中国县级领导班子群体特征研究——基于东西部比较分析
作者:
基金项目:

重庆社会科学规划一般项目"地方政府药品安全监管绩效评估研究"(2020YBGL84);重庆大学中央高校学院科技创新专项项目"公民宪法意识与社会稳定辩证关系研究"(106112016CDJXY010008)


Research on group characteristics of county-level leading groups in China: Based on the comparative study in the East and West China
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [41]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    面对东西部发展存在的巨大差距,西部地区必须全面提升发展质量,而这离不开作为地区发展“领头羊”的领导班子的引领和推动。现有文献对于领导干部群体特征以及配置结构进行了深入的归纳和探讨,但也有必要比较区域间领导干部整体水平的差异并分析其潜在原因,据此对症下药。比较东西部领导班子的群体特征,对于西部地区领导干部的培养、选拔有一定参考价值。论文运用高层梯队理论,采用分层抽样的方法,在广东省、天津市、陕西省、重庆市获得562名县级党政领导班子的履历信息,从人口统计学特征、教育背景、职业发展经历三个维度进行分析,对比研究东西部地区县级党政领导班子群体特征的共性和差异。本研究利用EXCEL对县级领导班子特征各个指标的变量进行统计分析,通过均值、标准差等数据展示变量的分布结构和特征;利用SPSS21.0对东西部县级领导班子的差异性特征进行分组,通过t检验、卡方检验等呈现数据间的差异性。研究表明,东西部党政领导班子在性别、民族、政治面貌、教育背景等方面呈现出相似的特征,但在籍贯来源、年龄、任职经历、晋升路径等方面呈现出显著差异,西部地区县级领导班子年龄分布呈现“两头多,中间少”、籍贯结构“本地多,外地少”、教育背景“偏人文,轻理工”、“任职经历单一,工作经验同质性高”、自下而上晋升比例更低等明显特征。针对分析结果,建议西部县级党政领导班子要着重加强领导班子协同效能建设、优化领导班子干部队伍结构、完善现代干部任用选拔机制,以及进一步强化领导干部的交流制度。

    Abstract:

    Facing the development gap between the East and the West of China, the western region must comprehensively improve the quality of development, which cannot be separated from the leading group's guidance and promotion. While existing literature has extensively explored and discussed the characteristics and configuration structure of leading cadres, it is also crucial to compare disparities in overall competence among leading cadres across different regions and analyze their underlying causes, so as to identify appropriate remedies. Comparing the group characteristics of the leading groups in the East and the West has certain reference value for the cultivation and selection of leading cadres of the western region. Based on the high-level echelon theory, this paper adopts the stratified sampling method by taking leading cadres of the Party and government at county level of Guangdong, Tianjin, Shanxi, and Chongqing as research object. Based on the resumes of 562 leaders, it compares and analyzes commonness and differences of group characteristics of the Party and government leading groups in the East and West China from demographic characteristics dimension, educational background dimension, and career development experience dimension. In this study, EXCEL is used to make statistical analysis on the variables of each indicator of the characteristics of county-level leaders, and the distribution structure and characteristics of the variables are displayed through data such as standard deviation and mean value. SPSS21.0 software is utilized to examine differences between county-level leading groups in eastern and western regions through t-tests and chi-square tests. The findings reveal that while gender, ethnicity, political outlooks, educational backgrounds exhibit similar patterns among leading groups in both east and west; notable disparities exist with regard to native place distribution, age composition, employment experience, and career advancement paths. Specifically, age distribution of county-level leading groups in west regions demonstrates an evident pattern characterized by "more at younger and older ages but fewer at middle ages", whereas native place structures indicate a reference for local candidates over non-locals. Moreover, humanities-based educational backgrounds are more prevalent than technical ones. Additionally, the employment experience tends to be relatively homogeneous with limited diversity. Furthermore, the proportion of bottom-up promotion is lower. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, it is suggested that the construction of the western leading groups should focus on strengthening the construction of coordination efficiency of the leading group, optimizing the structure of the leading group cadres, improving the modern cadre appointment and selection mechanism, and intensifying the exchange system of the leading cadres.

