农村基层治理的技术契合与创新进路
作者:
中图分类号:

D422.6

基金项目:

研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目(22ZDA122);中国人民公安大学2022年度基本科研业务费学科基础理论体系项目"公安人力资源管理数字化转型研究"(2022JKF02026)


The technology agreement and innovation approach of rural grassroots governance
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [40]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    党的二十大就全面推进乡村振兴作出重要部署。利用先进的技术手段推进农村基层治理现代化既是社会治理的重要范畴,也是实现乡村振兴战略的基础和根本保障。在推进农村基层社会治理的进程中由权威治理方式向技术治理转变已经成为不可遏制的趋势,而技术可以或正在成功解决基层治理中一些长久积累的困境。由传统权威治理到现代技术治理再到整体性治理,农村基层治理模式并非一个固化的理论和实践体系,尤其是在物联网、大数据、智能技术等推动下,信息技术不断提升治理效率、重塑治理格局、破解治理难题。借助现代化的技术和创新模式,信息技术具有的显著特征与基层治理存在诸多内在契合,信息技术和人工智能技术都在影响和改变着基层治理,并引起基层治理目标、决策、收益等内部治理机制的变革。信息技术创新与农村治理的紧密契合、渗透,将推进农村信息化,转变农村治理范式,为农村治理增添新的活力和动力。利用大数据技术、智能技术、物联网技术等对农村现存数据进行快速收集、挖掘、分析、研判、预测以及共享,为农村基层治理精确预判和科学决策提供常态数据和信息,从而让农村基层治理更加精细化、智能化,推动基层治理的精确化进程。村民依靠自身力量,借助科技力量重新塑造基层治理模式,力图打破农村社会的内卷化,推动农村经济发展和各项事业的全面进步和发展,真正实现村民自治。通过大数据助力农村基层治理,将解决民生痛点,保证民众安全,夯实民生保障、推进综合治理等方面的成果惠及村民,以实现"共享",满足民众的获得感、幸福感以及安全感。依托和运用智慧技术手段,全面、广泛和深入地提供灵活创新的基层治理措施和方案,智慧治理更能够体现人与技术之间构建的一种默契的、相互融洽配合的共生关系。可以认为,技术必须不断融入农村基层治理,将互联网思维植根于基层治理体系创新进程中,立足农村居民的现实需求,创新治理方式和手段,推动技术发展与基层治理的深度融合。但是技术并不是中立的存在,只有建立优良的法制规范才能带来社会的稳定秩序。技术治理融入农村是一个渐进式的过程,要根据实际状况采取差异化技术创新战略,探索农村基层治理的创新路径。技术治理的最终优势在于其保持的规范性和理性,基层治理能力更需要依赖全域全要素整体治理得以持续完善。技术治理必须以完善规范的制度体系为保障,统筹规划基层各个部门和机构综合治理机制,激发基层治理的内生动力,推进农村基层治理现代化进程,从而实现全体人民共同富裕。

    Abstract:

    According to the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), we must persevere in advancing rural revitalization across the board. Using advanced technical means to promote the modernization of grassroots governance in rural areas is not only an important category of social governance, but also the foundation and basic guarantee for realizing the strategy of rural revitalization. In advancing grassroots social governance in rural areas, the transformation from authority governance to technical governance has become an irresistible trend, and technology can tackle or is tackling some long-term accumulated difficulties in grassroots governance. From traditional authority governance to modern technical governance to overall governance, the model of grassroots governance in rural areas is not an inflexible theoretical and practical system. Driven by the internet of things, big data and intelligent technology, information technology has been improving the efficiency, reshaping the pattern and tackling difficult problems of governance. There is much inner coherence between the marked feature of information technology and grassroots governance. By means of modern technology and innovation mode, information technology and artificial intelligence technology are affecting and changing grassroots governance, causing transformations of its internal governance mechanisms in goals, decisions and benefits. The close integration of information technology innovation and rural governance will promote the application of information technology in rural areas, change the paradigm of rural governance, and add new energy and vitality to rural governance. Big data technology, intelligent technology and internet of things technology can be applied to quickly collect, exploit, analyze, study, predict and share the existing data in rural areas, which will provide normal data and information for accurate prediction and scientific decision-making of rural grassroots governance, making rural grassroots governance more refined and intelligent and promoting the accurate process of grassroots governance. Relying on their own strength, villagers are trying to reshape the grassroots governance model and find a way out of the involution of rural society with the help of science and technology, which will promote the overall progress and development of rural economy and other undertakings and truly realize self-governance by villagers. The application of big data technology will help to solve the pain points for people’s livelihood, ensure people’s safety, lay a foundation for people’s livelihood and promote comprehensive governance. The fruits will benefit all villagers, which means "sharing", and meet people’s sense of gain, happiness and security. By relying on and using intelligent technical means to provide flexible and innovative measures and solutions of grassroots governance in a comprehensive, wide and deep way, intelligent governance can better reflect a tacit and harmonious symbiotic relationship between people and technology. Technology must continue to be integrated into rural grassroots governance, root internet thinking in the innovation process of grassroots governance system. Based on the actual needs of rural residents, we must innovate governance means so as to promote the high and deep integration of technological development and grassroots governance. However, technology is not neutral. Only by establishing good legal norms can we maintain social stability and order. The integration of technical governance into rural areas is a gradual process. We should adopt differentiated technological innovation strategy according to the actual situation and explore the innovation path of rural grassroots governance. Since the ultimate advantage of technical governance lies in its standardization and rationality, the capacity of grassroots governance needs to rely more on the overall governance of the whole region and all elements to be improved constantly. Technical governance must be guaranteed by the system which features standardizing and regulating technology and comprehensively plan the comprehensive governance mechanism of various grassroots departments and institutions, so as to stimulate the endogenous growth momentum of grassroots governance and promote the modernization process of rural grassroots governance.

