论法律援助的契约性理念——兼谈对我国法律援助体系的启示
作者:
中图分类号:

D926.5

基金项目:

江苏省社会科学基金项目"契约社会背景下的律师正义研究"(2022FXD007)


The contractual idea of legal aid: Also discuss about the enlightenment for the legal aid system in China
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2022年1月1日生效的《中华人民共和国法律援助法》将法律援助的体系化工作推进到一个新的高度,然而在制度体系不断完善的背景下,我国法律援助实践依然面临着诸多困难,突破这些困难的对策可能不仅需要完善法律制度,更要厘清制度背后的法理与实践背后的理念。因此,在法律援助制度改革的背景之下,有必要重新澄清对于法律援助理念的错误认知。这种错误的认知主要包含意志性和功利性的解读。法律援助的意志性理念主要包括三种形式:贵族精神、宗教启示以及精英意识。它们将法律援助立基于道德理想之上,而存在着供给不稳定以及人格不对等的弊病。法律援助的功利性理念,则主要包括两种形式:市场行为论和政府行为论。它们将法律援助立基于现实利益之上,而对律师职业的内在伦理价值和独立性构成了威胁。法律援助理念应当是一种契约性理念,它包含了两个层次的契约,即以公平原则为核心的原初契约以及作为子契约的"律师—社会"契约和"律师—国家"契约。契约性理念解释吸收了意志性和功利性理念的优点,并摒弃了它的不足,其主要具有四个优势:第一,联结了伦理与效用价值,使律师职业在赚取收益与保持法律援助积极性之间实现平衡;第二,重构了责任的概念,使其转被动为主动;第三,实现了法律援助模式的更新,使其由单向度的国家权力施予,变为多向度的多元实现;第四,重塑了互尊的状态,保护了被援助方的自尊。我国律师制度改革的精神与契约性理念是相契合的,它可以为我国法律援助体系的建设提供有益的启示:律师帮助权的基本权利定位、法律援助的多元参与模式、法律援助实践的细则化以及法律援助意识的培育。

    Abstract:

    The Legal Aid Law of the China, which came into effect on January 1, 2022, has pushed the systematization of legal aid to a new height. However, against the background of the continuous improvement of the system, China's legal aid practice still faces many difficulties. The countermeasures to overcome these difficulties may not only need to improve the legal system, but also clarify the legal theory behind the system and the concept behind the practice. Therefore, in the context of the reform of the legal aid system, it is necessary to clarify the erroneous understanding of the concept of legal aid. This erroneous understanding mainly includes interpretations of willpower and utilitarianism. The willpower concept of legal aid mainly includes three forms: aristocratic spirit, religious enlightenment, and elite consciousness. They base legal aid on moral ideals, but there are drawbacks such as unstable supply and unequal personality. The utilitarian concept of legal aid mainly includes two forms: market behavior theory and government behavior theory. They base legal aid on practical interests, posing a threat to the inherent ethical values and independence of the legal profession. The concept of legal aid should be a contractual concept, which includes two levels of contracts, namely the original contract centered on the principle of fairness, as well as the "lawyer society" contract and the "lawyer state" contract as sub contracts. The concept of contractual interpretation absorbs the advantages of willpower and utilitarianism, and discards its shortcomings. It mainly has four advantages: firstly, it connects ethical and utility values, enabling the lawyer profession to achieve a balance between earning profits and maintaining legal aid enthusiasm; Secondly, the concept of responsibility has been restructured to shift from passive to active; Thirdly, the legal aid model has been updated, transforming it from a unidirectional state power to a multi-dimensional and diverse implementation; Fourthly, it reshaped the state of mutual respect and protected the self-esteem of the recipients. The spirit of China's lawyer system reform is consistent with the contractual concept, which can provide useful enlightenment for the construction of China's legal aid system: the basic right positioning of the lawyer's right to help, the multiple participation mode of legal aid, the detailed rules of legal aid practice, and the cultivation of legal aid awareness.

