制造业自主创新、外国技术溢出与全球价值链地位
作者:
中图分类号:

F740.6

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目"区域价值链合作视角下GMS制造业价值链演进机理与升级路径研究"(72063020);云南省哲学社会科学规划项目重点项目"区域价值链合作视角下云南省制造业价值链升级路径研究"(ZD201904);昆明理工大学管理与经济学院硕博生科研预研项目激励计划


Independent manufacturing innovation, foreign technology spillovers, and global value chain status
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在产品内分工成为国际主要分工模式的背景下,开展自主创新、外国技术溢出对制造业价值链攀升的影响研究对于促进我国产业迈向全球价值链中高端,培育若干世界级先进制造业集群的目标而言具有十分现实且重要的作用。为探讨自主创新、外国技术溢出对制造业价值链攀升的影响作用,并进一步明确一国技术吸收能力在这一过程中的效应,文章首先在理论层面上分析了自主创新和外国技术溢出对制造业全球价值链地位的作用及其影响机制,在此基础上借助2018版TIVA数据库,测算了从2005年到2015年这11年间的中国制造业行业全球价值链地位指数,进而构建了行业层面上的面板数据,采用固定效应模型、分位数回归、面板Tobit等研究方法实证检验制造业自主创新、外国技术溢出对其全球价值链攀升的影响及机制。研究结果表明:自主创新是拉动中国制造业全球价值链地位攀升的主要引擎;而外国专利申请引致的技术溢出和外商投资引致的技术溢出对中国制造业全球价值链攀升有阻碍作用,是造成我国制造业全球价值链"低端锁定"的主要因素。但外国专利申请引致的技术溢出和外商投资引致的技术溢出均可以经过制造业的消化吸收后对中国制造业全球价值链攀升产生正向影响,这说明制造业对技术溢出的吸收能力是促进外国技术溢出推动其全球价值链攀升的关键。但这一关键作用呈现出明显的行业异质性特征,部分行业的外资技术溢出间接效应估计结果不明显。这可能是因为我国制造业技术水平整体上与发达国家还存在较大差距,对外国技术溢出的吸收消化能力不强导致的。进一步,文章在间接效应分析、异质性检验和面板工具变量法等研究方法的基础上再次明确在中外技术差距较大、中国人力资本质量较低、不同技术行业发展侧重点存在差异的背景下,制造业自主创新、外国技术溢出对其全球价值链地位提升的影响存在异质性的特征。显然,这些研究结论对于我国制造业在嵌入全球价值链分工体系的背景下,思考如何根据自身发展实际实现制造业转型升级,培育若干世界级先进制造业集群具有十分重要的启示意义。

    Abstract:

    Under the background that the division of labor within products has become the main international division of labor, the research on the impact of independent innovation and foreign technology spillovers on the rise of the manufacturing value chain is important for promoting China’s industry toward the middle and high end of the global value chain and fostering several world-class advanced manufacturing clusters. As far as the goal is concerned, it has a very realizing and important role. In order to explore the effects of independent innovation and foreign technology spillovers on the ascent of the manufacturing value chain, and to further clarify the role of a country’s technology absorptive capacity in this process, the article first analyzes the effects of independent innovation and foreign technology spillovers on manufacturing at the theoretical level. On this basis, with the help of the 2018 TIVA database, the global value chain status index of China’s manufacturing industry during the 11 years from 2005 to 2015 is calculated, and then the industry level is constructed. The panel data, using fixed-effects model, quantile regression, panel Tobit and other research methods, is employed to empirically test the influence and mechanism of manufacturing independent innovation and foreign technology spillovers on the rise of global value chains. The research results show that independent innovation is the main engine driving the rise of China’s manufacturing global value chain status; while technology spillovers caused by foreign patent applications and technology spillovers caused by foreign investment have hindered the rise of China’s manufacturing global value chain, and are the main factor of "low-end lock-in" in the manufacturing global value chain of China. However, technology spillovers caused by foreign patent applications and technology spillovers caused by foreign investment can both be digested and absorbed by the manufacturing industry and have a positive impact on the rise of the global value chain of China’s manufacturing industry. Technology spillovers are the key to promoting the rise of its global value chain. However, this key role shows obvious industry heterogeneity, and the estimation results of the indirect effects of foreign capital technology spillovers in some industries are not obvious. This may be because the overall technological level of China’s manufacturing industry is still far behind that of developed countries, and its ability to absorb and digest foreign technology spillovers is not strong. Furthermore, based on the research methods of indirect effect analysis, heterogeneity test and panel instrumental variable method, the article once again clarifies that there is a large technological gap between China and foreign countries, the quality of human capital in China is low, and the development focus of different technology industries is different. The influence of manufacturing independent innovation and foreign technology spillovers on the promotion of its status in the global value chain is heterogeneous. Obviously, these research conclusions have very important enlightenment significance for thinking about how to realize the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry according to its own development and cultivate several world-class advanced manufacturing clusters under the background of the division of labor in the global value chain.

