环境法治与环境污染水平——长江经济带108个城市的例证分析
作者:
中图分类号:

F062.2;X196;X321;D922.68

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"长三角环境治理政策组合绩效评估与优化研究"(21BJL127)


Environmental rule of law and environmental pollution levels: Examples from 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [39]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    我国自1973年颁布《关于保护和完善环境的若干规定(试行草案)》以来,中央与地方政府出台了大量环境治理方面的法律法规,业已成为推进我国环境污染治理的重要举措,那么,环保法治能降低环境污染水平吗?文章探究了环境法治对环境污染的影响,并分析了地方环境立法影响环境污染的作用机制,在此基础上,以长江经济带108个城市为样本,选取2003—2017年市级面板数据,采用双重差分法实证检验环境法治对环境污染的影响,并检验了产业升级是环境立法影响环境污染的传导机制,同时通过倾向得分匹配法、分区域层面的实证检验、动态效应检验验证了文章的研究假设,并提出相关政策建议。研究结果表明:地方环境立法显著抑制了环境污染,且通过滞后效应的检验结果也表明地方环境立法对环境污染的抑制作用,意味着地方环境立法的减排效果具有长效机制;对长江经济带上中下游分区域的检验结果也验证了环境立法抑制环境污染的结论,与长江经济带全样本检验结果一致,表明地方环境立法抑制环境污染的效果较为稳健,且通过倾向得分匹配法重新对研究样本进行匹配得到的检验结果也支持了地方环境立法的治污效果;进一步的传导机制研究发现,环境立法通过产业升级抑制了环境污染水平,即产业升级是地方环境立法影响环境污染的传导机制,意味着通过地方环境立法激励企业创新,进而促进产业升级,对环境污染产生了抑制作用。因此,文章最后从全面推动环境治理的法治化进程、健全地方环境立法体系建设、扩大环保领域转移支付力度、保证治理污染资金充足、增加环境保护考核标准、防止出现"运动式"治理模式等方面提出了相应的环境治理政策建议。文章从市级层面视角分析了环境立法对环境污染的机理,并通过实证进行了一系列检验,通过传导机制检验验证了环境立法对环境污染的影响,丰富了市级层面环境污染的治理效应研究,有利于为地方政府治理环境污染提供有益借鉴。

    Abstract:

    Since the promulgation of "Several Provisions on Protecting and Improving the Environment (Trial Draft)" in 1973, the central and local governments have issued a large number of laws and regulations on environmental governance, which has become an important measure to promote environmental pollution control in China. Then, can the rule of environmental protection reduce the level of environmental pollution? This paper explores the impact of environmental rule by law on environmental pollution, and analyzes the mechanism of local environmental legislation on environmental pollution. On this basis, 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt are selected as samples and the municipal panel data from 2003 to 2017 are selected to empirically test the impact of environmental rule by dual difference method. The paper also verifies that industrial upgrading is the transmission mechanism of environmental legislation affecting environmental pollution, and verifies the research results of this paper by means of propensity score matching method, empirical test at sub-regional level and dynamic effect test, and puts forward relevant policy suggestions. The results show that:1) Local environmental legislation significantly inhibits environmental pollution, and the lag effect test results also show that local environmental legislation inhibits environmental pollution, which means that the emission reduction effect of local environmental legislation has a long-term mechanism; 2) The test results of the sub-regions along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt also verify the conclusion that environmental legislation inhibits environmental pollution, which is consistent with the results of the full-sample test of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, indicating that the effect of local environmental legislation on inhibiting environmental pollution is relatively robust. The results obtained by the propensity score matching method also support the pollution control effect of local environmental legislation; 3) Further research on the transmission mechanism shows that environmental legislation inhibits environmental pollution through industrial upgrading, that is, industrial upgrading is the transmission mechanism of local environmental legislation affecting environmental pollution, which means that local environmental legislation stimulates enterprise innovation, promotes industrial upgrading, and inhibits environmental pollution. Therefore, the article finally puts forward the corresponding environmental policy recommendations such as from the overall to the proceeding of the rule of law to promote environmental governance, perfecting the system of local environmental legislation construction, expanding the transfer payment in field of environmental protection efforts, ensuring pollution control well-funded, increasing the environmental protection inspection standard, preventing "sports type" management mode. This paper analyzes the mechanism of environmental legislation on the environmental pollution from the perspective of the municipal level, empirically conducts a series of tests, and verifies the effect of environmental legislation on environmental pollution through the transmission mechanism, enriches the research on the environmental pollution control effect of the municipal level, and provides beneficial reference on environment pollution governance for local government.

