“一带一路”、OFDI与企业创新——基于沪深上市公司的实证分析
作者:
中图分类号:

F727;F832.51;F125;F273.1

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"推动长江经济带制造业高质量发展研究"(19BJL061)


“The Belt and Road” Initiatives, OFDI and enterprise innovation: Based on empirical analysis of listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    建设创新丝绸之路是推动共建"一带一路"高质量发展的重要抓手。在第四次工业革命的背景下,"一带一路"倡议为企业"走出去"和"引进来"提供广阔平台,对企业把握数字化、网络化、智能化发展机遇,探索新技术、新业态、新模式具有重要意义。文章从企业对外直接投资视角切入,以2007—2017年3 665家沪深上市公司作为研究样本,利用倾向得分匹配法、双重差分法、政策评估中介效应模型等研究方法,评估"一带一路"倡议对企业创新的影响,进一步揭示企业对外直接投资的中介效应。机理分析表明:"一带一路"倡议为中国企业对外直接投资提供了互联互通的交通基础设施、良好政策环境和有效金融支持体系,企业主要采用绿地投资和跨国并购,通过规模经济效应、压力式创新、逆向技术溢出效应、技术比较优势、生产协作网络等途径,提高企业自身的创新水平。实证分析结果表明:第一,"一带一路"倡议显著提升企业创新水平,其政策效应在"一带一路"倡议提出后持续增强;第二,政府补助、净利润和市值均对企业创新具有显著为正的作用,政府补助降低企业从事创新研发活动风险和研发投入成本,盈利能力强和市值高的企业普遍具有对抗技术创新风险的能力;第三,相较于小型企业和民营、外资企业,大中型企业和国有企业更能通过"一带一路"倡议提升创新水平;第四,企业对外直接投资在"一带一路"倡议促进企业创新中发挥显著为正的中介效应,而且大中型企业和国有企业对外直接投资的中介效应更强。此外,基于替换变量和平行趋势检验的稳健性检验结果证明了文章研究结论的可信性。最后,文章提出以下政策建议:第一,基于科创主体、创新投入、成果转化、政府管理等各个环节,积极发挥有为政府的政策引导作用,逐步建立科技金融创新、科技成果转化、人才引进等方面的长效机制;第二,加强创新要素流动与创新资源优化配置,促进与"一带一路"沿线国家实现技术研发合作和创新成果共享;第三,深化国际产能合作,推动产业迈向全球价值链中高端,实现产业转型升级。

    Abstract:

    Building the Innovative Silk Road is a crucial way to promote the high-quality development of "the Belt and Road" Initiative. In the context of the fourth industrial revolution, "the Belt and Road" Initiative provides a broad platform for enterprises to "go global" and "bring in". It is significant for enterprises to seize opportunities for digital, networked, and intelligent development and explore new technologies, new forms of business, and new models. This paper uses 3665 Shanghai and Shenzhen listed companies from 2007-2017 as the research sample and uses the propensity score matching method, difference in difference method, and policy evaluation mediating effect model. From the perspective of outward foreign direct investment, this paper evaluates the impact of "the Belt and Road" Initiative on the innovation of Chinese enterprises and further reveals the mediating effect of outward foreign direct investment. Mechanism analysis shows that "the Belt and Road" Initiative provides an interconnected transportation infrastructure, a good policy environment, and an adequate financial support system for Chinese enterprises' outward foreign direct investment. Enterprises mainly implement greenfield investment and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, and improve their innovation level through economies of scale, pressure innovation, reverse technology spillover effect, comparative technology advantage, and production cooperation network. The empirical analysis results are as follows. First, "the Belt and Road" Initiative has improved the innovation level of enterprises, and its policy effect is continuous. Second, government subsidies, net profit, and market value all significantly positively affect enterprise innovation. Government subsidies reduce the risks of innovation and R&D investment costs, and enterprises with strong profitability and high market value can generally resist technological innovation risks. Third, compared with small enterprises, private enterprises, and foreign-funded enterprises, large and medium-sized enterprises and state-owned enterprises are better able to improve innovation through "the Belt and Road" Initiative. Fourth, enterprises' outward foreign direct investment plays a significantly positive mediating effect in promoting innovation, and the mediating effect of large and medium-sized enterprises and state-owned enterprises' outward foreign direct investment is more substantial. In addition, the results of robustness tests based on substitution variables and parallel trend test prove the credibility of the conclusions of this paper. Finally, this paper puts forward the following policy suggestions. First, from the aspects of technological innovation subject, innovation investment, transformation of technological achievements, and government management, the government should play a guiding role and gradually establish a long-term mechanism for technological finance, transformation of technological achievement and talent introduction. Second, we should strengthen the flow of innovation elements and the optimal allocation of innovation resources, and promote technological cooperation and sharing of innovation achievements with countries along "the Belt and Road". Third, we should deepen international production capacity cooperation and promote the industry to move towards the middle and high end of the global value chain, to realize industrial transformation and upgrading.

