“一带一路”国内国际研究的文献计量对比分析与政策建议
作者:
中图分类号:

F125

基金项目:

重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科类项目 "'一带一路’背景下内陆城市物流业绿色发展研究"(2020CDJSK03XK13);国家社会科学基金项目"新发展格局下城乡生鲜冷链物流高质量发展机制与路径研究"(21BGL127)


Comparative analysis of the domestic and international study of “The Belt and Road”: A bibliometric analysis
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [62]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    “一带一路”是我国根据国内外形势统筹两个大局作出的重要发展倡议,旨在鼓励全球价值链的延伸,促进区域经济发展。自2013年提出以来,就受到了国内外学者的广泛关注,产生了内容丰富、见解独到的学术成果。文章对比分析了"一带一路"国内国际研究在发文量、合作网络、研究内容、研究趋势等方面的差异,以期为该领域的研究提供全面的文献计量分析,并由此提出相关政策建议。为此,分别从CNKI数据库和WoS核心合集获取2013年10月1日至2020年10月31日期间国内及国际"一带一路"研究论文数据。为保证高质量的可视化结果,排除了会议摘要、报纸及书评等不相关的文献,对最终符合纳入标准文献数据的15 916篇CNKI研究文献和1 265篇Web of Science核心合集文献用CiteSpace软件进行合作网络分析和关键词共现网络分析。研究发现,在作者合作网络中,国内研究的作者合作关系较弱,主要围绕中国与沿线国家之间的合作关系展开研究;国际研究的作者之间合作关系稍强,主要围绕海上丝绸之路的港口运输网络、中国国内外发展局势等方面展开研究。在机构合作网络中,国内和国际的研究机构都具有较多的合作关系。其中,国内发文量居前四的机构分别为中国社会科学院、中国人民大学、吉林大学和北京大学;国际发文量居前四的机构分别为中国科学院、中国科学院大学、浙江大学和新加坡国立大学。在国家合作网络中,中国、俄罗斯、韩国和加拿大最早关注"一带一路"研究;发文量较多的国家分别是中国、美国、俄罗斯、英国等;与其他国家合作次数最多的国家分别是瑞士、意大利、斯里兰卡和澳大利亚。在研究范围方面,2015年该主题的关键词开始涉及各个研究领域,如 "贸易便利化""区域经济""地缘政治"等;随着时间的推移,关键词还涉及"全球治理""文化产业""能源消耗"等;相对来说国内研究范围更为广泛,涉及"人类命运共同体""对外开放""文化传播"等方面。在研究趋势方面,国内突变性关键词主要与区域经济研究相关,目前国内较关注的研究内容为农产品贸易和人才培养;国际研究的突变性关键词主要与世界经济以及全球治理相关。

    Abstract:

    The "Belt and Road" is an important development initiative made by Chinese government, coordinating the domestic and international situation, aiming at encouraging the extension of global value chains and promoting regional economic development. Since its introduction in 2013, it has attracted the attention of domestic and foreign scholars and has produced rich and insightful academic results. In this paper, we compare and analyze the differences between domestic and international researches on the "Belt and Road" in terms of publication number, cooperation network, research content and trends. This article aims to provide academics and practitioners with a bibliometric overview of the "Belt and Road" field. To ensure high quality visualization results, irrelevant papers such as conference abstracts, newspaper and book reviews were excluded. And finally, 15916 research literatures derived from CNKI and 1265 articles from Web of Science Core Collection, published from October 1st, 2013 to October 31st, 2020 were analyzed by the CiteSpace with regards to cooperation network and keyword co-occurrence network. The findings of this paper are as the followings. 1) In the author cooperation network, the domestic authors have a weak cooperation relationship, and mainly focused on the cooperation relationship between China and the countries along the "Belt and Road"; the oversea authors have a slightly stronger cooperation relationship with each other, and mainly focused on the port transportation network of the Maritime Silk Road and the development situation of China at home and abroad. 2) In the institutional cooperation network, both domestic and international research institutions have more cooperative relationships. The top four domestic institutions of publication number are Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Renmin University of China, Jilin University and Peking University; and the top four international institutions of publication number are Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang University and National University of Singapore. 