    参考文献
    [1] 罗伯特.N.威尔金.法律职业的精神[M].王俊峰,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2013:25.
    [2] POUND R.The lawyer from antiquity to modern times[M].Sao Paulo:West publishing,1953:5.
    [3] 威尔弗雷德·波雷斯特.欧美早期的律师界[M].傅再明,张文彪,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:49.
    [4] H.W.埃尔曼.比较法律文化[M].贺卫方,高鸿钧,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2002:90-91.
    [5] 埃德蒙·柏克.自由与传统[M].蒋庆,王瑞昌,王天成,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001:35.
    [6] 王佳,黄相怀.西方政治法律传统中的贵族精神[J].学术界,2011(6):129-134,286.
    [7] 迈克尔·舒特.执业伦理与美国法律的新生[M].赵雪纲,牛玥,译.北京:当代中国出版社,2014:98.
    [8] RICHARD L A.American lawyers[M].New York and Oxford:Oxford University Press,1989:131.
    [9] ANDERSON E S.What is the point of equality?[J].Ethics,1999(2):287-337.
    [10] 理查德.A.波斯纳.道德和法律理论的疑问[M].苏力,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:215-219.
    [11] 贺海仁.法律援助:政府责任与律师义务[J].环球法律评论,2005(6):665-671.
    [12] 朱良好.法律援助责任主体论略[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(1):10-17.
    [13] 程滔.法律援助的责任主体[J].国家检察官学院学报, 2018(4):3-13,171.
    [14] 李学尧.法律职业主义[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007:241-242.
    [15] 罗伯特·戈登.律师独立论:律师独立于当事人[M].周潞嘉,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1989:99.
    [16] 张善燚.中国律师制度专题研究[M],长沙:湖南人民出版社,2007:73.
    [17] 德博拉.L.罗德.为了司法/正义:法律职业改革[M].张群,温珍奎,丁见民,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009:228.
    [18] 尤利乌斯·冯·基尔希曼.作为科学的法学的无价值性:在柏林法学会的演讲[M].赵阳,译.商务印书馆2016:22.
    [19] 约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
    [20] 毛兴贵.政治义务:证成与反驳[M]].南京:江苏人民出版社,2007:119.
    [21] 戴维·鲁本.律师与正义:一个伦理学研究[M].戴锐,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:227-228.
    [22] CRITON A C.Professional Ethics codes in court:Redefining the social contract between the public and the professions[J], Georgia Law Review.1991(25):1340.
    [23] 弗雷德里希·奥古斯特·冯·哈耶克.自由宪章[M].杨玉生,冯兴元,陈茅,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2012:114.
    [24] 程滔.法律援助制度的创新与发展:以《法律援助法》的颁布为视角[J].人民论坛,2022(9):100-103.
    [25] 樊崇义.我国法律援助立法与实践的哲理思维[J].江西社会科学,2021(6):167-178,256.
    [26] 黄东东.法律援助案件质量:问题、制约及其应对:以C市的调研为基础[J].法商研究,2015(4):54-62.
    [27] 谢澍.刑事法律援助之社会向度:从"政府主导"转向"政府扶持"[J].环球法律评论,2016(2):139-151.
    [28] 刘思达.割据的逻辑:中国法律服务市场的生态分析[M].上海:上海三联出版社,2011:93.
    [29] 李芳.锐意求新,再创辉煌:访第五届中华全国律师协会秘书长贾午光[N].法律服务时报,2002-05-24(6).
    [30] 玛莎.C.纳斯鲍姆.寻求有尊严的生活:正义的能力理论[M].田雷,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016:121.
    [31] 冀祥德.法律援助制度的中国特色[J].政治与法律,2022(6):148
    [32] SCOTT L C.The politics of pro bono[J]. UCLA Law Review,2004(52):3-40.
    [33] 安索尼.T.克罗曼.迷失的律师:法律职业理想的衰落[M].田凤常,译.北京:法律出版社,2010:269.
    [34] 霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎延弼,译.北京:商务印书馆,1985:580.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

蒋超.论法律援助的契约性理念——兼谈对我国法律援助体系的启示[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(4):241-252. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2019.10.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:221
  • 下载次数: 632
  • HTML阅读次数: 893
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-09-08
文章二维码