慈善捐赠与公司财务绩效:基于动态变化与区域差异视角
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目"互联网时代企业的财务行为与治理特征"(71632006);国家自然科学基金面上项目"激励机制、人力资本与公司价值"(72072107);江西省教育厅科学技术青年项目"房地产价格、人力成本粘性与生产技术进步"(GJJ2200540);上海财经大学浙江学院院级一般课题"经济政策不确定性下企业ESG实践"


Charitable donation and company’s financial performance: A study from the perspective of dynamic change and regional difference
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    慈善捐赠作为收入“第三次分配”实现共同富裕的重要渠道,也作为树立“企业公民”良好形象的重要途径,是否惠人惠己?现有关于慈善捐赠与企业财务绩效关系的研究尚未形成一致结论,由于变量度量指标、理论推演假说不同而不同。文章选取2006—2020年中国沪深两市A股所有上市公司为观测对象,对企业慈善捐赠金额动态变化如何影响其财务绩效进行了系统性分层次的检验。研究发现,捐赠金额动态变化是导致“慈善捐赠—财务绩效”关系不一的原因,企业持续增加捐赠能够实现社会福利和自身业绩的“双赢”,在一定程度上支持了“价值利器假说”。具体而言,企业捐赠金额增加和持续捐赠能够显著提升其财务绩效,且上期捐赠而本期继续增加捐赠,财务绩效提升效应更大;企业捐赠金额减少和持续不捐将显著降低其财务绩效,且上期捐赠而本期捐赠直接减少至零,财务绩效降低效应更大。从区域经济视角分析发现,与东部地区或者经济水平发展较高的地区相比,慈善捐赠动态变化对财务绩效的影响在西部地区或者经济发展水平较低的地区较弱甚至不相关。从广告营销角度分析发现,能够树立企业形象的广告营销与树立企业公民形象的慈善捐赠之间不存在替代关系,广告营销可以增强捐赠增加和持续捐赠带来的财务绩效提升效应,但也会恶化持续不捐对财务绩效的降低效应。从产权性质来看,无论是国有企业还是非国有企业,捐赠增加都能促进财务绩效提升,持续捐赠对财务绩效的提升效应在国有企业中更加显著,而捐赠减少或持续不捐对财务绩效的降低效应在国有企业中得到有效抑制。此外,建立逐步回归模型进行中介效应检验,分析表明,大客户关系是慈善捐赠变化影响企业财务绩效的一个渠道,说明慈善捐赠能够通过增强企业与大客户关系从而促进绩效提升。最后,文章采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)缓解样本选择内生性问题,结论依然成立。文章的主要贡献在于,丰富了慈善捐赠与财务绩效的关系研究,为企业制定慈善捐赠策略提供指导意义,为国有企业履行社会责任提供经验支持。

    Abstract:

    As an important channel to achieve common prosperity through "the third distribution" of earnings, and an important way to be a good "corporate citizen", does charitable donation benefit others and itself? The relevant literatures that study the relationship between donation and financial performance have not reached a consensus, the different variable measurement and different theory hypothesis maybe the reason for the different results. This paper takes A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2006 to 2020 as observations, and tests how the dynamic change with the amount of charitable donation affects the financial performance of enterprises systematically in different levels. The empirical results indicate that, the dynamic change of corporate donation is the reason for the inconsistent relationship between charitable donation and financial performance, and constantly increasing donations by enterprises can achieve a "win-win" situation for both social welfare and their own financial performance. That means the conclusion supports the "shareholder value hypothesis" in some extent. To be more specific, on the one hand, both increase in donation and continuous donation can significantly improve the financial performance of the company, and there is a greater effect on the improvement of financial performance when the company donates more in the current period than the last period in which it donates too. On the other hand, both decrease in donation and continuous non-donation will significantly reduce the financial performance of the company, and there is a greater effect on the reduction of financial performance when the company directly reduce the donation to zero in the current period but has donated in the last period. From the perspective of regional economy, it is found that compared with the eastern region or the regions with higher level of economic development, there is weaker or even irrelevant relationship between the dynamic change of charitable donation and the financial performance of the company in the western region or the regions with lower level of economic development. From the perspective of advertising, it reveals that advertising cannot replace the charitable donation, which means corporate image established by the advertising is different from the image of corporate citizen established by the charitable donation. Advertising can enhance the effects on the improvement of financial performance especially when the company increases the charitable donation or sustain to donate, but it will worsen the effects on the reduction of financial performance when the company continued to do no charitable donations. From different types of property rights, it finds that whether the enterprise is state-owned enterprise (SOE) or not, increasing the charitable donation can improve its financial performance. Continuous donation strengthens the positive effect of charitable donation on financial performance in SOEs. The negative effect of decrease in donation and continuous non-donation can be restrained in SOEs. That means there is a good moderating effect for the property right on the relationship between charitable donation and financial performance. Furthermore, a stepwise regression model is established to test the mediating effect, it shows that the relationship with key customers is a channel through which changes in charitable donation affect the financial performance, indicating that increase in donation can improve the financial performance through enhancing the relationship with key customers. At last, we use PSM to alleviate endogeneity problem, the conclusion is still valid. The contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in the following three aspects: Firstly, it enriches the research on the relationship between charitable donation and financial performance. Secondly, the conclusion offers guidance for the enterprises to perform charitable donation with their strategies. Thirdly, it also provides empirical evidence for the SOEs to perform more CSR in various areas under the guidance of government policies.