3) In the national cooperation network, China, Russia, South Korea and Canada are the countries with the earliest attention to the "Belt and Road" research; the countries with higher publications are China, USA, Russia, the United Kingdom, etc.; Switzerland, Italy, Sri Lanka and Australia are the most frequent cooperation with other countries. 4) In terms of research scope, the key words of the topic in 2015 began to cover various research areas, involving "trade facilitation", "regional economy", "geopolitics", etc. As time goes by, the keywords also cover "global governance", "cultural industries", "energy consumption", etc. Relatively speaking, the scope of domestic research is broader, involving "a community with a shared future for mankind", "opening up", "cultural communication", etc. 5) In terms of research trends, domestic keywords are mainly related to regional economic research, and the current domestic research is more concerned with agricultural trade and talent cultivation; and the keywords of international studies are mainly related to the world economy and global governance.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘卫东."一带一路"倡议的科学内涵与科学问题[J].地理科学进展,2015(5):538-544.
    [2] 卢锋,李昕,李双双,等.为什么是中国:"一带一路"的经济逻辑[J].国际经济评论,2015(3):9-34,4.
    [3] 党建伟.丝绸之路经济带建设对沿线重要节点城市未来发展的影响[J].大陆桥视野,2014(5):49-51.
    [4] 李智超,严海兵."一带一路"沿线国家的政策参与:基于61个国家的定性比较分析[J].国际论坛,2020(5):3-24,155.
    [5] 刘卫东,宋周莺,刘志高,等."一带一路"建设研究进展[J].地理学报,2018(4):620-636.
    [6] 刘光阳,邓大松,梁小江.国内"一带一路"研究综述:基于定量和图谱分析[J].云南社会科学,2017(1):11-18.
    [7] 和燕杰."一带一路"国际经济合作研究进展:国内文献综述及其引申[J].云南行政学院学报,2020(4):170-176.
    [8] ZHANG S.China’s approach in drafting the investor-state arbitration clause:A review from the 'Belt and Road’ regions’ perspective[J]. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law,2017,5(1):79-109.
    [9] BELOV A.Belt andRoad initiative:A literature review[J].Asia and Africa Today,2019(6):12-18.
    [10] LEE P T W,HU Z H,LEE S J,et al.Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport[J].Maritime Policy & Management,2018,45(3):282-300.
    [11] ZHANG D W,WU L L, HUANG S Q,et al.Ecology and environment of the Belt and Road under global climate change:A systematic review of spatial patterns, cost efficiency, and ecological footprints[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,131:108237.
    [12] BASHIR M F,MA B J,QIN Y F,et al.Evaluation of One Belt One Road publications:A bibliometric and literature review analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28(28):37016-37030.
    [13] ELLEGAARD O,WALLIN J A.The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production:How great is the impact?[J]. Scientometrics,2015,105(3):1809-1831.
    [14] ZHANG X,ZHANG W,LEE P T W.Importance rankings of nodes in the China Railway Express network under the Belt and Road Initiative[J].Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2020,139:134-147.
    [15] LEE P T W,LEE S W,HU Z H,et al.Promoting Korean international trade in the East Sea Economic Rim in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative[J].Journal of Korea Trade,2018,22(3):212-227.
    [16] HU Z H,LIU C J,LEE P T W.China’s global investment and maritime flows in the context of the Belt and Road initiative[J].Journal of Contemporary China,2021,30(129): 465-480.
    [17] WANG C,LIM M K,ZHANG X Y,et al.Railway and road infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: Estimating the impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth[J].Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2020,134:288-307.
