二代继任方式与家族企业国际化——来自东西部家族企业的经验证据
作者:
中图分类号:

F276.5;F125;F272.91

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“家族企业代际传承对国际化的影响机制研究”(19BGL077)


Second generation succession pattern and family firm internationalization: Empirical evidence from family firms in the East and West of China
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [35]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    中国家族企业正进入代际传承高峰时期,而国际化则是家族企业获取长期竞争优势与持续成长的重要战略选择。目前学术界关于代际传承对家族企业国际化影响的文献,主要考察家族后代权力涉入对家族企业国际化的影响,忽视了二代继任方式对家族企业国际化的作用。因此,文章在将中国家族企业二代继任方式区分为渐进式继任方式和激进式继任方式的基础上,利用2020年8月至11月对重庆和浙江等东西部省(直辖市)253家家族企业的问卷调查数据,首次实证研究二代继任方式对家族企业国际化的影响,探讨代际权威、创始人政治身份和继承人年龄对二代继任方式与家族企业国际化关系的调节效应,并进一步研究国际化承诺对二代继任方式与家族企业国际化关系的遮掩效应,以揭示二代继任方式对家族企业国际化的影响机制与作用情境。研究结果表明:与激进式继任方式相比,采取渐进式继任方式的家族企业更倾向于选择深度、广泛和快速地进入国际市场;代际权威、创始人政治身份、继承人年龄会显著地削弱渐进式继任方式对家族企业国际化深度、广度和速度的促进作用,即渐进式继任方式对家族企业国际化深度、广度和速度的促进作用在代际权威大、创始人拥有政治身份、继承人年龄大的家族企业更不明显。文章使用重新定义家族企业、选择已经进入或完成代际传承的家族企业样本进行稳健性检验,上述研究结论仍然成立。进一步研究表明,国际化承诺在渐进式继任方式与家族企业国际化深度、广度之间发挥遮掩效应,即渐进式继任方式通过降低国际化承诺水平进而削弱其对家族企业国际化深度和广度的积极效应。基于上述研究结果,文章提出如下建议:家族企业创始人应提前制定传承计划,尽可能安排二代渐进式继任,在渐进式继任过程中帮助二代继承人尽快建立权威合法性,以降低两代之间的权威差异;家族企业创始人要理性认识政治关系的积极和消极作用,积极构建亲清政商关系,政府部门应着力构建更加公正公平透明的经营环境,充分调动家族企业家经营活动的积极性。

    Abstract:

    Presently, a peak of intergenerational succession has already begun in Chinese family businesses. Internationalization is a key strategy for family firms to achieve long-term competitiveness and sustainable growth. Previous literatures on the impact of intergenerational succession on family firm internationalization largely examine the effects of family next generation involvement in power on the internationalization of family firm, and ignore the influence of second generation succession patterns on the internationalization of family firms. On the basis of dividing second generation succession patterns into the evolutionary succession pattern and revolutionary succession pattern in Chinese family businesses, the authors make the initial effort to empirically examine the effect of second generation succession patterns on family firm internationalization, and explore the moderating effects of intergenerational authority, founder' political identity and successor' age in the above relationship. Furthermore, they explore the masking effect of internationalization commitment in the above relationship, so as to reveal the mechanism and context of second generation succession patterns on family firm internationalization. Drawing on the survey data of 253 family firms in the eastern and western provinces or municipalities (e.g., Chongqing, Zhejiang,) from 8 to 10 month in 2020, they find that:first, compared to the revolutionary succession pattern, family firms that adopt the evolutionary succession pattern are more likely to choose deep, extensive and rapid access to international market; second, intergenerational authority, founder' political identity and successor' age significantly weakens the positive effects of the evolutionary succession pattern on internationalization depth, breadth and speed in family firms, that is, the positive effects of the evolutionary succession pattern on internationalization depth, breadth and speed become less obvious in family firms with higher intergenerational authority, founder' political identity and older successors. The authors employ an alternative definition for family business, as well as select samples of family firms that are going or had already gone through intergenerational succession for robustness test, the above-mentioned results are still valid. Expand research shows that internationalization commitment plays a masking effect on the relationship between the evolutionary succession pattern and both internationalization depth and breadth, that is, the evolutionary succession pattern weakens its positive effects on both internationalization depth and breadth by reducing the level of international commitment in family firms. Based on the above research results, the following recommendations are put forward. Firstly, founders in family firms should make succession plans in advance, and arrange the evolutionary succession for the second generation as far as possible. In the process of evolutionary succession, founders should help the second successors to establish authority legitimacy as soon as possible to reduce the authority difference between the two generations. Secondly, founders in family firms should rationally understand the positive and negative effects of political relations, and actively build a friendly and clean relationship between government and business. Government departments should strive to build a more just, fair and transparent business environment, so as to fully mobilize the enthusiasm of family entrepreneurs in business activities.

