建构中国自主法学知识体系下的法学论文选题趋向
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D920;G312

基金项目:

全国高校文科学报研究会2021年度编辑学研究基金资助课题(YB2021006)


The trend of selecting topics in legal papers under the construction of China’s self-independent knowledge system of legal science
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    构建中国自主法学知识体系,是构建涵盖中国法学各学科门类的,突出中国学术自主性、原创性、实践性的法学知识体系。这是国家对哲学社会科学研究的总要求,也是学者在当下学术研究中应有的担当和期待。作为法学学术共同体的重要组成部分,无论是法学期刊还是综合性期刊中的法学栏目,都应当为建构中国自主法学知识体系贡献自己的力量。而编发具备自主性、原创性、实践性的法学成果,更是学术期刊的工作使命。在建构中国自主法学知识体系的趋势和要求下,法学论文选题之重要性不言而喻,确定前沿的、原创的、有思想突破的选题,是一篇优秀法学论文开始写作的第一步。法学论文的选题在新时代下的研究要求,要从原来的引介性、全面性、概括性选题,向自主性、原创性、实践性的选题转变,向问题意识突出、研究目的鲜明的选题转变。即不仅要求研究选题要不断强化问题导向,形成问题意识,更对问题意识中研究"问题"的方向和内容把握提出了新的目标,这既是法学学术研究的基本出发点,也是学术期刊评判法学论文优劣的重要标准。期刊在设置栏目时,应尽量引导法学研究成果向该目标流入,形成研究合力。科学的研究方法给予法学研究新的视角和选题方向;法学研究方法的多元性推动了法学论文选题的新转变;而适当的标题设计会使法学论文的选题内容清晰而准确呈现。在确定文章标题时,有二类标题需要谨慎对待,即对"同质化"标题要严格择选;对"自说自话"和过度"装饰"的标题要进行学术判断。因此,法学研究如何面对中国问题,提炼中国问题,解决中国问题,是时代赋予法学研究的新要求,也是法学界与期刊界的重要使命。这促使法学论文的选题以此为研究方向和基本要求,需要对研究方法进行深度开发,推动法学学术界与期刊界以对学术研究高度的责任感去践行这一目标。

    Abstract:

    The construction of China’s self-independent knowledge system of legal science is to build a legal knowledge system that covers all disciplines of Chinese legal science and highlights Chinese academic autonomy, originality and practicality. This is the general requirement of China for the research of philosophy and social sciences, and it is also the responsibility and expectation of scholars in the current academic research. As an important part of the legal academic community, no matter the law column of comprehensive journals or professional legal journals, they should contribute to the construction of China’s self-independent knowledge system of legal science. It is the mission of academic journals to compile and publish original, independent and practical legal achievements. The importance of the topic of law paper is self-evident, under the trend and requirement of constructing China’s independent legal knowledge system. To determine the cutting-edge, original and breakthrough topic is the first step for an excellent law paper to write. In the new era, the research requirements of the topic selection of law papers should be changed from the original introduction, comprehensiveness and generality to the independent, original and realistic topic selection, to the prominent problem consciousness and clear research purpose. It not only requires that the research topic should constantly strengthen the issue orientation and form the issue consciousness, but also puts forward new requirements for the grasp of the direction and content of the research issues in the issue consciousness, which is the basic starting point of legal academic research, and an important standard for journals to judge the quality of legal papers. When editors set columns in the journal, they should try their best to guide the legal research achievements to flow into this goal and form research forces. The scientific research method gives legal research a new perspective and topic selection direction, and the pluralism of legal research method promotes the new change of topic selection of legal papers. And the appropriate title design will make the content of the topic of the law paper clear and accurate. When determining the title of an article, two kinds of titles need to be treated with caution: the homogenized title should be strictly selected; academic judgment is required for titles that are self-explanatory and overly decorative. Therefore, how to face the Chinese problem, refine the Chinese problem and solve the Chinese problem are new requirements of the times, and they are also important missions of the law circle and the periodical circle. This requires that the topic selection of legal papers should take these as research direction and basic requirements, and the research methods should be deeply developed. The legal academia and the periodical circle should practice this goal with a high sense of responsibility in academic research.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李佳欣.建构中国自主法学知识体系下的法学论文选题趋向[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(6):272-283. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2023.10.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码