“双循环”新发展格局下数字经济驱动消费增长的机制与路径:基于有调节的中介效应检验
作者:
中图分类号:

F724;F727;F49

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"一带一路区域价值链构建与中国产业转型升级研究"(18ZDA038);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目"河南省跨境电商全产业链集聚演化机制及实现路径研究"(2020BJJ025)


The mechanism and path of digital economy driving consumption growth under the new development pattern of “dual circulation”: Based on the moderated mediation effect test
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章基于"双循环"新发展格局背景,首先从内部和外部结合、供需两侧结合的角度采用倒推法构建了数字经济驱动消费增长的理论逻辑框架,即"双循环新发展格局←国内循环为主体←扩大内需←供需匹配←产业升级和创新←数字经济"。接着选取中国286个地级市的数据,采用聚类分析法描述各城市数字经济发展水平并进行对比分析。研究发现:不同层级城市的数字经济增速存在明显区别,数字经济一线城市的数字经济指数水平远高于其他四个层级城市,但是数字经济五线城市的增速远超一线城市,表现出十足后劲;从数字经济和消费的拟合情况可以看出,数字经济和消费增长呈正相关关系;数字经济与产业结构升级、产业结构升级与消费增长之间都呈现一定的正向关系,但是现实情况也显示出产业结构优化指数比较高的城市没有能明显表现出相对应的良好消费势头。进一步建立有调节的中介效应模型对数字经济对消费增长的影响机制进行了实证检验。结果显示:从全样本层面看,数字经济对消费增长的总效应显著为正,说明数字经济能够在促进消费、拉动内需上发挥一定的作用。另外,产业结构升级的中介效应显著为正,说明数字经济能够通过推进产业结构升级从而促进消费增长,但是这个中介效应具有一定的地域差异。分区域看,产业结构升级的中介效应在东部地区不显著,在中西部地区显著,东部地区中介效应不显著的主要原因是产业结构升级影响消费增长这一路径发生阻滞导致。产生这一现象的主要原因是东部地区产业结构升级已经达到一定的高度,但是在推动消费升级上还存在一些结构错配问题。进一步使用科技经费支出作为调节变量对东部地区进行检验,检验结果发现科技经费对数字经济影响消费增长的作用具有正向调节作用,而且当科技经费支出越高时,产业结构升级在数字经济与消费之间的中介效应会显著增强,即具有被调节的中介效应。这说明提升科技经费支出有助于矫正东部地区受阻的路径,使得整个产业结构升级的中介路径得以畅通。最后提出了有针对性的对策建议。文章从产业结构升级的视角对数字经济影响消费增长的内部作用机制进行理论和实证分析,并对阻滞的路径进行合理的调节,这为政府加快构建"双循环"新发展格局提供有效政策借鉴。

    Abstract:

    Based on the background of the new development pattern of "dual circulation", firstly, this article uses the backward inference method from the perspective of the integration of internal and external, and the combination of both sides of supply and demand to construct a theoretical and logical framework for the digital economy to drive consumption growth, that is, "the new development pattern of dual circulation←domestic circulation as the main body←expansion of domestic demand←supply and demand matching←industrial structural upgrading and innovation←digital economy". Secondly, this paper selects data from 286 prefecture-level cities in China, uses cluster analysis to describe the level of digital economy development in each city and conducts a comparative analysis. It is found that there are obvious differences in the digital economy growth rate of cities at different levels. The digital economy index level of the first-tier cities of the digital economy is much higher than that of the other four-tier cities, but the growth rate of the fifth-tier cities of the digital economy far exceeds that of the first-tier cities. It can be seen from the fitting situation of the digital economy and consumption that the digital economy and consumption growth are positively correlated; the digital economy and industrial structure upgrading, industrial structure upgrading and consumption growth have a certain positive relationship, but the reality is that cities with a relatively high industrial structure optimization index have not clearly shown a corresponding good consumption momentum. The paper further establishes a moderated mediation effect model to empirically test the influence mechanism of the digital economy on consumption growth. The results show that from the full sample level, the overall effect of the digital economy on consumption growth is significantly positive, indicating that the digital economy can play a certain role in promoting consumption and stimulating domestic demand. In addition, the mediating effect of industrial structure upgrading is significantly positive, indicating that the digital economy can promote consumption growth by promoting industrial structure upgrading, but this mediating effect has certain regional differences. From a regional perspective, the intermediary effect of industrial structure upgrading is not significant in the eastern region, and significant in the central and western regions. The main reason for the insignificant intermediary effect of the eastern region is that the path of industrial structure upgrading affecting consumption growth is blocked. The main reason for this phenomenon is that the industrial structure upgrading in the eastern region has reached a certain height, but there are still some structural mismatch problems in promoting consumption upgrading. Further, this research uses science and technology expenditures as a moderating variable to test the eastern region. The test results find that science and technology expenditures have a positive regulatory effect on the digital economy's impact on consumption growth, and when the science and technology expenditures are higher, the intermediary effect of the industrial structure upgrading between digital economy and consumption will be significantly enhanced, that is, there will be a regulated intermediary effect. This shows that increasing the expenditure on science and technology will help correct the blocked path in the eastern region, and make the intermediate path for the entire industrial structure upgrading unblocked. Finally, targeted countermeasures and suggestions are putting forward. From the perspective of industrial structure upgrading, the article conducts theoretical and empirical analysis of the internal mechanism of the digital economy influencing consumption growth, and makes reasonable adjustments to the path of obstruction. This provides an effective policy reference for the government to accelerate the construction of a new "dual circulation" development pattern.