    参考文献
    [1] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[N].人民日报,2017-10-28(01).
    [2] 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定(2019年10月31日中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议通过)[N].人民日报,2019-11-06(01).
    [3] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N].人民日报,2022-10-26(01).
    [4] 人民网.习近平在庆祝改革开放40周年大会上的讲话[EB/OL].(2018-12-18).http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2018/1219/c64094-30474974.html.
    [5] 新华社.习近平主持中共中央政治局会议决定召开十九届五中全会分析研究当前经济形势和经济工作[EB/OL]. (2020-07-30)[2020-08-02].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-07/30/content_5531313.htm.
    [6] 邓纯东.锻造适应新时代发展需要的领导班子[J].人民论坛,2019(36):60-63.
    [7] 王贤彬,徐现祥.官员能力与经济发展:来自省级官员个体效应的证据[J].南方经济,2014(6):1-24.
    [8] 沈念祖.东部官员西进:交流调动官员要注重连续性[J].决策探索(上半月),2012(4):52-53.
    [9] 萧鸣政,史洪阳.新时代党政领导干部培养与开发机制研究:以省部级领导干部为例[J].中共中央党校学报,2018(5):100-107.
    [10] HAMBRICK D C, MSAON P A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
    [11] EISENHARDT, K.M,SCHOONHOVEN, C B. Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(3):504-529.
    [12] FARRELL, K A, HERSCH, P L. Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2005, 11(1/2):85-106.
    [13] LUNDSTRUM L L. Corporate investment myopia: a horserace of the theories[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2002, 8(4): 353-371.
    [14] BESTRAND M,MEHTA P,MULLAINATHAN S. Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(1): 121-148.
    [15] 张尔升,胡国柳.地方官员的个人特征与区域产业结构高级化:基于中国省委书记、省长的分析视角[J].中国软科学,2013(6):71-83,61.
    [16] 杜兴强,曾泉,吴洁雯.官员历练、经济增长与政治擢升:基于1978~2008年中国省级官员的经验证据[J].金融研究,2012(2):30-47.
    [17] 徐现祥,李书娟.官员偏爱籍贯地的机制研究:基于资源转移的视角[J].经济研究,2019(7):111-126.
    [18] 陈绍俭,冯宗宪,殷永昆.官员来源、本地信息与地区经济增长:基于地级市数据的新证据[J].南方经济,2019(1):120-136.
    [19] 王贤彬,徐现祥.地方官员来源、去向、任期与经济增长:来自中国省长省委书记的证据[J].管理世界,2008(3):16-26.
    [20] 祁凡骅,卢湘枚.地级市市长任用规律:从"十五大"到"十九大":基于GDP百强市市长相关数据的研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(5):69-75,189.
    [21] 周卓华.我国地方领导干部成长路径研究[J].重庆社会科学,2019(8):96-105.
    [22] 马秀玲,闫虹.女性党政一把手成长路径研究:以地市级为例[J].中国行政管理,2013(8):76-79.
    [23] 袁国友.农村基层领导干部成长的轨迹与特点:基于云南县级干部情况的调查与分析[J].学术探索,2013(12):41-45.
    [24] 李超显.乡镇政府领导班子及成员综合考评指标的建构与筛选[J].湖湘论坛,2009(1):80-82.
    [25] 王丛漫,王丽辉,李建峰.构建科学的县级领导班子和领导干部绩效考核指标体系:以邢台市为例[J].河北经贸大学学报,2010(2):91-96.
    [26] 萧鸣政,赵源.领导班子配置模型及其优化策略研究[J].中国行政管理,2013(8):67-71.
    [27] 叶亚芝.关于党政领导班子结构的实证研究[J].陕西行政学院学报,2013(2):45-48.
    [28] 余绪鹏,朱林.改革开放以来党政干部学历特征变化分析:以近六届中央委员为观察视角[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2018(4):9-15.
    [29] 王卓.党政领导干部队伍的结构性缺陷探析[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(1):132-138.
    [30] 林蓉蓉.人力资本如何影响官员晋升:基于1990~2013年省级领导晋升过程的研究[J].政治学研究,2019(1):91-105,128.
    [31] 彼得·德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].蔡文燕,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2009:222.
    [32] 过勇,卢文超.职业经历视角下优秀地方领导干部成长规律研究:以县委书记为例[J].公共行政评论,2018(3):28-49,209-210.
    [33] 曹仰锋. 高层管理团队领导行为对团队绩效的影响机制:案例研究[J]. 管理学报, 2011(4):504-516.
    [34] 包国宪,张弘.政府绩效治理中的协同领导体系构建:超越个体层面的公共领导新发展[J].行政论坛,2020(3):97-104.
    [35] HACKMAN J R. The design of work teams[J]. Handbook of organizational behavior, 1987, 127(1): 315-342.
    [36] 罗良针,胡菁,田丹. 我国普通高等学校领导班子结构优化的实然分析[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2018(1):63-76.
    [37] 姚志文,刘峰.地方领导干部执政能力建设研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007:228.
    [38] 方振邦.高效能领导班子到底怎么建[J].人民论坛,2020(14):52-55.
    [39] 中共中央办公厅印发《2019-2023年全国党政领导班子建设规划纲要》[EB/OL] (2019-12-04)[2020-08-02].https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2019/12-04/9025054.shtml.
    [40] 李志,曹雨欣.我国西部地区柔性引才困境及路向研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022(3):14-24.
    [41] 李林威,刘帮成. 区域城市群人才生态系统评价研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1):135-150.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

潘丽霞,薛红杰.中国县级领导班子群体特征研究——基于东西部比较分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(1):283-296. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. zs.2020.08.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-15
文章二维码