    参考文献
    [1] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N]. 人民日报,2022-10-26(01).
    [2] 中共中央国务院关于全面推进乡村振兴加快农业农村现代化的意见[EB/OL].(2021-02-21)[2022-09-22].http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zwdt/202102/t20210221_6361863.htm.
    [3] 林瑜胜.社会治理现代化背景下乡村振兴路径[N].中国社会科学报,2021-11-03(05).
    [4] 赵秋倩,夏显力,王进.逆城镇化、乡贤回归与乡村振兴——基于浙中X村的田野调查[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):54-64.
    [5] DUNLEAVY P,MARGETTS H,BASTOW S,et al.Digital era governance:It corporations,the state,and e-government[M].Oxford University Press,2006.
    [6] DUNLEAVY P,MARGETTS H.The advent of digital government:Public bureaucracies and the state in the internet age[C]//2000 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,2000.
    [7] KATSONIS M, BOTROS A.Digital government:A primer and professional perspectives[J].Australian Journal of Public Administration,2015,74(1):42-52.
    [6] GARCIA ALONSO R, LIPPEZ-DE CASTRO S.Technology helps,people make:A smart city governance framework grounded in deliberative democracy[M]//Smarter as the New Urban Agenda.Cham: Springer International Publishing,2016:333-347.
    [9] 李华.问题导向的整体性城市治理模式建构[J].社会科学家,2018(11):47-57.
    [10] 刘道春."互联网+"破解城市管理之困[J].信息化建设,2018(12):58-59.
    [11] 赵欣.数字技术驱动社区治理的转型研究[J].地方治理研究,2022(4):26-36,78.
    [12] 郭大林.从"数字化"到"互联网+":城市管理的多元共治之道[J].求实,2018(6):74-84,109.
    [13] 杨宏山,齐建宗.数字化城市管理模式[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:2-35.
    [14] 姜晓晖.信息技术驱动下官僚科层制的发展进阶、衍生问题与优化路径[J].国外社会科学,2022(4):73-83,197-198.
    [15] 刘叶婷,唐斯斯.大数据对政府治理的影响及挑战[J].电子政务,2014(6):20-29.
    [16] 文丰安. 新时代城乡共同富裕融合发展论——基于对党的二十大精神的学习与研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):272-285.
    [17] 马思远.整合与回应:乡镇治理现代化改革的路径选择:基于浙江省嵊州市乡镇治理创新实践[J].哈尔滨市委党校学报,2015(3):63-69.
    [18] 邓大才.中国农村产权变迁与经验:来自国家治理视角下的启示[J].中国社会科学,2017(1):4-24,204.
    [19] 渠桂萍.二十世纪前期中国基层政权代理人的"差役化"[J].中国社会科学,2013(1):95-112.
    [20] 黄仁宇.资本主义与二十一世纪[M]. 北京:三联书店,1997:56.
    [21] 李志强.转型期农村社会组织治理场域演进[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2016(2):145-152.
    [22] 陈益元.后公社时期的国家权力与农村社会:研究回顾与展望[J].中国农史,2006(2):125-131.
    [23] 马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].阎克文,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
    [24] 张丙宣.政府的技术治理逻辑[J].自然辩证法通讯,2018(5):95-102.
    [25] 汪磊.人而非自然的话语:脱域演进中社会信任的式微与重建[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2013(3):98-104.
    [26] 何植民,邵红霞.运用整体性治理思维实践精准扶贫[N].中国社会科学报,2017-08-30(6).
    [27] 王娟娟.整体性治理视角下中国智慧政府发展路径探究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2017.
    [28] 王振兴,韩伊静,李云新.大数据背景下社会治理现代化:解读、困境与路径[J].电子政务,2019(4):84-92.
    [29] 李严昌.主题·问题·破题:社区精准治理机制研究:基于重庆市L街道的案例分析[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):76-84.
    [30] 夏国锋,刘辉.从"网格化管理"到"网络化治理":社会管理模式与秩序观的转型[J].湖北文理学院学报,2012(10):27-30,36.
    [31] 邝小军,马斌,刘新春.网络信息技术推进农村社会治理的作用路径[J].理论导刊,2018(1):98-101.
    [32] 陈晓运.技术治理:中国城市基层社会治理的新路向[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(6):123-127,191.
    [33] 高奇琦,陈建林.大数据公共治理:思维、构成与操作化[J].人文杂志,2016(6):103-111.
    [34] 王磊,陈林林.人工智能驱动下智能化社会治理:技术逻辑与机制创新[J].大连干部学刊,2019(2):58-64.
    [35] 翟云.人工智能+政务:开启智慧治理新征程[N].学习时报,2019-08-16(3).
    [36] 李齐.信息社会简约高效基层管理体制的构建[J].中国行政管理,2018(7):63-70.
    [37] 陈荣卓,戴欢欢.信息化条件下乡村治理联结的再建:结构与路径[J].社会主义研究,2022(5):105-112.
    [38] 张红霞,姜文静.城镇化背景下的农村治理:秩序冲突与重构路径[J].党政干部学刊,2016(5): 66-69.
    [39] 向玉琼.技术理性—经验理性的背离与融合:决策模型的演进轨迹[J].上海行政学院学报,2022(3):16-25.
    [40] 孙会岩,王玉莹.制度逻辑:基层社会治理中数字形式主义问题的反思与超越[J/OL].电子政务:1-8.[2022-11-05].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5181.TP.20221027.2108.004.html.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

韩春梅,李侠,张玉琢.农村基层治理的技术契合与创新进路[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(1):278-290. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. zs.2020.03.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:777
  • 下载次数: 897
  • HTML阅读次数: 1007
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-28
文章二维码