数字金融与农户内部收入差距——基于CFPS数据的实证研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F49;F323.6;F323.8

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"虚拟集聚背景下服务乡村振兴的金融包容体系重构研究"(20BJY117) ;国家留学基金委全额资助项目(202007045045)


Digital finance and the income gap of rural residents: Empirical evidence from CFPS data
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    数字金融打破了传统物理网点的局限,提升了金融服务的可得性,从而直接或间接减缓了农村贫困,然而其对农户内部收入差距究竟有何具体影响?文章基于2018年中国家庭追踪调查数据CFPS,运用再中心化影响函数回归(RIF)方法,从收入结构性角度细化剖析数字金融对农户内部收入差距的作用机制及贡献。研究表明:数字金融发展对农户收入存在显著的减贫增收效应,且能够拉大农户内部收入差距;从收入结构性分析,数字金融发展能促进经济增长带动非农就业增加,但农户存在教育程度和社会关系网差异,从而导致农户工资性收入差距呈现拉大趋势;数字金融发展在一定程度上缓解了信贷约束对农户农业和非农业生产的资金投入限制,但由于存在"使用差异",农户内部经营性收入差距拉大;数字金融通过拓宽金融产品和理财的渠道,虽弥补了"二重排斥"中的"工具排斥",但由于农户"自我排斥"依然存在,导致财产性收入进一步拉大;异质性分析表明,在高物质资本、高社会资本或高人力资本农户群体中,数字金融拉大农户内部收入差距的效果更为显著。基于上述结论,提出以下政策建议:第一,应主动关注农村基础教育水平,扩大农村受教育的人口基数,提高数字金融知识宣传的广度与深度。第二,鼓励引导传统金融机构开发数字信息平台,进行数字化转型,做大做强线上业务渠道。第三,借鉴格莱珉银行等新型业务模式,对数字金融在农村地区发展不完善的业务项目进行补充。文章可为实践部门动态把握数字金融发展状况、加强数字乡村效能、强化农户金融素养、创新金融产品与渠道以促进乡村振兴提供经验参考。

    Abstract:

    Digital finance breaks the bottleneck of limited traditional brick and mortar outlets and improves the availability of financial services, thereby directly or indirectly alleviating rural poverty. What impact does it have on the income gap of rural residents is a meaningful theme. Based on the 2018 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) data, the authors use the Recentered Influence Function Regression (RIF)method to study the impact and mechanism of digital finance on the income gap among rural households from the perspective of income structure. The study shows that digital finance has a significant effect on reducing poverty and increasing income for rural residents, and can widen the income gap within them. Specifically, the development of digital finance can increase rural residents’ salary by increasing their employment, but due to differences in education level and social network, the salary gap among rural residents is showing a widening trend. the development of digital finance directly eases credit constraints and promotes the breadth of financial coverage, thereby improving the operating income and property income of rural residents, however, due to the existence of "practical differences" and "self-exclusion", the operating income gap and property income gap is showing a widening trend. Furthermore, through the analysis of heterogeneity of capital, it is found that effects of intensifying internal income gap among high-physical capital owners, high-social capital owners are significant, which is further verified our hypotheses. Based on the above conclusions, the following suggestions are proposed: firstly, we should actively pay attention to the level of elementary education in rural areas, expand the population base receiving education in rural areas, and improve the breadth and depth of digital finance knowledge promotion. Second, relevant departments should guide traditional financial institutions to develop digital information platforms, carry out digital transformation, and expand and strengthen online business channels. Thirdly, relevant departments should draw on new business models such as the Grameen Bank to supplement the imperfect development of digital finance in rural areas. This paper suggests dynamically monitoring the development of digital finance, strengthening digital rural performance, improving rural residents’ financial literacy, encouraging financial products innovation and channels diversification for rural vitalization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田霖,张仕杰.数字金融与农户内部收入差距——基于CFPS数据的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(6):36-51. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.05.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码