成渝地区双城经济圈撤县设区的经济效应研究
作者:
中图分类号:

D630;F127

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目"长江上游地区‘化工围江’的环境风险及差异化治理路径研究"(20CJL021)


Research on the economic effect of withdrawing counties into districts in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [30]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    科学合理的城市行政区划调整是提高国家治理能力和促进地方发展的有效途径,而"撤县(市)设区"政策是近年来行政区划调整的重要方式。成渝地区双城经济圈定位于具有全国影响力的重要经济中心,"撤县(市)设区"政策是否能成为区域经济发展的强大推力,需要从理论与实证两方面进行系统研究。文章基于2010—2019年共101个县域样本面板数据,采用定性与定量相结合的研究方法,通过双重差分模型探究政策实施对成渝地区双城经济圈经济发展的影响效应,从政策实施的具体区县与成渝地区双城经济圈整体两个层次进行效果检验,以综合研判"撤县(市)设区"政策对经济发展、区划调整、产业结构优化等方面的作用效果。研究结果表明:"撤县(市)设区"政策的实施对成渝地区双城经济圈县域经济体发展具有显著促进作用,能够加快经济发展进程;"撤县(市)设区"政策的实施效果在成渝地区双城经济圈内具有明显地区差异,重庆市的实施效果优于四川省;政策实施的促进作用为短期激励,且需经历一定适应期方能充分调配市政资源驱动县域经济发展,激励作用会随时间逐渐减弱。进一步的机制分析显示,产业聚集效应在政策实施地区的经济发展中具有显著促进作用。"撤县(市)设区"政策的实施可通过扩大城市规模、促进区域内大量企业聚集而带来的产业聚集效应来促进成渝地区双城经济圈经济发展。产业聚集效应能够降低运输成本、促进信息交流与提升分工合作效率,加快推动经济高质量发展。优化调整成渝地区双城经济圈行政区划,应考虑各地区发展条件,因地制宜地实施区划调整政策;协调中心城区与外围县域经济发展关系,根据区域未来发展规划,及时调整城区功能定位与县域发展格局;提升政策实施经济效率,科学合理挖掘资源潜力,优化区划调整内涵。文章从理论假说出发,经过系列实证分析检验,对典型内陆经济增长极县域经济区划调整的经济效应进行深入探讨,有利于拓展区划调整影响效应研究,可为地方政府行政区划优化提供一定参考。

    Abstract:

    Scientific and reasonable adjustment of urban administrative division is an effective way to improve national governance capacity and promote local development, and the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" is an important way of administrative division adjustment in recent years. Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle(abbr. CCEC) is positioned as an important economic center with national influence, so it needs to be systematically studied from both theoretical and empirical aspects whether the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" can become a strong thrust for regional economic development. Based on the panel data of 101 sample counties from 2010 to 2019, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, this paper explores the impact of policy implementation on the economic development of CCEC through the double difference model from the perspective of the specific counties and the overall economic circle. So that we can comprehensively study and judge the impact of the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" on economic development, zoning adjustment and industrial structure optimization. The results show that the implementation of the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" has a significant role in promoting the development of county economies in CCEC, which can accelerate the process of economic development. The implementation effect of the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" has obvious regional differences, among which the implementation effect of Chongqing is better than that of Sichuan. The promotion effect of policy implementation is short-term, and it needs to go through a certain adaptation period to fully allocate municipal resources to drive the development of county economy. The incentive effect will gradually weaken over time. Further mechanism analysis shows that industrial agglomeration effect plays a significant role in promoting the economic development of policy implementation areas. The implementation of the policy of "withdrawing counties into districts" can promote the economic development of CCEC by the industrial agglomeration effect brought by the expansion the city scale and the agglomeration of a large number of enterprises in the region. Industrial agglomeration effect can reduce transportation costs, improve information exchange and improve the efficiency of division of labor and cooperation, and accelerate the high-quality economic development of CCEC. To optimize and adjust the administrative division of CCEC, we should consider the development conditions of each region and implement the division adjustment policy according to local conditions; coordinate the economic development relationship between the central urban area and the surrounding counties, and timely adjust the functional orientation of the urban area and the development pattern of the county according to the future development plan of the region; improve the economic efficiency of policy implementation, scientifically and reasonably tap the potential of resources, and optimize the connotation of zoning adjustment. Starting from the theoretical hypothesis and through a series of empirical analysis and test, this paper makes an in-depth discussion on the economic effect of the county economic zoning adjustment of the typical inland economic growth pole, which is conducive to expand the research on the impact effect of zoning adjustment, and can provide a certain reference for the optimization of local government administrative zoning.

