中心城市首位度对区域经济协调发展的影响研究——基于中国19个城市群的分析
作者:
中图分类号:

F061.5

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"新时代我国西部中心城市和城市群高质量协调发展战略研究"(20&ZD157)


A study on the influence of the first degree of central cities on the coordinated development of regional economy: Analysis based on nineteen large urban agglomerations in China
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [29]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在2019年8月的中央财经委第五次会议上强调中心城市和城市群正在成为承载发展要素的主要空间形式,新形势下要促进区域协调发展,在发展中营造平衡。目前各地区以经济发展为核心目标所展开的城市首位度提升、强化中心城市作用的区域经济发展导向,究竟是会导致城中心城市形成对周边地区的虹吸效应,劣化区域的协调发展,还是会形成更强的龙头带动作用,扩大其辐射扩散范围,缩小地区内部的发展差距?研究针对性分析我国现阶段重要的空间形态——城市群,其中心城市首位度变化对区域整体经济增长及协调发展的影响。在理论层面,研究基于区域非均衡发展理论、城市最优规模倒U型模型对中心城市的集聚与扩散效应与区域协调发展的作用机制展开分析,构建形成中心城市首位度对区域经济协调发展的理论框架,分别从中心城市在集聚效应下对区域协调发展的抑制作用、中心城市在扩散效应下对区域协调发展的推进作用、中心城市不同首位度水平作用机制三个方面对中心城市首位度与区域经济发展不同阶段的变化及其内部作用机理展开分析。在实证层面,研究以中国十九大城市群为研究对象,利用2006—2017年中国十九大城市群面板数据展开固定效应分析,并通过内生性检验对模型内生性问题进行控制处理。为进一步探寻中心城市首位度对区域经济协调发展的非线性作用,研究进一步通过对政府战略规划引导及区域制度政策的交互效应模型、中心城市首位度分布识别以分析中心城市首位度对区域经济协调发展的影响以及政府战略规划、区域制度所产生的影响。研究发现:第一,中心城市首位度对经济增长起到倒U型的作用。第二,中心城市首位度对区域经济的协调发展呈现出正U型的作用。第三,国家中心城市政策的出现会进一步促使中心城市的虹吸效应,虽然行政分割并未影响到城市群整体的经济增长,但会导致城市群内部不同省域间城市的发展差距扩大。第四,我国沿海地区及中西部地区成熟的城市群应当积极提升中心城市首位度,中西部地区尚在培育、不成熟的城市群应当着力副中心城市、中小城市的建设发展,推动地区形成梯度化的城市群结构体系。

    Abstract:

    At the fifth meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Committee of the Communist Party of China in August 2019, it is emphasized that central cities and urban agglomerations are becoming the main spatial forms that carry development elements. Under the new situation, it is necessary to promote coordinated regional development and create a balance in development. At present, the regional economic development orientation of increasing the primacy of cities and strengthening the role of central cities in various regions of China with economic development as the core goal will lead to the formation of the siphon effect of the central city on the surrounding areas, deteriorating the coordinated development of the region, or will it form a stronger leading role, expand its radiation diffusion range, and narrow the development gap within the region? The research aims to analyze the important spatial form of China at this stage, the urban agglomeration, and the impact of the change of the central city’s primacy on the overall economic growth and coordinated development of the region. At the theoretical level, the study analyzes the agglomeration and diffusion effects of central cities and the mechanism of coordinated regional development based on the theory of regional non-equilibrium development and the inverted U-shaped model of optimal urban scale, and constructs a mechanism for the formation of the central city’s primacy on the coordinated development of regional economy. The theoretical framework includes three aspects: the inhibitory effect of the central city on the coordinated development of the region under the agglomeration effect, the promotion effect of the central city on the coordinated development of the region under the diffusion effect, and the mechanism of the different primacy levels of the central city. The changes in different stages of regional economic development and their internal mechanism are analyzed. At the empirical level, the study takes the nineteen major urban agglomerations in China as the research object, uses the panel data of the nineteen major urban agglomerations in China from 2006 to 2017 to carry out fixed effects analysis, and controls the endogeneity problem of the model through the endogeneity test. In order to further explore the nonlinear effect of the central city primacy on the coordinated development of the regional economy, the study further analyzes the effect of the central city primacy on the regional economic coordination through the interaction model of the government’s strategic planning guidance and regional institutional policies, and the identification of the central city primacy distribution. The impact of development and the impact of government strategic planning, regional institutions. The study found that: First, the primacy of central cities has an inverted U-shaped effect on economic growth. Second, the primacy of the central city has a positive U-shaped effect on the coordinated development of the regional economy. Third, the emergence of the national central city policy will further promote the siphon effect of central cities. Although the administrative division does not affect the overall economic growth of the urban agglomeration, it will lead to the widening of the development gap between different provinces within the urban agglomeration. Fourth, urban agglomerations that are still being cultivated and immature in the central and western regions of China should focus on the construction and development of sub-center cities and small and medium-sized cities, and promote the formation of a gradient urban agglomeration structure system in the region.

