[J].求是,2021(3):28-31.
    [11] 习近平.全面加强知识产权保护工作 激发创新活力推动构建新发展格局[J].求是,2021(3):4-8.
    [12] 周光权.转型时期刑法立法的思路与方法[J].中国社会科学,2016(3):123-146,207.
    [13] 周光权.刑事立法进展与司法展望:《刑法修正案(十一)》总置评[J].法学,2021(1):18-35.
    [14] 张永强.预防性犯罪化立法的正当性及其边界[J].当代法学,2020(4):104-115.
    [15] 周光权.积极刑法立法观在中国的确立[J].法学研究,2016(4):23-40.
    [16] 陈兴良.民法对刑法的影响与刑法对民法的回应[J].法商研究,2021(2):26-43.
    [17] 王昭武.法秩序统一性视野下违法判断的相对性[J].中外法学,2015(1):170-179.
    [18] 于改之.法域协调视角下规范保护目的理论之重构[J].中国法学,2021(2):207-227.
    [19] 张金平.信息网络传播权中"向公众提供"的内涵[J].清华法学,2018(2):125-143.
    [20] 时延安,陈冉,敖博.《刑法修正案(十一)》评注与案例[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021:243.
    [21] 马忠法,李仲琛.再论我国商业秘密保护的立法模式[J].电子知识产权,2019(12):4-13.
    [22] 沈玉忠.侵犯商业秘密罪中"重大损失"的司法判定:以60个案例为样本[J].知识产权,2016(1):63-68.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘湘廉.我国知识产权刑法的最新修正及其适用[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(2):232-245. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2021.07.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:465
  • 下载次数: 1183
  • HTML阅读次数: 1630
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-25
文章二维码