    参考文献
    [1] TUZZOLINO F,ARMANDI B R.A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility[J].Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1):21-28.
    [2] CARROLL A B.The pyramid of corporate social responsibility:Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders[J].Business Horizons,1991,34(4):39-48.
    [3] SMITH C.The new corporate philanthropy[J].Harvard Business Review,1994,72(3):105-116.
    [4] FOMBRUN C J,GARDBERG N A,BARNETT M L.Opportunity platforms and safety nets:Corporate citizenship and reputational risk[J].Business and Society Review,2000,105(1):85-106.
    [5] PORTER M E,KRAMER M R.The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy[J].Harvard Business Review,2002,80(12):56-68,133.
    [6] GODFREY P C.The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth:A risk management perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2005,30(4):777-798.
    [7] 傅超,吉利.诉讼风险与公司慈善捐赠:基于"声誉保险"视角的解释[J].南开管理评论,2017(2):108-121.
    [8] FRIEDMAN M.The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[M]//Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance.Berlin,Heidelberg:Springer,2007:173-178.
    [9] 方军雄.捐赠,赢得市场掌声吗?[J].经济管理,2009(7):172-176.
    [10] BROWN W O,HELLAND E,SMITH J K.Corporate philanthropic practices[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2006,12(5):855-877.
    [11] AUPPERLE K E,CARROLL A B,HATFIELD J D.An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability[J].Academy of Management Journal,1985,28(2):446-463.
    [12] SEIFERT B,MORRIS S A,BARTKUS B R.Having,giving,and getting:Slack resources,corporate philanthropy,and firm financial performance[J].Business and Society,2004,43(2):135-161.
    [13] MULLER A,KRÄUSSL R.Do markets love misery?Stock prices and corporate philanthropic disaster response[J].Academy of Management Proceedings,2008,2008(1):1-6.
    [14] 李敬强,刘凤军.企业慈善捐赠对市场影响的实证研究:以"5·12"地震慈善捐赠为例[J].中国软科学,2010(6):160-166.
    [15] WANG H L,CHOI J,LI J T.Too little or too much?Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance[J].Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159.
    [16] 阮刚铭,魏宇方舟,官峰.慈善捐赠、社会资本与融资约束[J].会计与经济研究,2019(3):79-91.
    [17] 位豪强,赵向芳,黄超,等.卖空机制与公司慈善捐赠:基于保险功能的视角[J].会计与经济研究,2020(6):45-59.
    [18] 杜兴强,杜颖洁.公益性捐赠、会计业绩与市场绩效:基于汶川大地震的经验证据[J].当代财经,2010(2):113-122.
    [19] 涂咏梅,张楠.地区经济发展、慈善捐赠与企业绩效关系的实证检验[J].统计与决策,2019(18):173-176.
    [20] 王端旭,潘奇.企业慈善捐赠带来价值回报吗:以利益相关者满足程度为调节变量的上市公司实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(7):118-128.
    [21] 卢正文,刘春林.基于动机认知视角的慈善捐赠对企业绩效影响研究:基本企业社会责任的调节效应[J].现代经济探讨,2017(9):33-40.
    [22] 陈建英,杜勇,张欢,等.慈善捐赠对业绩异质性企业价值的影响研究:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中央财经大学学报,2019(12):63-75.
    [23] 张敏,童丽静,许浩然.社会网络与企业风险承担:基于我国上市公司的经验证据[J].管理世界,2015(11):161-175.
    [24] SHAPIRA R.Corporate philanthropy as signaling and co-optation[J].Fordham Law Review,2012,80(5):1889-1939.
    [25] 田利辉,王可第.公司慈善捐赠的"信号传递"动机:基于一项自然实验的考察[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2019(3):138-147.
    [26] 欧锦文,陈艺松,林洲钰.慈善捐赠的媒体关注与企业创新[J].外国经济与管理,2021(4):111-122.
    [27] 李四海,陈旋,宋献中.穷人的慷慨:一个战略性动机的研究[J].管理世界,2016(5):116-127,140.
    [28] 马鹏飞,隋聪.新冠疫情下的股市波动与上市公司应对:基于信号传递视角[J].会计与经济研究,2021(6):106-126.
    [29] LYS T,NAUGHTON J P,WANG C.Signaling through corporate accountability reporting[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2015,60(1):56-72.
    [30] 辛清泉,周静,胡方.上市公司虚假陈述的产品市场后果[J].会计研究,2019(3):25-31.
    [31] KLEIN B,LEFFLER K B.The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance[J].Journal of Political Economy,1981,89(4):615-641.
    [32] 汝毅,薛健,张乾.媒体新闻报道的声誉溢出效应[J].金融研究,2019(8):189-206.
    [33] 潘越,翁若宇,刘思义.私心的善意:基于台风中企业慈善捐赠行为的新证据[J].中国工业经济,2017(5):133-151.
    [34] 蒋德权,蓝梦.企业社会责任与产品市场表现[J].财经研究,2022(2):109-122.
    [35] 陈飞翔,黎开颜,刘佳.锁定效应与中国地区发展不平衡[J].管理世界,2007(12):8-17.
    [36] 潘奇,陈柳雯.市场环境、慈善捐赠与企业价值:来自中国A股上市公司的实证研究[J].当代经济管理,2015(12):11-18.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王金平,蒋德权,严苏艳.慈善捐赠与公司财务绩效:基于动态变化与区域差异视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(1):53-70. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.11.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:446
  • 下载次数: 739
  • HTML阅读次数: 804
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-15
文章二维码