ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的意识形态风险及其应对
作者:
中图分类号:

D64;TP18

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重点项目"网络社会治理体系研究"(18AKS015)


The ideological risks of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and its response
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [32]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    意识形态风险防范是事关民族复兴、国家主权、文化建设的核心范畴。在当今人工智能技术蓬勃发展的数字时代,以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能技术内嵌渗透到社会生活领域之中,伴随着交互深度与辐射范围的不断扩展,裹挟了众多具有新特点的意识形态风险。清晰明辨ChatGPT等生成式人工智能产生意识形态风险的内在机理是防范生成式人工智能意识形态风险的前提。ChatGPT等生成式人工智能凭借内容生成的首要功能对意识形态的价值观念层进行渗透;依靠交互对话的产品形态对意识形态的话语方式产生影响;利用多维应用的功能属性对社会生活实践领域展开强势介入,促使当下意识形态斗争态势风云诡谲,变化万千。理性审视和精准识别ChatGPT等生成式人工智能所诱发的意识形态风险是防范生成式人工智能意识形态风险的关键。从意识形态引领角度出发,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的运行机制深蕴的资本逻辑解构社会成员已形成的认知和价值,借由"技术-资本"双重优势导致意识形态面临引领乏力风险;从意识形态话语维度审视,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能带来的"人机协同"话语生产新模式削弱主流意识形态话语深度,多元的生成式话语输送淡化话语权威,导致意识形态话语减蚀风险;从意识形态管理层面反思,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能引发的信息传播新范式消解意识形态管理的主导权,及其对人的强化宰制,导致意识形态管理弱化风险。ChatGPT等生成式人工智能在掌握先进技术基础上诱发了一系列辐射广泛、渗透全面、不易掌控的意识形态风险。如何防范与化解ChatGPT等生成式人工智能所带来的意识形态风险,成为当前我国意识形态建设无法回避的新课题。首先,贯彻落实人民至上的价值理念,以马克思主义理论指导意识形态防范工作,推进打造人机和谐、风清气正的网络空间;其次,打造富有中国特色的话语途径,在讲好中国故事的话语基础上破解西方话语的现代困境;最后,积极倡导全球治理并贡献中国方案,以共商共建共享的发展原则,依托人类命运共同体构建负责任的人工智能格局,促使ChatGPT等生成式人工智能在现代文明面前彰显光明的未来前景。

    Abstract:

    Ideological risk prevention is a key area related to national rejuvenation, national sovereignty and cultural construction. Today, as artificial intelligence technology is booming, generative AI technology represented by ChatGPT has been penetrated into the society. And with the expansion of the depth and scope of its interactions, it has wrapped up with many ideological risks with new characteristics. The prerequisite of preventing the ideological risk of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, is to clearly identify its internal mechanism. It makes an infiltration into people's ideological value by virtue of its primary function, which is generating contents. It affects the discourse of people's ideology by virtue of a form of interaction and dialogue with them. It strongly gets involve in people's practices and their social life by virtue of the function of multi-dimensional application, eventually it has led to the current ideological struggle to be extremely controversial and ever-changing. The key to prevent the ideological risk of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, is to take rational examination and precise identification on it. From the perspective of ideological leader, the capital logic embedded in its operation mechanism deconstructs the cognition and values already formed by members of the society, and leads to the risk of ineffective ideological leadership due to the dual advantages of "technology-capital". From the perspective of ideological discourse, it provides a new discourse mode of "human-machine collaboration", which weakens the depth of mainstream ideological discourse. And its multiple generative discourse delivery has abated the authority of discourse, resulting in the risk of eroding ideological discourse. From the perspective of ideological management, the new paradigm of information dissemination triggered by generative AI has eliminated the dominant right of ideology management and strengthened its control over people, which brought about the risk of weakening ideological management. Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, takes technological iteration as an opportunity of the times, and on the material basis of advanced technology, it has led to a series of ideological risks with extensiveness, comprehensiveness and uncertainty. How to prevent the ideological risks brought about by ChatGPT and other generative AI has become a new topic that cannot be avoided in China's ideological construction. First, we must stick to the value of "putting the people first", regard Marxist theory as the guideline of ideological prevention, and promote the building of a cyberspace with human-machine harmony and clean air. Second, we need to build a discourse channel with Chinese characteristics, and break the modern dilemma of Western discourse on the basis of discourse of telling a good Chinese story. Lastly, we need to actively advocate for global governance and contribute to China's solutions. We must uphold the principle of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits, rely on the carrier of a community with a shared future for mankind, and build a responsible landscape of artificial intelligence. By doing so, generative AI is prompted to show its bright future in the face of modern civilization.

