主权区块链:政府数据开放的创新治理模式
作者:
中图分类号:

D63

基金项目:

上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题"上海智慧城市建设中自动化决策的风险与问责研究"(2020EFX007)


Sovereign blockchain: An innovative governance model of government data opening
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [49]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    现行政府数据开放的"集中—分布"模式既存在过度中心化的痼疾,又难以保障数据分布的整体效果。在数据集中的过程中,多节点数据难以汇聚至中心节点;在数据分布的过程中,中心节点数据难以传递至多节点;在数据利用的过程中,多节点与中心节点之间难以互动。鉴于此,需转变现行政府数据开放的模式,并为其寻求一种新的技术支撑。区块链是破解政府数据开放难题的理想技术,可以通过通信、存储、安全、共识等四层机制保障数据流通,克服单点故障和科层组织局限,并促使政府转变职能、赋能多元主体参与数据开放。但将单一区块链技术应用于政府数据开放时仍面临着规避监管、固化错误、破解算法和再中心化的危险,存在去中心化、安全性与可扩展性不可兼得的问题。面对政府数据开放的技术需求与区块链技术的三元悖论,本文通过引入主权区块链概念来探寻能够兼顾中心化的主权国家监管与去中心化的区块链技术的政府数据开放路径。主权区块链与政府数据开放存在契合之处,其本质是一种科技与制度叠加的、具有分布式整合功能的治理技术。依托于主权区块链,可以建构一个政府引导、节点共治的政府数据开放模式。具体而言,主权区块链由公有链、联盟链、私有链共同塑造而成,该构造有助于克服单一区块链技术的三元悖论。据此,在政府数据开放中,可以根据不同的数据类型、应用场景选择合适的区块链,通过搭建社会公众的公有链平台、推进协同机构的联盟链治理、筑牢职能部门的私有链隔离来塑造一个"以链治链"的主权区块链。在基于主权区块链的政府数据开放中,具有分布和开放特征的公有链有助于底层数据的互通与联盟链的接入。联盟链既可以通过将参与节点限定在有限范围内以构建政府部门间的数据共享平台,又能够通过嵌入公有链建立起"法链",将区块链置于主权框架下以保障国家监管。公有链上的数据将受到联盟链检验,其中敏感数据将保留在私有链上,其他数据则由公有链向外传输。私有链则用于为被分流的敏感数据提供安全的存储环境。

    Abstract:

    The current concentration-distribution model of government data opening not only has the chronic disease of over centralization, but also is difficult to ensure the overall effect of data distribution. In the process of data concentration, the data of multiple nodes is difficult to converge to the central node. In the process of data distribution, the data of central node is difficult to transfer to multiple nodes; In the process of data utilization, multiple nodes are difficult to interact with the central node. In view of this, it is necessary to change the current model of government data opening and seek a new technical support for it. Blockchain is an ideal technology to solve the problem of government data opening. Through four kinds of mechanisms including communication, storage, security, consensus, blockchain can ensure data flow, overcome single point of failure and bureaucratic organization limitations as well as promote the government to change its functions and enable multiple subjects to participate in data opening. However, when the single blockchain technology is applied to the opening of government data, it is still in danger of circumventing supervision, solidifying errors, cracking algorithms and re-centralization. There are problems that decentralization, security and scalability cannot be realized at the same time. Facing the technical demand of government data opening and the ternary paradox of blockchain technology, this paper introduces the concept of sovereign blockchain to explore the path of government data opening that can realize the compatibility of centralized sovereign state supervision and decentralized blockchain technology. There is a connection between sovereign blockchain and government data opening. Sovereign blockchain is a governance technology which can integrate institution and technology as well as has the function of distributing and concentrating. Relying on sovereign blockchain, we can build a government data opening model with government guidance and joint governance of nodes. Specifically, sovereign blockchain is composed of public blockchain, consortium blockchain and private blockchain. This structure helps to overcome the ternary paradox of single blockchain technology. Therefore, in the process of government data opening, we can choose appropriate blockchains according to different data types and application scenarios, and then create a sovereign blockchain of chain governance by building a public blockchain platform for the public, promoting the consortium blockchain governance of collaborative institutions, and strengthening the private blockchain isolation of functional departments. In government data opening based on sovereign blockchain, the public blockchain with distributed and open characteristics is conducive to the sharing of underlying data and the access of the consortium blockchain. The consortium blockchain can not only build a data sharing platform between government departments by limiting the participating nodes to a limited range, but also establish a legal chain by embedding the public blockchain, and place the blockchain under the sovereignty framework to ensure national supervision. The data on the public blockchain will be tested by the consortium blockchain, in which sensitive data will be retained on the private blockchain, and other data will be transmitted to the public from the public blockchain. The private blockchain is used to provide a secure storage environment for the diverted sensitive data.