    参考文献
    [1] BALDWIN R,LOPEZ-GONZALEZ J.Supply-chain trade:A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses[J].The World Economy,2015,38(11):1682-1721.
    [2] 戴翔,李洲,张雨.服务投入来源差异、制造业服务化与价值链攀升[J].财经研究,2019(5):30-43.
    [3] HUMPHREY J,SCHMITZ H.How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?[J].Regional Studies,2002,36(9):1017-1027.
    [4] 黄先海,杨高举.中国高技术产业的国际分工地位研究:基于非竞争型投入占用产出模型的跨国分析[J].世界经济,2010(5):82-100.
    [5] 戴翔.服务业"两化"趋势与我国服务出口复杂度的提升战略[J].国际贸易,2015(5):60-66.
    [6] 胡昭玲,宋佳.基于出口价格的中国国际分工地位研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013(3):15-25.
    [7] 吕越,罗伟,刘斌.融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升[J].金融研究,2016(6):81-96.
    [8] GEREFFI G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain[J].Journal of International Economics,1999,48(1):37-70.
    [9] 刘志彪.全球化背景下中国制造业升级的路径与品牌战略[J].财经问题研究,2005(5):25-31.
    [10] FORBES N,WIELD D.Fromfollowers to leaders:Managingtechnology and innovation in newly industrialized countries[M].London,New York:Routledge,2002.
    [11] 潘闽,张自然.产业集聚与中国工业行业全球价值链嵌入[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017(5):108-112.
    [12] 胡军,陶锋,陈建林.珠三角OEM企业持续成长的路径选择:基于全球价值链外包体系的视角[J].中国工业经济,2005(8):42-49.
    [13] 王一鸣,王君.关于提高企业自主创新能力的几个问题[J].中国软科学,2005(7):10-14,32.
    [14] 凌丹,张小云.技术创新与全球价值链升级[J].中国科技论坛,2018(10):53-61,100.
    [15] 肖利平,谢丹阳.国外技术引进与本土创新增长:互补还是替代:基于异质吸收能力的视角[J].中国工业经济,2016(9):75-92.
    [16] 何雄浪,张泽义.国际进口贸易技术溢出效应、本国吸收能力与经济增长互动:理论及来自中国的证据[J].世界经济研究,2014(11):36-41,48,88.
    [17] KOOPMAN R,POWERS W,WANG Z,et al.Give credit where credit is due:Tracing value added in global production chains[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2010.
    [18] 李平,崔喜君.进口贸易与国外专利申请对中国区域技术进步的影响:基于东、中、西部面板数据的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2007(1):28-32.
    [19] 杨俊,李平.要素市场扭曲、国际技术溢出与出口技术复杂度[J].国际贸易问题,2017(3):51-62.
    [20] HU A G.Propensity to patent,competition and China’s foreign patenting surge[J].Research Policy,2010,39(7):985-993.
    [21] 汪晓文,杜欣.中国经济增长方式转变的影响因素及路径选择[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):104-111.
    [22] 李超,张诚.中国对外直接投资与制造业全球价值链升级[J].经济问题探索,2017(11):114-126.
    [23] 曲如晓,臧睿.自主创新、外国技术溢出与制造业出口产品质量升级[J].中国软科学,2019(5):18-30.
    [24] 谢建国,张宁.技术差距、技术溢出与中国的技术进步:基于中美行业贸易数据的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2020(1):12-24,135.
    [25] 屠年松,薛丹青.中国—中南半岛经济走廊国家全球价值链升级研究[J].经济问题,2018(2):123-129.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

屠年松,龚凯翔.制造业自主创新、外国技术溢出与全球价值链地位[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(1):88-101. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2021.03.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:736
  • 下载次数: 1009
  • HTML阅读次数: 1023
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-28
文章二维码