    [18] HU Z H, LIU C J, LEE P T W.Analyzing interactions between Japanese Ports and the Maritime Silk Road based on complex networks[J].Complexity,2020,2020:1-18.
    [19] SHIBASAKI R,TANABE S,KATO H,et al.Could gwadar port in Pakistan be a new gateway?A network simulation approach in the context of the Belt and Road initiative[J].Sustainability,2019,11(20):5757.
    [20] KIM H J,LAM J S L,LEE P T W.Analysis of liner shipping networks and transshipment flows of potential hub ports in sub-Saharan Africa[J].Transport Policy,2018,69:193-206.
    [21] RUAN X,BANDARA Y M,LEE J Y,et al.Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative in the Indian subcontinent under future port development scenarios[J].Maritime Policy & Management,2019,46(8):905-919.
    [22] WON L S,KAMONCHANOK S,AHMAD A,et al.Key factors in developing transit trade corridors in Northeast Asia[J].Journal of Korea Trade,2017,21(3):191-207.
    [23] CHEN J H,FEI Y J,LEE P T W,et al.Overseas port investment policy for China’s central and local governments in the Belt and Road initiative[J].Journal of Contemporary China,2019,28(116):196-215.
    [24] MIKHEEV V,LUKONIN S,IGNAT’EV S.China:Congress factor and trump factor[J].World Economy and International Relations,2017,61:23-32.
    [25] MIKHEEV V V,LUKONIN S A.China:New development trends in 2015-2016[J].World Economy and International Relations,2016,60(6):24-34.
    [26] MIKHEEV V V,LUKONIN S A,JEH S H.China:Personal power regime and new five-year plan[J].World Economy and International Relations,2016,60(10):5-16.
    [27] MIKHEEV V,LUKONIN S,JEH S.Multivariance:Xi Jinping’ big strategic answer[J].World Economy and International Relations,2015,59(12):5-14.
    [28] MIKHEEV V,LUKONIN S.China after Boao-2015[J].World Economy and International Relations,2015(8): 61-70.
    [29] WANG C,WOOD J,WANG Y J,et al. CO2 emission in transportation sector across 51 countries along the Belt and Road from 2000 to 2014[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,266:122000.
    [30] WANG C, WOOD J,GENG X R,et al.Transportation CO2 emission decoupling:Empirical evidence from countries along the Belt and Road[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,263:121450.
    [31] WANG C,CHU W L,KIM C Y.The impact of logistics infrastructure development in China on the promotion of Sino-Korea trade:The case of inland port under the Belt and Road Initiative[J].Journal of Korea Trade,2020,24(2): 68-82.
    [32] 王娟,陈世超,王林丽,等.基于CiteSpace的教育大数据研究热点与趋势分析[J].现代教育技术,2016(2):5-13.
    [33] 张雷宝,何宏龙.改革开放40年来我国财政变革研究的文献综述:基于Citespace可视化知识图谱分析[J].财经论丛,2019(9):32-41.
    [34] 李琬,孙斌栋.西方经济地理学的知识结构与研究热点:基于CiteSpace的图谱量化研究[J].经济地理,2014(4):7-12,45.
    [35] 徐建中,王名扬.文献影响力的综合评价指标体系研究[J].情报理论与实践,2014(5):69-72,56.
    [36] SUMMERS T.China’s 'New Silk Roads’:Sub-national regions and networks of global political economy[J].Third World Quarterly,2016,37(9):1628-1643.
    [37] JONES L,ZENG J H.Understanding China’s 'Belt and Road Initiative’:Beyond 'grand strategy’ to a state transformation analysis[J].Third World Quarterly,2019,40(8):1415-1439.
    [38] BLANCHARD J M F,FLINT C.The geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative[J].Geopolitics,2017,22(2):223-245.
    [39] OAKES T.The Belt and Road as method:Geopolitics,technopolitics and power through an infrastructure lens[J].Asia Pacific Viewpoint,2021,62(3):281-285.