    参考文献
    [1] 纪小乐, 魏建.行政区划调整如何推动中国城市化的进程:动因、类型与方向[J].齐鲁学刊, 2019(3):109-116.
    [2] 聂伟, 陆军, 周文通.撤县设区改革影响撤并县域人口城镇化的机制研究:基于中心-外围城区资源配置视角[J].人口与发展, 2019(3):2-13.
    [3] 王禹澔, 张恩."撤县设区"研究刍议与展望[J].中国行政管理, 2021(2):116-122.
    [4] 秦鹏, 刘焕.成渝地区双城经济圈协同发展的理论逻辑与路径探索:基于功能主义理论的视角[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2):44-54.
    [5] 吉黎, 邹埴埸.撤县设区后地方财力增强了吗?[J].财政研究, 2019(12):61-74, 86.
    [6] 郭其友, 汪阳."撤县设区"的区域经济平衡增长效应的研究[J].南京社会科学, 2020(9):39-48.
    [7] 梁志艳, 赵勇.撤县设区是否提高了城市公共服务水平:基于双重差分倾向得分匹配法的评价[J].城市与环境研究, 2019(1):49-59.
    [8] 邓慧慧, 潘雪婷."大国大城"如何带动产业升级:来自撤县设区的经验证据[J].世界经济文汇, 2020(6):88-103.
    [9] 殷冠文, 刘云刚.区划调整的城市化逻辑与效应[J].经济地理, 2020(4):48-55.
    [10] 李郇, 徐现祥.中国撤县(市)设区对城市经济增长的影响分析[J].地理学报, 2015(8):1202-1214.
    [11] CARTIER C.A political economy of rank:The territorial administrative hierarchy and leadership mobility in urban China[J].Journal of Contemporary China, 2016, 25(100):529-546.
    [12] LIU Y G, LI Z G, JIN J.Pseudo-Urbanization or real urbanization? Urban China's mergence of administrative regions and its effects:a case study of Zhongshan city, Guangdong Province[J].China Review, 2014, 14(1):37-59.
    [13] MILAN B F, CREUTZIG F.Municipal policies accelerated urban sprawl and public debts in Spain[J].Land Use Policy, 2016, 54:103-115.
    [14] 唐为.分权、外部性与边界效应[J].经济研究, 2019(3):103-118.
    [15] TANG W, HEWINGS G J D.Do city-county mergers in China promote local economic development?[J].Economics of Transition, 2017, 25(3):439-469.
    [16] 卢盛峰, 陈思霞.政府偏袒缓解了企业融资约束吗:来自中国的准自然实验[J].管理世界, 2017(5):51-65, 187.
    [17] 钱金保, 邱雪情."撤县设区"如何影响财政收支:基于激励视角的再研究[J].南方经济, 2019(8):72-84.
    [18] 陈妤凡, 王开泳.撤县(市)设区对城市公共服务配置和空间布局的影响与作用机理[J].经济地理, 2019(5):76-86.
    [19] 张莉, 皮嘉勇, 宋光祥.地方政府竞争与生产性支出偏向:撤县设区的政治经济学分析[J].财贸经济, 2018(3):65-78.
    [20] 张天华, 陈博潮, 雷佳祺.经济集聚与资源配置效率:多样化还是专业化[J].产业经济研究, 2019(5):51-64.
    [21] 邵朝对, 苏丹妮, 包群.中国式分权下撤县设区的增长绩效评估[J].世界经济, 2018(10):101-125.
    [22] 彭洋, 许明, 卢娟.区域一体化对僵尸企业的影响:以撤县设区为例[J].经济科学, 2019(6):80-91.
    [23] 万陆, 李璐瑶.中国撤县设区政策的区域一体化效果评估[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(6):77-81.
    [24] 庄汝龙, 李光勤, 梁龙武, 等.撤县设区与区域经济发展:基于双重差分方法的政策评估[J].地理研究, 2020(6):1386-1400.
    [25] 詹新宇, 曾傅雯.行政区划调整提升经济发展质量了吗:来自"撤县设区"的经验证据[J].财贸研究, 2021(4):70-82.
    [26] 张军, 吴桂英, 张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究, 2004(10):35-44.
    [27] 游士兵, 祝培标.行政区划改革对地区经济发展影响的实证分析[J].统计与决策, 2017(2):79-83.
    [28] 易淼.新时代推动成渝地区双城经济圈建设探析:历史回顾与现实研判[J].西部论坛, 2021(3):72-81.
    [29] 鲁晓东, 连玉君.中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999-2007[J].经济学(季刊), 2012(2):541-558.
    [30] LEVINSOHN J, PETRIN A.Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J].The Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70(2):317-341.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄磊,贾淙,汪嘉涵.成渝地区双城经济圈撤县设区的经济效应研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(5):54-69. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.03.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:312
  • 下载次数: 654
  • HTML阅读次数: 434
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24
文章二维码