    参考文献
    [1] 方旖旎."一带一路"战略下中国企业对海外直接投资国的风险评估[J].现代经济探讨, 2016(1):79-83.
    [2] 张军成, 李威浩."一带一路"背景下新时代科技创新理论及实践路径探究[J].科技进步与对策, 2020(8):27-33.
    [3] 舒杏, 王佳, 胡锡琴.中国企业对"一带一路"国家出口频率研究:基于Nbreg计数模型[J].国际贸易问题, 2016(5):82-93.
    [4] 刘淑春, 林汉川.标准化对中国装备制造"走出去"的影响:基于中国与"一带一路"沿线国家的双边贸易实证[J].国际贸易问题, 2017(11):60-69.
    [5] 谢水园.中国企业走出去的"一带一路"战略布局:基于企业投资意愿的视角[J].沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(4):319-325.
    [6] 辜胜阻, 吴沁沁, 庄芹芹.推动"一带一路"建设与企业"走出去"的对策思考[J].经济纵横, 2017(2):1-9.
    [7] 姜江, 胡振华.区域产业集群创新系统发展路径与机制研究[J].经济地理, 2013(8):86-90, 115.
    [8] BÉNABOU R, TICCHI D, VINDIGNI A.Religion and innovation[J].American Economic Review, 2015, 105(5):346-351.
    [9] LEMLEY M A, FELDMAN R.Patent licensing, technology transfer, and innovation[J].American Economic Review, 2016, 106(5):188-192.
    [10] 李爽.专利制度是否提高了中国工业企业的技术创新积极性:基于专利保护强度和地区经济发展水平的"门槛效应"[J].财贸研究, 2017(4):13-24, 42.
    [11] RANASINGHE A.Innovation, firm size and the Canada-U.S. productivity gap[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2017, 85:46-58.
    [12] VANYUSHYN V, BENGTSSON M, NÄSHOLM M H, et al.International coopetition for innovation:Are the benefits worth the challenges?[J].Review of Managerial Science, 2018, 12(2):535-557.
    [13] KHACHOO Q, SHARMA R.FDI and innovation:an investigation into intra-and inter-industry effects[J].Global Economic Review, 2016, 45(4):311-330.
    [14] 石大千, 杨咏文.FDI与企业创新:溢出还是挤出?[J].世界经济研究, 2018(9):120-134, 137.
    [15] PIPEROPOULOS P, WU J, WANG C Q.Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises[J].Research Policy, 2018, 47(1):232-240.
    [16] 郝新东, 杨俊凯.东道国科技创新、制度质量与中国OFDI门槛效应分析:基于"一带一路"视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2020(6):77-83.
    [17] 李沁筑, 董有德."一带一路"区域经济开放与企业创新的耦合分析[J].统计与决策, 2018(12):107-110.
    [18] 孙吉乐."一带一路"倡议提升沿线省市区域创新效率的作用机理及实证检验[D].兰州:兰州大学, 2018.
    [19] 王雄元, 卜落凡.国际出口贸易与企业创新:基于"中欧班列"开通的准自然实验研究[J].中国工业经济, 2019(10):80-98.
    [20] 李秋梅, 林灵, 曾海舰."一带一路"倡议是否有利于促进企业创新能力提升[J].科技进步与对策, 2019(17):47-56.
    [21] 王桂军, 卢潇潇."一带一路"倡议与中国企业升级[J].中国工业经济, 2019(3):43-61.
    [22] 刘思玥."一带一路"、金融发展与企业创新[D].重庆:重庆理工大学, 2019.
    [23] 曹平, 王智林."一带一路"倡议、产业集聚与中国企业创新[J].技术经济, 2020(6):10-16, 23.
    [24] 董博."一带一路"倡议能否促进企业创新:基于企业国际化的中介检验[D].昆明:云南财经大学, 2020.
    [25] 赵维, 邓富华, 霍伟东."一带一路"沿线国家互联网基础设施的贸易效应:基于贸易成本和全要素生产率的中介效应分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(3):19-33.
    [26] 王桂军, 张辉."一带一路"与中国OFDI企业TFP:对发达国家投资视角[J].世界经济, 2020(5):49-72.
    [27] 王桂军, 卢潇潇."一带一路"倡议可以促进中国企业创新吗?[J].财经研究, 2019(1):19-34.
    [28] 刘夏明, 王珏, 逯建.中国OFDI的研究综述:理论创新与重构[J].中南财经政法大学学报, 2016(2):86-95, 160.
    [29] IMAI K, KEELE L, TINGLEY D.A general approach to causal mediation analysis[J].Psychological Methods, 2010, 15(4):309-334.
    [30] 黎文靖, 郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究, 2016(4):60-73.
    [31] 毛其淋, 许家云.中国企业对外直接投资是否促进了企业创新[J].世界经济, 2014(8):98-125.
    [32] 李文贵, 余明桂.民营化企业的股权结构与企业创新[J].管理世界, 2015(4):112-125.
    [33] 杨祎, 杨水利, 叶建华, 等.制造业OFDI、技术差距与增加值出口[J].经济经纬, 2020(2):69-76
    [34] 任芳容, 田泽, 施滢滢.中国对"一带一路"欧亚非国家OFDI效率与空间效应研究[J].经济纵横, 2021(5):117-128.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

尹礼汇,赵伟,吴传清.“一带一路”、OFDI与企业创新——基于沪深上市公司的实证分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(5):1-13. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2021.09.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:461
  • 下载次数: 768
  • HTML阅读次数: 1474
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-11-07
文章二维码