    参考文献
    [1] 沈迟.走出"首位度"的误区[J].城市规划,1999(2):3-5.
    [2] 蔡之兵,满舰远.中国超大城市带动区域经济增长的效应研究[J].上海经济研究,2016(11):3-11,128.
    [3] 孙伟,金晓斌,张志宏,等.中国主要城市群新增制造业用地特征及城镇体系耦合分析[J].地理科学进展,2016(12):1483-1493.
    [4] WILLIAMSON J G.Regional inequality and the process of national development:A description of the patterns[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1965,13(4,Part 2):1-84.
    [5] BRVLHART M,SBERGAMI F.Agglomeration and growth:Cross-country evidence[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2009,65(1):48-63.
    [6] HARMS E.Megalopolitanmegalomania:Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam’s Southeastern region and the speculative growth machine[J].International Planning Studies,2019,24(1):53-67.
    [7] HENDERSON V.The urbanization process and economic growth:The so-what question[J].Jouranl of Economic Growth,2003,8(1):47-71.
    [8] ERMIAS A,BOGAERT J,WOGAYEHU F.Analysis of city size distribution in Ethiopia:Empirical evidence from 1984 to 2012[J].Journal of Urban Management,2019,8(2):237-244.
    [9] 徐长生,周志鹏.城市首位度与经济增长[J].财经科学,2014(9):59-68.
    [10] 李宝礼,胡雪萍.区域经济增长与最优城市首位度的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2018(7):155-160.
    [11] 田超.首位城市过大是否阻碍省域经济协调发展:基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(10):87-94.
    [12] 王家庭.城市首位度与区域经济增长:基于24个省区面板数据的实证研究[J].经济问题探索,2012(5):35-40.
    [13] 陈文喆.城市首位度最优规模的实证检验[J].统计与决策,2017(5):126-129.
    [14] ZIPF G K.Human behavior and the principle of least effort[M].Cambridge:Addison-Wselsy,1949.
    [15] KRUGMAN P.Increasing returns and economic geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(3):483-499.
    [16] KALDOR N.The case for regional policies[J].Scottish Journal of Political Economy,1970,17(3):337-348.
    [17] ALONSO W.The economics of urban size[J].Papers in Regional Science,2005,26(1):67-83.
    [18] 曾鹏,李洪涛.城市空间生产关系的集聚—扩散效应:时空修复与空间正义[J].社会科学,2018(5):32-41.
    [19] CAPELLO R,CAMAGNI R.Beyond optimal citysize:An evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns[J].Urban Studies,2000,37(9):1479-1496.
    [20] 梁婧,张庆华,龚六堂.城市规模与劳动生产率:中国城市规模是否过小:基于中国城市数据的研究[J].经济学(季刊),2015(3):1053-1072.
    [21] 王垚,年猛,王春华.产业结构、最优规模与中国城市化路径选择[J].经济学(季刊),2017(2):441-462.
    [22] GLAESER E L,KALLAL H D,SCHEINKMAN J A,et al.Growth in cities[J].Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(6):1126-1152.
    [23] 方创琳.中国城市发展方针的演变调整与城市规模新格局[J].地理研究,2014(4):674-686.
    [24] 柯善咨,赵曜.产业结构、城市规模与中国城市生产率[J].经济研究,2014(4):76-88,115.
    [25] 曾鹏,庞基展.中国十大城市群中心城市经济扩散力比较研究[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2):122-131.
    [26] 陆铭.城市、区域和国家发展:空间政治经济学的现在与未来[J].经济学(季刊),2017(4):1499-1532.
    [27] 皮亚彬,薄文广,何力武.城市区位、城市规模与中国城市化路径[J].经济与管理研究,2014(3):59-65.
    [28] 刘小康."行政区经济"概念再探讨[J].中国行政管理,2010(3):42-47.
    [29] 金祥荣,赵雪娇.行政权分割、市场分割与城市经济效率:基于计划单列市视角的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2017(3):14-25.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

曾鹏,李洪涛,邢小玉,胡月.中心城市首位度对区域经济协调发展的影响研究——基于中国19个城市群的分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(1):56-69. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.11.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-28
文章二维码