    参考文献
    [1] 李海敏.我国政府数据的法律属性与开放之道[J].行政法学研究,2020(6):144-160.
    [2] ALZAMIL Z S,VASARHELYI M A.A new model for effective and efficient open government data[J].International Journal of Disclosure and Governance,2019,16(4):174-187.
    [3] 陈尚龙.论政府数据开放的理论基础[J].理论与改革,2016(6):104-107.
    [4] 沈亚平,许博雅."大数据"时代政府数据开放制度建设路径研究[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(5):111-118.
    [5] 岳丽欣,刘文云.我国政府数据开放平台建设现状及平台框架构建研究[J].图书馆,2017(2):81-85,107.
    [6] 杨瑞仙,毛春蕾,左泽.我国政府数据开放平台建设现状与发展对策研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016(6):27-31.
    [7] 郑磊,高丰.中国开放政府数据平台研究:框架、现状与建议[J].电子政务,2015(7):8-16.
    [8] 吴旻.开放数据在英、美政府中的应用及启示[J].图书与情报,2012(1):127-130.
    [9] ABDUGAFFAROVICH A A,ABBASOVICH V A,BAKHTIYAROVICH N N.E-government,open data,and security:Overcoming information security issues with open data[J].Computer Science and Information Technology,2015,3(4):133-137.
    [10] 余奕昊,李卫东.我国地方政府数据开放平台现状、问题及优化策略:基于10个地方政府数据开放平台的研究[J].电子政务,2018(10):99-114.
    [11] 潘祥辉.去科层化:互联网在中国政治传播中的功能再考察[J].浙江社会科学,2011(1):36-43,156.
    [12] ATZORI M.Blockchain technology and decentralized governance:Is the state still necessary?[J].Journal of Governance and Regulation,2017,6(1):45-62.
    [13] FAN L J,GIL-GARCIA J R,SONG Y,et al.Sharing big data using blockchain technologies in local governments:Some technical,organizational and policy considerations[J].Information Polity,2019,24(4):419-435.
    [14] 黄如花,王春迎.我国政府数据开放平台现状调查与分析[J].情报理论与实践,2016(7):50-55.
    [15] Van PELT R,JANSEN S,BAARS D,et al.Defining blockchain governance:A framework for analysis and comparison[J].Information Systems Management,2021,38(1):21-41..
    [16] 何蒲,于戈,张岩峰,等.区块链技术与应用前瞻综述[J].计算机科学,2017(4):1-7,15.
    [17] 韩璇,袁勇,王飞跃.区块链安全问题:研究现状与展望[J].自动化学报,2019(1):206-225.
    [18] 程啸.区块链技术视野下的数据权属问题[J].现代法学,2020(2):121-132.
    [19] 石超.区块链技术的信任制造及其应用的治理逻辑[J].东方法学,2020(1):108-122.
    [20] 大数据战略重点实验室.块数据3.0:秩序互联网与主权区块链[M].北京:中信出版社,2017.
    [21] 武岳,李军祥.区块链P2P网络协议演进过程[J].计算机应用研究,2019(10):2881-2886,2929.
    [22] 蔡晓晴,邓尧,张亮,等.区块链原理及其核心技术[J].计算机学报,2021(1):84-131.
    [23] 袁勇,倪晓春,曾帅,等.区块链共识算法的发展现状与展望[J].自动化学报,2018(11):2011-2022.
    [24] 徐琳,袁光.区块链:大数据时代破解政府治理数字难题之有效工具[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2020(2):67-78.
    [25] 邵奇峰,金澈清,张召,等.区块链技术:架构及进展[J].计算机学报,2018(5):969-988.
    [26] 魏松杰,吕伟龙,李莎莎.区块链公链应用的典型安全问题综述[J].软件学报,2022(1):324-355.
    [27] 郑戈.区块链与未来法治[J].东方法学,2018(3):75-86.