    参考文献
    [1] 贺璇, 王冰."运动式"治污:中国的环境威权主义及其效果检视[J].人文杂志, 2016(10):121-128.
    [2] 盛斌, 吕越.外国直接投资对中国环境的影响:来自工业行业面板数据的实证研究[J].中国社会科学, 2012(5):54-75, 205.
    [3] 李强.正式与非正式环境规制的减排效应研究:以长江经济带为例[J].现代经济探讨, 2018(5):92-99.
    [4] 包群, 吕越, 陈媛媛.外商投资与我国环境污染:基于工业行业面板数据的经验研究[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010(3):93-103.
    [5] WILSON J D.Theories of tax competition[J].National Tax Journal, 1999, 52(2):269-304.
    [6] AZOMAHOU T, LAISNEY F, NGUYEN VAN P.Economic development and CO2 emissions:A nonparametric panel approach[J].Journal of Public Economics, 2006, 90(6/7):1347-1363.
    [7] 关海玲, 张鹏.财政支出、公共产品供给与环境污染[J].工业技术经济, 2013(10):46-54.
    [8] 吴建祖, 王蓉娟.环保约谈提高地方政府环境治理效率了吗:基于双重差分方法的实证分析[J].公共管理学报, 2019(1):54-65, 171.
    [9] MAGAT W A, VISCUSI W K.Effectiveness of the EPA's regulatory enforcement:The case of industrial effluent standards[J].The Journal of Law and Economics, 1990, 33(2):331-360.
    [10] ARIMURA T H, SUGINO M.Does stringent environmental regulation stimulate environment related technological innovation?[J] Sophia Economic Review, 2007, 52:1-14.
    [11] HAMAMOTO M.Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries[J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2006, 28(4):299-312.
    [12] FEICHTINGER G, HARTL R F, KORT P M, et al.Environmental policy, the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital:Effects of learning and technological progress[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005, 50(2):434-446.
    [13] 徐志伟.工业经济发展、环境规制强度与污染减排效果:基于"先污染, 后治理"发展模式的理论分析与实证检验[J].财经研究, 2016(3):134-144.
    [14] 张同斌.提高环境规制强度能否"利当前"并"惠长远"[J].财贸经济, 2017(3):116-130.
    [15] 任小静, 屈小娥, 张蕾蕾.环境规制对环境污染空间演变的影响[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(1):1-8.
    [16] 张泽义, 徐宝亮.规制强度、影子经济与污染排放[J].经济与管理研究, 2017(11):100-111.
    [17] 郑思齐, 万广华, 孙伟增, 等.公众诉求与城市环境治理[J].管理世界, 2013(6):72-84.
    [18] FARZIN Y H, BOND C A.Democracy and environmental quality[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2006, 81(1):213-235.
    [19] 李子豪.公众参与对地方政府环境治理的影响:2003-2013年省际数据的实证分析[J].中国行政管理, 2017(8):102-108.
    [20] 曾倩, 曾先峰, 刘津汝.产业结构视角下环境规制工具对环境质量的影响[J].经济经纬, 2018(6):94-100.
    [21] 孙早, 屈文波.中国环境立法管制的生产率增长效应研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2016(11):1-6.
    [22] 杨烨, 谢建国.进口竞争冲击对中国企业绩效的影响:基于环境立法管制的缓解效应视角[J].经济与管理研究, 2020(11):108-129.
    [23] 何砚, 陆文香.环境管制如何影响了中国企业的出口行为:基于企业融资异质性视角[J].财贸研究, 2019(12):30-47.
    [24] 盛丹, 李蕾蕾.地区环境立法是否会促进企业出口[J].世界经济, 2018(11):145-168.
    [25] 袁浩铭, 张夏羿, 孙永强.环境法治、财政分权与环保投资效率[J].财经问题研究, 2018(3):87-94.
    [26] 范子英, 赵仁杰. 法治强化能够促进污染治理吗:来自环保法庭设立的证据[J].经济研究, 2019(3):21-37.
    [27] 包群, 邵敏, 杨大利.环境管制抑制了污染排放吗?[J].经济研究, 2013(12):42-54.
    [28] 杨仁发, 李娜娜.环境规制与中国工业绿色发展:理论分析与经验证据[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(5):79-91.
    [29] 张克中, 王娟, 崔小勇.财政分权与环境污染:碳排放的视角[J].中国工业经济, 2011(10):65-75.
    [30] 徐以祥, 刘海波.生态文明与我国环境法律责任立法的完善[J].法学杂志, 2014(7):30-37.
    [31] 张平淡, 袁浩铭, 杜雯翠.环境法治、环保投资与治污减排[J].山西财经大学学报, 2019(4):17-30.
    [32] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究, 2011(5):4-16, 31.
    [33] 万丽娟, 刘敏, 尹希果.财政分权、经济集聚与环境污染:基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5):43-53.
    [34] 黄金升, 张耀宇.经济发展水平差异、产业用地比价与环境污染[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5):91-105.
    [35] 李强.产业升级与生态环境优化耦合度评价及影响因素研究:来自长江经济带108个城市的例证[J].现代经济探讨, 2017(10):71-78.
    [36] 刘俸奇, 张同斌.财政收支结构变动、产业结构转型与环境质量改善[J].财政研究, 2020(10):57-73.
    [37] 郑新业, 张阳阳, 马本, 等.全球化与收入不平等:新机制与新证据[J].经济研究, 2018(8):132-146.
    [38] 李佳佳.制度安排、城镇化与环境污染[J].经济经纬, 2020(3):29-36.
    [39] 李蕾蕾, 盛丹.地方环境立法与中国制造业的行业资源配置效率优化[J].中国工业经济, 2018(7):136-154.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李强,刘庆发.环境法治与环境污染水平——长江经济带108个城市的例证分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(5):32-45. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2022.03.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:263
  • 下载次数: 751
  • HTML阅读次数: 1066
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-11-07
文章二维码