    [40] LEE S O,WAINWRIGHT J,GLASSMAN J.Geopolitical economy and the production of territory:The case of US–China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia[J].Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space,2018,50(2):416-436.
    [41] 李曦辉,弋生辉,黄基鑫."一带一路"倡议推动构建人类命运共同体的效用评价[J].区域经济评论,2022(1):69-81.
    [42] 李晓,李俊久."一带一路"与中国地缘政治经济战略的重构[J].世界经济与政治,2015(10):30-59,156-157.
    [43] 科林·弗林特,张晓通."一带一路"与地缘政治理论创新[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2016(3):1-24.
    [44] 张帆,余淼杰,俞建拖."一带一路"与人民币国际化的未来[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2017(9):28-45.
    [45] 程贵,李杰.新发展格局下人民币国际化的空间布局研究:以"一带一路"沿线国家为例[J].金融经济学研究,2021(2):52-66.
    [46] 范兆斌,黄淑娟.文化距离对"一带一路"国家文化产品贸易效率影响的随机前沿分析[J].南开经济研究,2017(4):125-140.
    [47] 田广,刘瑜.论"一带一路"国际贸易争端仲裁机制:基于跨文化视角的探析[J].青海民族研究,2021(4):104-112.
    [48] 杨英,刘彩霞."一带一路"背景下对外直接投资与中国产业升级的关系[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):93-101,191.
    [49] YU H.Motivation behind China’s "One Belt, One Road" Initiatives and establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank[J].Journal of Contemporary China,2017,26(105):353-368.
    [50] 戴翔,王如雪."一带一路"倡议与对外直接投资:"五通"作用机制分析[J].财经研究,2022(4):79-93.
    [51] LIU Y Y,HAO Y.The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along "the Belt and Road"[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,645:674-683.
    [52] TRACY E F,SHVARTS E,SIMONOV E,et al.China’s new Eurasian ambitions:The environmental risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt[J].Eurasian Geography and Economics,2017,58(1):56-88.
    [53] SAUD S,CHEN S S,HASEEB A,et al.The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,250:119518.
    [54] 孟凡鑫,苏美蓉,胡元超,等.中国及"一带一路"沿线典型国家贸易隐含碳转移研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019(4):18-26.
    [55] 刘培东,吴志成.人类命运共同体研究的发展进路与思考:基于CiteSpace知识图谱的可视化计量分析[J].教学与研究,2022(1):70-81.
    [56] 胡黎明,郭文君,赵瑞霞.中国主导"一带一路"区域产业链整合创新研究:基于技术标准与产业转移双轮驱动的视角[J].科学管理研究,2021(6):162-170.
    [57] 蔡尚伟,车南林."一带一路"上的文化产业挑战及对中国文化产业发展的建议[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016(4):158-162.
    [58] LIU Z K,XIN L.Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity? Evidence from primary provinces along the route[J].Energy Policy,2019,129:360-369.
    [59] LI J,WEN J X,JIANG B.Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure in Chinese New Silk Road Economic Belt[J].International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy,2017,6:1-8.
    [60] 刘江会,唐瑶琦,王强,等."一带一路"沿线城市网络连通性及国内关键节点城市的影响力[J].江西财经大学学报,2020(2):3-14.
    [61] 丁如曦,赵磊,李东坤."一带一路" 沿线城市网络的联结及其集聚性影响因素研究:基于生产性服务业跨国公司联系的视角[J].国际经贸探索,2021(11):37-51.
    [62] 武娟,王文佳."一带一路" 沿线省份经济高质量发展统计监测与评价[J].统计与决策,2022(7):67-71.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陶凤鸣,杨佳,张柳柳.“一带一路”国内国际研究的文献计量对比分析与政策建议[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(6):85-99. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.04.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:182
  • 下载次数: 614
  • HTML阅读次数: 459
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-17
文章二维码