    参考文献
    [1] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯.作为"意识形态"的技术与科学[M].李黎, 郭官义, 译.上海:学林出版社, 1999:69.
    [2] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社, 2022:28.
    [3] 王少.ChatGPT介入思想政治教育的技术线路、安全风险及防范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023(2):153-160.
    [4] 邹开亮, 刘祖兵.ChatGPT的伦理风险与中国因应制度安排[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023(4):74-84.
    [5] 王延川, 赵靖.生成式人工智能诱发意识形态风险的逻辑机理及其应对策略[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(4):1-7.
    [6] 高奇琦, 严文锋.知识革命还是教育异化?ChatGPT与教育的未来[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(5):102-112, 2.
    [7] 张夏恒.ChatGPT的政治社会动能、风险及防范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023(3):5-12.
    [8] 李舟, 易华勇.ChatGPT介入意识形态安全治理的逻辑、风险及应对[J].阅江学刊, 2023(4):67-74, 171-172.
    [9] 张华平, 李林翰, 李春锦.ChatGPT中文性能测评与风险应对[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2023(3):16-25.
    [10] 俞吾金.意识形态论[M].北京:人民出版社, 2009:2.
    [11] 张生.ChatGPT:褶子、词典、逻辑与意识形态功能[J].传媒观察, 2023(3):42-47.
    [12] 新华社.习近平在中共中央政治局第九次集体学习时强调加强领导做好规划明确任务夯实基础推动我国新一代人工智能健康发展[J].党建, 2018(11):1, 19.
    [13] 马克思, 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 2012:404.
    [14] 美国的霸权霸道霸凌及其危害[N]. 人民日报, 2023-02-21(17).
    [15] 侯惠勤.意识形态的变革与话语权——再论马克思主义在当代的话语权[J].马克思主义研究, 2006(1):45-51.
    [16] 李超民, 陆慧.意识形态"三权"的知识谱系、协同功能与实现方法[J].广西社会科学, 2019(2):38-43.
    [17] 马克思, 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第19卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 1972:483.
    [18] 钟祥铭, 方兴东, 顾烨烨.ChatGPT的治理挑战与对策研究——智能传播的"科林格里奇困境"与突破路径[J].传媒观察, 2023(3):25-35.
    [19] 马克思, 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷), 北京:人民出版社, 1972:42.
    [20] 爱因斯坦.爱因斯坦文集[M].许良英, 译.北京:商务印书馆, 1973:73.
    [21] 中共中央党史和文献研究院.十九大以来重要文献选编(中)[M].北京:中央文献出版社, 2021:654.
    [22] 依法规范和引导我国资本健康发展发挥资本作为重要生产要素的积极作用[N].人民日报, 2022-05-01(02).
    [23] 朱继东.科学理解坚持马克思主义在意识形态领域指导地位的根本制度[J].马克思主义研究, 2020(10):117-125.
    [24] 习近平.在省部级主要领导干部学习贯彻党的十八届五中全会精神专题研讨班上的讲话[M].北京:人民出版社, 2016:24-25.
    [25] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社, 2017:33.
    [26] 马克思, 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 2009:46.
    [27] 列宁.列宁全集(第6卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 2012:327.
    [28] 习近平.加快建设科技强国实现高水平科技自立自强[J].求知, 2022(5):4-9.
    [29] 高奇琦.马克思主义视域下的人工智能与未来治理之道[J].政治学研究, 2021(3):78-88, 162.
    [30] 张东冬.人类命运共同体理念下的全球人工智能治理:现实困局与中国方案[J].社会主义研究, 2021(6):164-172.
    [31] 王洋, 闫海.生成式人工智能的风险迭代与规制革新——以ChatGPT为例[J].理论月刊, 2023(6):14-24.
    [32] 马克思, 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第40卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 1982:289.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

代金平,覃杨杨. ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的意识形态风险及其应对[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(5):101-110. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2023.08.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2277
  • 下载次数: 1652
  • HTML阅读次数: 1691
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24
文章二维码