区域城市群人才生态系统评价研究
作者:
中图分类号:

C962;C964.2

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重点项目"完善干部担当作为的激励机制研究"(20AZD020)


Research on the evaluation of talent ecosystem inregional urban agglomeration
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    人才作为生产关系中最为活跃的因素,在推动社会发展进步中的地位全面超越能源、资本等要素,成为最具创造力的战略资源。党的二十大提出"人才是第一资源、创新是第一动力,深入实施科教兴国战略、人才强国战略、创新驱动发展战略,开辟发展新领域新赛道,不断塑造发展新动能新优势",其战略指向直接瞄准高质量发展、大国复兴和建设世界强国,人才是创新的根基,创新驱动实质上是人才驱动,但从当前我国创新驱动发展的形势看,主要面临着高层次人才占比较低、区域人才发展不平衡、人才创新活力不足等一系列发展难题,这在一定程度上制约着人才强国建设和伟大复兴进程,破解这些历史性的问题,需要在人才开发治理中寻找答案。随着当前我国整体迈入新发展阶段,以长三角、珠三角、京津冀、成渝、长江中游为代表的城市群作为区域一体化发展的关键引擎和人才创新集聚的主要载体,在经济社会高质量发展中扮演着重要角色,在经历了几轮激烈的人才争夺战后,区域城市群人才竞争已从以往单纯的比拼数量规模逐渐演变为人才价值创造能级和人才生态系统的综合较量。因此,评价人才生态系统建设成效对于推动区域城市群产业结构优化升级和区域人才一体化发展具有重要意义。本文针对现有研究多侧重于从宏观视野构建客观指标体系,忽视了人才的主观感受进而导致实证结果存在偏误的不足,以成渝城市群为研究对象,构建了中国场景下区域城市群人才生态系统主客观指标评价体系,采用K-means聚类和灰色关联度对成渝城市群人才生态系统的变化规律、指标关联度进行比较分析。研究发现:成渝城市群人才生态系统经历了起步改善、快速提升、重点调整的三阶段发展过程,其中政策环境对人才生态系统的贡献系数最高,经济环境改善最为明显,生活环境则呈明显下降趋势;从区域发展来看,成渝城市群内部人才生态系统发展差异明显,中心城市的辐射带动能力和区域城市的功能性作用还有待进一步加强。为此,成渝城市群推动人才高质量发展可从以下三方面入手:一要壮大经济发展新动能,多渠道吸引人才集聚;二要落实以人为本的人才价值理念,打造近悦远来的人才生态系统;三要加快人力资源服务业发展,建设高效优质的人才生态系统。

    Abstract:

    As the most active factor in production relations, talents play a more important role in promoting social development and progress than energy, capital and other factors, and become the most creative strategic resources. The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed that "talent is the primary resource, and innovation is the primary driver of growth. We will fully implement the strategy for invigorating China through science and education, the workforce development strategy, and the innovation-driven development strategy. We will open up new areas and new arenas in development and steadily foster new growth drivers and new strengths". Its strategic orientation is directly aimed at high-quality development, rejuvenation of the country and building a world power. Talents are the foundation of innovation, and innovation driven development is essentially talent driven. However, from the current situation of innovation driven development in China, we are mainly facing a series of development problems, such as the relatively low proportion of high-level talents, the unbalanced development of regional talents, and the lack of innovative vitality of talents. To a certain extent, this restricts the construction of a talent-strong country and the great rejuvenation process. To solve these historical problems, we need to find answers in talent development and governance. As China as a whole enters a new stage of development, urban agglomerations represented by the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Chengdu-Chongqing region and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, as the key engine of regional integration development and the main carrier of talent innovation and agglomeration, play an important role in high-quality economic and social development. After several rounds of fierce competition for talent, talent competition in regional urban agglomerations has gradually evolved from a simple competition in quantity and scale to a comprehensive competition in talent value creation level and talent ecosystem. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of talent ecosystem construction is of great significance for promoting the optimization and upgrading of regional urban agglomeration industrial structure and the integrated development of regional talents. In view of the deficiency that existing studies mostly focus on building objective indicator systems from a macro perspective, ignoring the subjective feelings of talents, which leads to biased empirical results, this paper takes Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration as the research object, constructs a subjective and objective indicator evaluation system of regional urban agglomeration talent ecosystem under the Chinese scenario, and uses K-means clustering and grey correlation degree to compare and analyze the change laws and correlation degree of indicators. The research finds that the talent ecosystem of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has gone through three stages of development: starting improvement, rapid improvement and key adjustment. Among them, the contribution coefficient of policy environment to talent ecosystem is the highest, the improvement of the economic environment is the most obvious, and the living environment shows a significant downward trend. From the perspective of regional development, there are obvious differences in the development of talent ecosystem within Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, and the radiation and driving ability of central cities and the functional role of regional cities need to be further strengthened. Therefore, Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration can promote the high-quality development of talents from the following three aspects: first, the new driving force of economic development should be strengthened to attract talents through multiple channels; second, the people-oriented talent value concept should be implemented to create a talent ecosystem that is close and pleasant; third, the development of human resources service industry should be accelerated to build an efficient and high-quality talent ecosystem.