    [28] KIVIAT T I.Beyond bitcoin:Issues in regulating blockchain transactions[J].Duke Law Journal,2015,65(3):569-608.
    [29] KSHETRI N.Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy[J].Telecommunications Policy,2017,41(10):1027-1038.
    [30] 劳伦斯·莱斯格.代码2.0:网络空间中的法律[M].修订版.李旭,沈伟伟,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2018.
    [31] 孙琳,邓天奇.区块链赋能数字出版:逻辑耦合、技术应用及风险审视[J].数字图书馆论坛,2022(12):54-60.
    [32] 张宪,蒋钰钊,闫莺.区块链隐私技术综述[J].信息安全研究,2017(11):981-989.
    [33] 曹雪莲,张建辉,刘波.区块链安全、隐私与性能问题研究综述[J].计算机集成制造系统,2021(7):2078-2094.
    [34] 黄运康.从代码到法律:区块链平台数字竞争规则的建构[J/OL].重庆大学学报(社会科学版):1-14.[2023-10-09].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.C.20220309.1022.002.html.Doi:10.11835/j.issn.1008-831.fx.2022.03.002.
    [35] CLAVIN J,DUAN S S, ZHANG H B, et al.Blockchains for government:Use cases and challenges[J].Digital Government:Research and Practice,2020,1(3):1-21.
    [36] 许荻迪.自治与他律:平台二重性视角下的区块链治理[J].改革,2020(8):68-82.
    [37] 刘炼箴,杨东.区块链嵌入政府管理方式变革研究[J].行政管理改革,2020(4):37-46.
    [38] 贵阳市人民政府新闻办公室.贵阳区块链发展和应用[EB/OL].(2017-02-17)[2023-10-09].https://www.sohu.com/a/126543390_353595.
    [39] 连玉明.主权区块链1.0:秩序互联网与人类命运共同体[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
    [40] 连玉明.主权区块链2.0:改变未来世界的新力量[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2022.
    [41] 连玉明.主权区块链3.0:共享秩序下的全球治理重构[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2023.
    [42] 高奇琦.主权区块链与全球区块链研究[J].世界经济与政治,2020(10):50-71,157-158.
    [43] 季卫东.主权的嬗变:数字化"魔兽世界"与法律秩序创新[J].交大法学,2023(5):5-17.
    [44] 匡梅.跨境数据法律规制的主权壁垒与对策[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(2):96-105.
    [45] TSHERING G,GAO S.Understanding security in the government’s use of blockchain technology with value focused thinking approach[J].Journal of Enterprise Information Management,2020,33(3):519-540.
    [46] 杨杨,杨加裕.构建基于主权区块链的税收信用体系研究[J].税收经济研究,2019(6):60-68.
    [47] 凯文·沃巴赫.链之以法:区块链值得信任吗?[M].林少伟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2019:81-82.
    [48] 洪学海,汪洋,廖方宇.区块链安全监管技术研究综述[J].中国科学基金,2020(1):18-24.
    [49] 袁煜明,王蕊,孟岩,等.区块链产业应用100例[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2021:85.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

匡梅.主权区块链:政府数据开放的创新治理模式[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(6):205-219. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2022.05.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:286
  • 下载次数: 464
  • HTML阅读次数: 559
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-17
文章二维码