数字经济的地方法治试验:理论阐释与实践路径
作者:
中图分类号:

D927;F49;D921

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"开放经济条件下我国虚拟经济安全运行法律保障研究"(14ZDB148);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"数字经济的地方法治试验及其限度研究(2021CDSKXYFX009)


The experiment of rule of law at the local level in digital economy: Theoretical explanation and practical path
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [45]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    数字经济的异军突起,给作为治理体系和治理能力重要依托的法治秩序带来了挑战,也产生了全新的法治需求。面对新出现的"治理赤字",如何提供优质的"法治产品",构建有助于数字经济发展与治理的法治秩序,成为当务之急。但数字经济作为一种新生事物,高度依赖科技创新,处于不断创新、发展与变化之中,具有创新性、跨界性、虚拟性以及平台性等典型特征,由中央层面进行统一的法治供给面临诸多现实困难,也无法有效激活地方数字经济创新与发展的动力。为此,中央通过《国家数字经济创新发展试验区实施方案》,选择在部分地方进行数字经济创新发展与治理的试验,鼓励试验区加强体制机制创新和地方性法规探索。此背景下,数字经济领域的法治建设,除了由中央统一推动诸如《个人信息保护法》《数据安全法》等基础性法律制度的供给外,地方政府以法治试验的方式接入部分法治供给在理论层面何以可能,在实践层面是否具有现实基础、面临那些挑战以及如何克服,便成为不得不重视的问题。基于此,文章借助逻辑推理和实证分析方法,对数字经济领域地方法治试验的理论基础和实践路径进行了探索。研究发现,数字经济的地方法治试验,是一种有效回应数字经济法治需求的经验性治理方式。其理论逻辑在于以国家整体法治为最终归宿,以地方数字法治探索为切入口,在注重地方试错和经验积累的同时,将"自上而下"和"自下而上"的有机结合作为数字经济法治建设的路径选择,从中央和地方在数字经济发展与治理中各自所代表的利益及其所遭遇的现实困境出发,构建符合中国特色治理需求的数字法治格局。而宪法及其相关法律授予的地方法治创设权,中央对地方数字经济创新发展试验的授权与激励,以及部分省份"先行先试"的数字法治建设经验积累为该领域更大范围、更深层次的地方法治试验提供了现实可能。当然,数字经济的这种经验性法治路径也面临地方数字法治边界扩张、地方数据保护主义、地方数字治理方式单一等的挑战,需要以国家法制统一原则、全国统一市场目标,以及多元共治格局的构建等为限度,以此克服数字经济地方法治试验中的弊病,发挥其优势。

    Abstract:

    The sudden emergence of digital economy has brought challenges to the order of rule of law, which is an important support for the governance system and governance capacity, and also created a brand-new demand for the rule of law. Facing the new "governance deficit", how to provide high-quality "legal products" and build a legal order that is conducive to the development and governance of digital economy has become a top priority. However, digital economy, as a newly emerging thing, is highly dependent on scientific and technological innovation, and is in the process of continuous innovation, development and change, with typical characteristics such as being innovative, border-crossing, virtual and platform-based. The unified rule of law supply from the central level faces many practical difficulties, and it cannot effectively activate the driving force for innovation and development of local digital economy. To this end, the central government adopted the Implementation Plan of the National Digital Economy Innovation and Development Experimental Zone, selected some places to carry out pilot projects on digital economy innovation, development and governance, and encouraged the pilot zones to strengthen institutional innovation and explore local laws and regulations. Against this background, the development of the rule of law in the digital economy, in addition to the central government’s unified promotion of the supply of basic legal systems such as the Personal Information Protection Law and the Data Security Law, has become an issue that has to be paid attention to, such as how it is possible for local governments to access part of the rule of law supply in theory, whether it has a realistic foundation in practice, what challenges it faces and how to overcome them. Based on this, this paper explores the theoretical basis and practical path of the experiment of rule of law in the field of digital economy by means of logical reasoning and empirical analysis. Research finds that the experiment of rule of law at the local level in digital economy is an empirical governance method that effectively responds to the demand of rule of law in digital economy. The theoretical logic lies in taking the whole country’s rule of law as the ultimate destination, taking the exploration of local digital rule of law as the method, paying attention to local trial and error and experience accumulation, taking the organic combination of "top-down" and "bottom-up" as the path choice for the construction of digital economy rule of law, and starting from the interests represented by the central and local governments in the development and governance of digital economy and the realistic difficulties encountered, to construct the rule of law pattern meeting the governance needs with Chinese characteristics. However, the right to create local rule of law granted by the Constitution and its related laws, the authorization and encouragement of the central government to the pilots and trials in innovation-driven development of local digital economy, and the accumulation of digital rule of law development experience of the "pilot projects" in some provinces provide a realistic possibility for a wider and deeper local law-based pilot in this field. Of course, this empirical rule of law path of digital economy also faces challenges such as the expansion of local digital rule of law boundary, local data protectionism, and single local digital governance mode. It needs to be limited by the principle of national legal unity, the goal of national unified market, and the construction of pluralistic co-governance pattern, so as to overcome the disadvantages in the rule of law experiment at the local level of digital economy and give full play to its advantages.

