数字资产视角下货币法律概念的界定
作者:
中图分类号:

D922.281

基金项目:

司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目"利益衡量视角下数字人民币的个人信息保护研究"(22SFB5049)


The definition of the legal concept of money: From the perspective of digital assets
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以比特币为代表的数字资产是否属于货币,决定了其是否受到货币支付相关公私法律的约束。数字资产不依赖于法定货币体系、不限定使用范围、具备较强的去中心化特征,其更具独立的货币功能对货币概念界定带来了更大挑战。在既有法律仅规定人民币是法定货币以及"货币形式""货币性资产"外延的情况下,我国径行认定数字资产不是货币,未能遵循"相同业务、相同风险、相同监管"的原则,因而难以保护当事人的支付预期以及推进数字支付的进一步创新。基于国家与市场在货币流通中的定位不清、不同法律部门存在立法目的差异等因素,经济学与社会学中的货币理论难以直接用于界定货币法律概念,而法学界创造的准货币论和货币认同论在适用范围、前置条件等方面亦存在诸多局限。现代货币支付体系已形成以法定货币作为基础、以法定货币计价的支付手段多样化发展,以及不以法定货币计价的支付手段共存的分层特征。货币分层体系本质是国家与市场、公共与私人的混合体,国家处于该体系的顶端,而法定货币则成为信用程度最高的货币类型。在该分层体系下,货币法律概念不具有同一性,更不能仅限于法定货币,而应将货币的法律内涵确定为用于清偿货币债务的,可以被普遍接受的"支付系统要素",以区分于投资工具、货币载体及仅少数人或小区域内认可的支付手段。其中,可参考反垄断法中的相关市场和市场份额的理论内容,从子服务市场、使用权限、可替代的另一货币认定被普遍接受的市场范围,并通过币值稳定机制和接受货币的商家数量认定普遍接受的程度。另外,货币的法律外延包括在宪法与中央银行法中具有法定偿付效力的法定货币,以及在支付服务法、反洗钱法中具有支付监管效力,或在财产保护、行政费用征缴法律中具有货币财产效力的其他支付手段。其中,随着数字资产和法定数字货币的兴起,货币分层体系的构成更为丰富,具有支付监管效力和货币财产效力的货币数量将愈发增多。

    Abstract:

    Whether digital assets represented by Bitcoin are monies determines whether they are constrained by public and private laws related to monetary payment. Digital assets do not depend on the fiat money system, do not limit scope of using, and have strong nature of decentralization, which bring greater challenges to the definition of the concept of money. In the case that the existing law only stipulates that Renminbi is the legal tender, and only provides the extension of money for "monetary form" and "monetary asset", China's regulatory stance that digital assets are not monies fails to follow the principle of same business, same risk and same supervision, so it is difficult to protect the payment expectation of the parties and promote further innovation in digital payment. Based on the unclear positioning of the country and the market in the monetary circulation as well as the purposes differences among different legal branches, it is not suitable for the monetary theories in economics and sociology to directly define the legal concept of money. Besides, the quasi-monetary theory and the monetary identity theory created by legal scholars also have many limitations in the preconditions and the scope of application. The modern monetary payment system has formed the stratified characteristics of fiat money, payment means denominated in fiat money, as well as payment means not denominated in fiat money. The monetary stratification system is essentially a mixture of state and market as well as public and private, with the state at the top of the system and fiat money as the most creditworthy type of money. Under that system, the legal concept of money is not identical, nor can it be limited to fiat money. Instead, the legal connotation of money should be defined as "element of payment system" which is used to pay off monetary debts and can be generally accepted. This connotation may distinguish money from investment instrument, monetary medium, and means of payment that are accepted by only a few people or within a small area. More specifically, referring to the relevant market and market share theories under the anti-monopoly law, the generally accepted market range can be identified from sub-service market, using accessibility, another money which may be replaced, while the generally accepted degree can be identified through the stabilization mechanism of monetary value and the number of merchants accepting the money. On the other hand, the legal denotation of money includes fiat money which has the legal tender effect under the Constitution and the central bank law, and other means of payment which has the effect of payment supervision under the payment service law and anti-money laundering law, or has the effect of monetary property under the law of collection of administrative expenses as well as property protection. More specifically, with the rise of digital assets and central bank digital currencies, the composition of the monetary stratification system is richer, and the number of monies with the effect of payment supervision and monetary property will increase.