    参考文献
    [1] MESENBOURG T L.Measuring the digital Economy[R].United States Bureau of the Census,2001:1-9.
    [2] 张鹏.数字经济的本质及其发展逻辑[J].经济学家,2019(2):25-33.
    [3] 向书坚,吴文君.OECD数字经济核算研究最新动态及其启示[J].统计研究,2018(12):3-15.
    [4] 丁守海,徐政.新格局下数字经济促进产业结构升级:机理、堵点与路径[J].理论学刊,2021(3):68-76.
    [5] 党琳,李雪松,申烁.制造业行业数字化转型与其出口技术复杂度提升[J].国际贸易问题,2021(6):32-47.
    [6] 段博,邵传林,段博.数字经济加剧了地区差距吗:来自中国284个地级市的经验证据[J].世界地理研究,2020(4):728-737.
    [7] 余南平.全球数字经济价值链"轴心时代"的塑造与变革[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(4):124-135,183.
    [8] 齐俊妍,任奕达.东道国数字经济发展水平与中国对外直接投资:基于"一带一路"沿线43国的考察[J].国际经贸探索,2020(9):55-71.
    [9] 王丽华.互联网背景下城镇居民消费行为影响因素分析[J].商业经济研究,2019(23):47-49.
    [10] 马玥.数字经济对消费市场的影响:机制、表现、问题及对策[J].宏观经济研究,2021(5):81-91.
    [11] ZENG M,REINARTZ W.Beyond online search:The road to profitability[J].California Management Review,2003,45(2):107-130.
    [12] 李继尊.关于互联网金融的思考[J].管理世界,2015(7):1-7,16.
    [13] 焦瑾璞.移动支付推动普惠金融发展的应用分析与政策建议[J].中国流通经济,2014(7):7-10.
    [14] 周广肃,梁琪.互联网使用、市场摩擦与家庭风险金融资产投资[J].金融研究,2018(1):84-101.
    [15] CAMPBELL J Y,MANKIW N G.The response of consumption to income:A cross-country investigation[J].European Economic Review,1991(35):723-767.
    [16] 潘锡泉.消费升级引领产业升级:作用机理及操作取向[J].当代经济管理,2019(3):11-16.
    [17] 张磊,刘长庚.供给侧改革背景下服务业新业态与消费升级[J].经济学家,2017(11):37-46.
    [18] 杨水根,王露.流通创新促进了农村居民消费升级吗:基于中国2004-2015年省际面板数据的实证研究[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):98-107,128.
    [19] 张超,颜建晔,康健.读万卷书,行万里路:学历水平对旅游消费的影响[J].技术经济,2020(8):114-118.
    [20] 孙早,许薛璐.产业创新与消费升级:基于供给侧结构性改革视角的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(7):98-116.
    [21] 金晓彤,黄蕊.技术进步与消费需求的互动机制研究:基于供给侧改革视域下的要素配置分析[J].经济学家,2017(2):50-57.
    [22] 许宪春,张美慧.中国数字经济规模测算研究:基于国际比较的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(5):23-41.
    [23] 张雪玲,焦月霞.中国数字经济发展指数及其应用初探[J].浙江社会科学,2017(4):32-40,157.
    [24] 腾讯研究院.中国"互联网+"数字经济指数(2018)[EB/OL].(2018-04-12)[2020-08-15].https://36kr.com/p/5128758.
    [25] 中国信息通信研究院.中国数字经济发展白皮书(2017)[EB/OL].(2017-07)[2020-09-10].http://111.1.62.107/files/6049000000F87641.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

梁会君.“双循环”新发展格局下数字经济驱动消费增长的机制与路径:基于有调节的中介效应检验[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(3):34-46. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2022.02.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:862
  • 下载次数: 1111
  • HTML阅读次数: 907
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-13
文章二维码