    参考文献
    [1] 张守文.数字经济与经济法的理论拓展[J].地方立法研究,2021(1):19-31.
    [2] 徐晨,吴大华,唐兴伦.数字经济:新经济 新治理 新发展[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2017:21.
    [3] 张文显.构建智能社会的法律秩序[J].东方法学,2020(5):4-19.
    [4] 郑智航.超大型国家治理中的地方法治试验及其制度约束[J].法学评论,2020(1):39-50.
    [5] 周尚君.国家建设视角下的地方法治试验[J].法商研究,2013(1):3-11.
    [6] 葛洪义."地方法制"的概念及其方法论意义[J].法学评论,2018(3):22-30
    [7] 黄文艺.认真对待地方法治[J].法学研究,2012(6):19-23.
    [8] 周尚君.地方法治试验的动力机制与制度前景[J].中国法学,2014(2):50-64.
    [9] 付子堂,张善根.地方法治实践的动力机制及其反思[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016(4):107-117.
    [10] 郑智航.法治中国建设的地方试验:一个中央与地方关系的视角[J].法制与社会发展,2018(5):75-92.
    [11] 章志远.法治一体建设地方试验型模式研究[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2021(2):88-97.
    [12] 郑智航.当下中国地方法治试验的理想类型与实践反思[J].国家检察官学院学报,2021(1):113-127.
    [13] 丁轶.地方法治扩散的原理与限度[J].法学家,2021(1):15-29,191.
    [14] 柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学[M].韩朝华,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:267.
    [15] 苟学珍.地方法治竞争:营商环境法治化的地方经验[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2020(4):114-123,128.
    [16] 刘双舟.法律市场视野中的制度竞争与立法行为选择[J].政法论坛,2010(3):87-96.
    [17] BRETON A.Competitive governments:An economic theory of politics and public finance[M].Cambridge,New York:Cambridge University Press,1998:34-38.
    [18] 孙亚忠.政府竞争论[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2011:16.
    [19] 道格拉斯·诺思,罗伯特·托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].厉以宁,蔡磊,译.北京:华夏出版社,1989:6.
    [20] 前瞻产业研究院.2020年中国数字经济发展报告[EB/OL].(2020-08-21)[2021-12-10]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_8836276.
    [21] 张鹏.数字经济的本质及其发展逻辑[J].经济学家,2019(2):25-33.
    [22] 卡斯·桑斯坦.简化:政府的未来[M].陈丽芳,译.北京:中信出版社,2015:176.
    [23] 苏力.当代中国的中央与地方分权:重读毛泽东《论十大关系》第五节[J].中国社会科学,2004(2):42-55,205.
    [24] 赵立斌,张莉莉.数字经济概论[M].北京:科学出版社,2020:26-36.
    [25] 孙笑侠.拆迁风云中寻找法治动力:论转型期法治建构的主体[J].东方法学,2010(4):3-13.
    [26] 裴长洪,倪江飞,李越.数字经济的政治经济学分析[J].财贸经济,2018(9):5-22.
    [27] 施塔姆勒.现代法学之根本趋势[M].姚远,译.北京:商务印书馆,2016:53.
    [28] 克利福德·吉尔兹.地方性知识:事实与法律的比较透视[M]//邓正来,译.梁治平.法律的文化解释.上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1994:126.
    [29] 张文显.在新的历史起点上推进中国特色法学体系构建[J].中国社会科学,2019(10):23-42,204-205.
    [30] 胡光志,苟学珍.论地方政府参与金融风险治理的法治困境及出路[J].现代经济探讨,2020(10):112-119.
    [31] 刘怿,张梁.数字经济兴起下经济法的变与不变[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2021(4):130-139.
    [32] 程金华.地方法制/法治的自主性[J].中国法律评论,2019(3):42-51.
    [33] 丁轶.承包型法治:理解"地方法治"的新视角[J].法学家,2018(01):18-32,192.
    [34] 中共中央文献编辑委员会.邓小平文选(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:147.
    [35] 方益权,项一丛.从温州模式到温州法治模式:温州模式与区域法治文明论纲[J].探索与争鸣,2010(12):48-51.
    [36] 刘莘,覃慧.论我国"法制统一"的保障体系:兼评修正后《立法法》的有关规定[J].江苏社会科学,2015(4):161-169.
    [37] HERRMANN-PILLATH C.政府竞争:大国体制转型的理论分析范式[J].广东商学院学报,2009(3):4-21.
    [38] 刘志彪.建设国内统一大市场的重要意义与实现路径[J].人民论坛,2021(2):20-23.
    [39] 何玉长,王伟.数据要素市场化的理论阐释[J].当代经济研究,2021(4):33-44.
    [40] 陈兵,赵秉元.数据要素市场高质量发展的竞争法治推进[J].上海财经大学学报,2021(2):3-16.
    [41] 沈德咏,曹士兵,施新州.国家治理视野下的中国司法权构建[J].中国社会科学,2015(3):39-57.
    [42] 杜庆昊.数字经济协同治理机制探究[J].理论探索,2019(5):114-120.
    [43] 江必新.关于多元共治的若干思考[J].社会治理,2019(3):5-15.
    [44] 贺建风.新形势下数字经济的发展与治理[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2020(17):40-47.
    [45] 陈兵.法治视阈下数字经济发展与规制系统创新[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2019(4):100-115.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

胡光志,苟学珍.数字经济的地方法治试验:理论阐释与实践路径[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(6):218-230. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2022.09.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:202
  • 下载次数: 776
  • HTML阅读次数: 669
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-03
文章二维码