中国县级领导班子群体特征研究——基于东西部比较分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

重庆社会科学规划一般项目"地方政府药品安全监管绩效评估研究"(2020YBGL84);重庆大学中央高校学院科技创新专项项目"公民宪法意识与社会稳定辩证关系研究"(106112016CDJXY010008)


Research on group characteristics of county-level leading groups in China: Based on the comparative study in the East and West China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    面对东西部发展存在的巨大差距,西部地区必须全面提升发展质量,而这离不开作为地区发展“领头羊”的领导班子的引领和推动。现有文献对于领导干部群体特征以及配置结构进行了深入的归纳和探讨,但也有必要比较区域间领导干部整体水平的差异并分析其潜在原因,据此对症下药。比较东西部领导班子的群体特征,对于西部地区领导干部的培养、选拔有一定参考价值。论文运用高层梯队理论,采用分层抽样的方法,在广东省、天津市、陕西省、重庆市获得562名县级党政领导班子的履历信息,从人口统计学特征、教育背景、职业发展经历三个维度进行分析,对比研究东西部地区县级党政领导班子群体特征的共性和差异。本研究利用EXCEL对县级领导班子特征各个指标的变量进行统计分析,通过均值、标准差等数据展示变量的分布结构和特征;利用SPSS21.0对东西部县级领导班子的差异性特征进行分组,通过t检验、卡方检验等呈现数据间的差异性。研究表明,东西部党政领导班子在性别、民族、政治面貌、教育背景等方面呈现出相似的特征,但在籍贯来源、年龄、任职经历、晋升路径等方面呈现出显著差异,西部地区县级领导班子年龄分布呈现“两头多,中间少”、籍贯结构“本地多,外地少”、教育背景“偏人文,轻理工”、“任职经历单一,工作经验同质性高”、自下而上晋升比例更低等明显特征。针对分析结果,建议西部县级党政领导班子要着重加强领导班子协同效能建设、优化领导班子干部队伍结构、完善现代干部任用选拔机制,以及进一步强化领导干部的交流制度。

    Abstract:

    Facing the development gap between the East and the West of China, the western region must comprehensively improve the quality of development, which cannot be separated from the leading group's guidance and promotion. While existing literature has extensively explored and discussed the characteristics and configuration structure of leading cadres, it is also crucial to compare disparities in overall competence among leading cadres across different regions and analyze their underlying causes, so as to identify appropriate remedies. Comparing the group characteristics of the leading groups in the East and the West has certain reference value for the cultivation and selection of leading cadres of the western region. Based on the high-level echelon theory, this paper adopts the stratified sampling method by taking leading cadres of the Party and government at county level of Guangdong, Tianjin, Shanxi, and Chongqing as research object. Based on the resumes of 562 leaders, it compares and analyzes commonness and differences of group characteristics of the Party and government leading groups in the East and West China from demographic characteristics dimension, educational background dimension, and career development experience dimension. In this study, EXCEL is used to make statistical analysis on the variables of each indicator of the characteristics of county-level leaders, and the distribution structure and characteristics of the variables are displayed through data such as standard deviation and mean value. SPSS21.0 software is utilized to examine differences between county-level leading groups in eastern and western regions through t-tests and chi-square tests. The findings reveal that while gender, ethnicity, political outlooks, educational backgrounds exhibit similar patterns among leading groups in both east and west; notable disparities exist with regard to native place distribution, age composition, employment experience, and career advancement paths. Specifically, age distribution of county-level leading groups in west regions demonstrates an evident pattern characterized by "more at younger and older ages but fewer at middle ages", whereas native place structures indicate a reference for local candidates over non-locals. Moreover, humanities-based educational backgrounds are more prevalent than technical ones. Additionally, the employment experience tends to be relatively homogeneous with limited diversity. Furthermore, the proportion of bottom-up promotion is lower. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, it is suggested that the construction of the western leading groups should focus on strengthening the construction of coordination efficiency of the leading group, optimizing the structure of the leading group cadres, improving the modern cadre appointment and selection mechanism, and intensifying the exchange system of the leading cadres.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘丽霞,薛红杰.中国县级领导班子群体特征研究——基于东西部比较分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,(1):283-296. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. zs.2020.08.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码