    参考文献
    [1] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利—在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2017.
    [2] 孙锐,王通讯.什么样的人才环境才能加快培养一支站立在世界前沿的创新创业人才队伍[J].决策探索(上),2020(11):56-60.
    [3] 习近平.在欧美同学会成立100周年庆祝大会上的讲话[EB/OL]. (2013-10-21)[2022-12-16].http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2013/1021/c64094-23277634.html.
    [4] 沈邦仪.人才生态论[M].北京:北京蓝天出版社,2005.
    [5] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N]. 人民日报,2022-10-26(01).
    [6] 陈建俞,沈慧青.中国人才生态学研究现状及发展趋势[J].科技导报,2019(10):74-80.
    [7] 肖克奇, 易本谊.新时期人才生态环境建设[J].人才开发, 2003(11):42-43.
    [8] 黄梅, 吴国蔚.人才生态环境综合评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究, 2009(1):62-65.
    [9] 王顺.我国城市人才环境综合评价指标体系研究[J].中国软科学, 2004(3):149-151.
    [10] 刘帮成.嘉兴市人才发展蓝皮书[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2018.
    [11] 郭跃进,朱平利.我国区域科技人才竞争力评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014(8):130-134.
    [12] 梁文群, 郝时尧, 牛冲槐.我国区域高层次科技人才发展环境评价与比较[J].科技进步与对策, 2014(9):147-151.
    [13] 商华, 邱赵东.战略性新兴产业人才生态环境定量评价研究[J].科研管理,2017(11):137-146.
    [14] 崔少泽,邱华昕,王苏桐. 城市人才吸引力评价模型研究——以深圳市为例[J]. 科研管理,2021(7):60-67.
    [15] 郝金磊,韩静.西部地区科技创新人才生态环境评价研究[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):37-43.
    [16] WANG H. Talented person gathering: Foundation promise of development industry cluster development[J].Economic Problem Exploration,2004(12):104-106.
    [17] KARREN R J. Talent flow: A strategic approach to keeping good employees, helping them grow, and letting them go[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2002, 55(2):548-550.
    [18] LOWMAN G H. Moving beyond identification: Using gamification to attract and retain talent[J].Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2016(70):677-682.
    [19] SCOTT A J. The technopoles of Southern California[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2008, 22(12):1575-1605.
    [20] EARLE H A. Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent[J]. Journal of Facilities Management, 2003(2).
    [21] 刘帮成,张莹,陈鼎祥.新发展格局下的区域人才一体化:理论与实践[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2021.
    [22] 徐倪妮,郭俊华.科技人才流动的宏观影响因素研究[J].科学学研究,2019(3):414-421,461.
    [23] 陈鹏,张吉军.创新人才成长环境影响因子排序分析[J].统计与决策,2017(11):49-52.
    [24] 王见敏,康峻珲,王杰.基于AHP模型的人才发展环境评价分析—以贵州省为例[J].贵州财经大学学报,2019(1):103-110.
    [25] 郭俊华,程聪慧,何军,等.基于熵权法的科技人才项目绩效评价研究——以上海市"浦江人才"计划为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015(19):119-125.
    [26] 龚艳冰,巢妍.基于数据场K-means聚类的农村贫困人口精准分级研究——以贵州省某镇为例[J].软科学,2019(6):135-139.
    [27] 李海超,王美东.高技术产业对城市群经济增长的带动作用研究[J].科学学研究,2019(6):1006-1012,1021.
    [28] 耿子恒,汪文祥.人才生态视域下的人才集聚策略研究——河北雄安新区的探索[J].经济论坛,2020(4):48-60.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李林威,刘帮成.区域城市群人才生态系统评价研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(1):135-150. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2022.12.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:222
  • 下载次数: 658
  • HTML阅读次数: 862
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-28
文章二维码