    参考文献
    [1] BOSSU W, ITATANI M, MARGULIS C, et al.Legal aspects of central bank digital currency:Central bank and monetary law considerations[J].IMF Working Paper, 2020, 254(1):1-51.
    [2] CHUNG J J.Money as simulacrum:The legal nature and reality of money[J].Hastings Business Law Journal, 2009, 5(1):109-167.
    [3] 埃里克·杰克逊.支付战争:互联网金融创世纪[M].徐彬, 王晓, 译.北京:中信出版社, 2015:24.
    [4] CPMI.Digital currencies[R].Basel:Bank for International Settlements, 2015:4.
    [5] 阿尔文德·纳拉亚南, 约什·贝努, 爱德华·费, 等.区块链:技术驱动金融数字货币与智能合约技术[M].林华, 王勇, 译.北京:中信出版社, 2016:38-39.
    [6] FSB.FSB statement on international regulation and supervision of crypto-asset activities[R].Basel:Financial Stability Board, 2022:1.
    [7] AWREYD, ZWIETEN K V.The shadow payment system[J].Journal of Corporation Law, 2018, 43(4):775-816.
    [8] HOFMANN C.The changing concept of money:A threat to the monetary system or an opportunity for the financial sector?[J].European Business Organization Law Review, 2020, 21(1):37-68.
    [9] 威廉·斯坦利·杰文斯.货币与交换机制[M].佟宪国, 译.北京:商务印书馆, 2017:13.
    [10] GLEESON S.The legal concept of money[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2018:2.
    [11] 齐爱民, 张哲.论数字货币的概念与法律性质[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2021(2):80-92.
    [12] MELLOR M.The future of money:From financial crisis to public resource[M].London:Pluto Press, 2010:14.
    [13] 杨延超.论数字货币的法律属性[J].中国社会科学, 2020(1):84-106, 206.
    [14] 赵磊.论比特币的法律属性:从HashFast管理人诉Marc Lowe案谈起[J].法学, 2018(4):150-161.
    [15] 本杰明.J.科恩.货币地理学[M].代先强, 译.成都:西南财经大学出版社, 2004:5.
    [16] 吴丙新.论法律概念:一个司法中心主义的立场[J].甘肃政法学院学报, 2006(2):69-74.
    [17] 杨铜铜.论不确定法律概念的体系解释:以"北雁云依案"为素材[J].法学, 2018(6):125-138.
    [18] MEHRLING P.The inherent hierarchy of money[C]//TAYLOR L, REZAI A, MICHL T.Social fairness and economics:Economic essays in the spirit ofDuncan Foley.New York:Routledge, 2013:394-404.
    [19] WERNER R A.Can banks individually create money out of nothing?-The theories and the empirical evidence[J].International Review of Financial Analysis, 2014, 36(1):1-19.
    [20] BELL S.The role of the state and the hierarchy of money[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2001, 25(2):149-163.
    [21] MCLEAY M, RADIA A, THOMAS R.Money creation in the modern economy[J].Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 2014:14-27.
    [22] PISTOR K.The legal theory of finance[J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 2013, 41(2):315-330.
    [23] 尼克·巴蒂亚.货币金字塔:从黄金、美元到比特币和央行数字货币[M].孟庆江, 译.北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2021:178.
    [24] FCA.Guidance on cryptoassets[R].London:Financial Conduct Authority, 2019:21.
    [25] CPSS.General guidance for national payment system development[R].Basel:Bank for International Settlements, 2006:2.
    [26] CPMI, IOSCO.Application of the principles for financial market infrastructures to stablecoin arrangements[R].Basel:Bank for International Settlements, 2022:16.
    [27] 郑彧.论数字货币的信用传承与形态变革[J].财经法学, 2020(5):149-160.
    [28] HOU L, SHEN W.Digital currency and regulatory responses:A tale of two alternative money models[J].Banking & Finance Law Review, 2021, 37(2):305-338.
    [29] 仲春.互联网第三方支付相关市场界定研究[J].中国物价, 2015(12):17-20.
    [30] AVGOULEAS E, BLAIR W.The concept of money in the 4th industrial revolution:A legal and economic analysis[J].Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, 2020(1):4-34.
    [31] 龙雯.论反垄断法市场份额的计算方法[J].价格理论与实践, 2015(12):37-39.
    [32] 查理斯·普罗克特.曼恩论货币法律问题[M].郭华春, 译.北京:法律出版社, 2015:46.
    [33] ARNOLD S.The Euro in German (private) law:Monetary obligations and the mutual dependence of public and private law[C]//FREITAGR, OMLOR S.The Euro as legal tender.Berlin:De Gruyter, 2020:154.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

柯达.数字资产视角下货币法律概念的界定[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(5):226-239. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2023.06.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:449
  • 下载次数: 697
  • HTML阅读次数: 626
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24
文章二维码