    参考文献
    [1] 窦军生,张芯蕊,李生校,等.继承人培养模式何以影响家族企业传承绩效:继承人受认可度的中介效应[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2020(5):54-70.
    [2] ALAYO M,MASEDA A,ITURRALDE T,et al.Internationalization and entrepreneurial orientation of family SMEs:The influence of the family character[J].International Business Review,2019,28(1):48-59.
    [3] STIEG P,HIEBL M R,KRAUS S,et al.Born-again globals:Generational change and family business internationalization[J].European Journal of International Management,2017,11(5):581-605.
    [4] FANG H Q,KOTLAR J,MEMILI E,et al.The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms:Generational differences and the role of knowledge-based resources[J].Global Strategy Journal,2018,8(1):136-157.
    [5] DOU J S,JACOBY G,LI J L,et al.Family involvement and family firm internationalization:The moderating effects of board experience and geographical distance[J].Journal of International Financial Markets,Institutions and Money,2019,59:250-261.
    [6] MARIOTTI S,MARZANO R,PISCITELLO L.The role of family firms' generational heterogeneity in the entry mode choice in foreign markets[J].Journal of Business Research,2021,132:800-812.
    [7] SHI H X,GRAVES C,BARBERA F.Intergenerational succession and internationalisation strategy of family SMEs:Evidence from China[J].Long Range Planning,2019,52(4):101838.
    [8] 邹立凯,梁强,王博.基于权威转换视角的家族企业二代子女继任方式研究[J].管理学报,2019(12):1771-1780,1789.
    [9] BARACH J A,GANITSKY J B.Successful succession in family business[J].Family Business Review,1995,8(2):131-155.
    [10] OSNES G.Succession and authority:A case study of an African family business and a clan chief[J].International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,2011,11(2):185-201.
    [11] BJÖRNBERG Å,NICHOLSON N.The family climate scales-Development of a new measure for use in family business research[J].Family Business Review,2007,20(3):229-246.
    [12] LI H B,LIU P W,ZHANG J S,et al.Economic returns to communist party membership:Evidence from urban Chinese twins[J].The Economic Journal,2007,117(523):1504-1520.
    [13] WIERSEMA M F.Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms[J].Journal of Management Studies,1992,29(1):73-94.
    [14] 万希.我国家族企业接班人模式的比较和分析[J].经济经纬,2007(1):116-118.
    [15] SIEGER P,ZELLWEGER T,AQUINO K.Turning agents into psychological principals:Aligning interests of non-owners through psychological ownership[J].Journal of Management Studies,2013,50(3):361-388.
    [16] 陈灿君,许长新.家族企业差异性接任方式对创新投入的影响:基于组织认同理论[J].当代财经,2021(8):90-101.
    [17] CESINGER B,HUGHES M,MENSCHING H,et al.A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity,trust,and international market knowledge affect family firms' multinationality[J].Journal of World Business,2016,51(4):586-599.
    [18] CABRERA-SUÁREZ K,DE SAÁ-PÉREZ P,GARCÍA-ALMEIDA D.The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm[J].Family Business Review,2001,14(1):37-46.
    [19] YADAV M S,PRABHU J C,CHANDY R K.Managing the future:CEO attention and innovation outcomes[J].Journal of Marketing,2007,71(4):84-101.
    [20] FAN J P H,WONG T J,ZHANG T Y.Founder succession and accounting properties[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,2012,29(1):283-311.
    [21] 胡旭阳,吴一平.创始人政治身份与家族企业控制权的代际锁定[J].中国工业经济,2017(5):152-171.
    [22] GOMEZ-MEJIA L R,MAKRI M,KINTANA M L.Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms[J].Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(2):223-252.
    [23] RAY S,MONDAL A,RAMACHANDRAN K.How does family involvement affect a firm's internationalization?An investigation of Indian family firms[J].Global Strategy Journal,2018,8(1):73-105.
    [24] 胡旭阳,吴一平.中国家族企业政治资本代际转移研究:基于民营企业家参政议政的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2016(1):146-160
    [25] 李新春,韩剑,李炜文.传承还是另创领地:家族企业二代继承的权威合法性建构[J].管理世界,2015(6):110-124,187.
    [26] 周立新.家族企业国际化与企业绩效:家族传承意愿与政治关系的调节效应[J].管理评论,2019(9):159-168.
    [27] KAFOUROS M I,BUCKLEY P J,CLEGG J.The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises:The role of international depth and breadth[J]. Research Policy,2012,41(5):848-861.
    [28] 王益民,梁枢,赵志彬.国际化速度前沿研究述评:基于全过程视角的理论模型构建[J].外国经济与管理,2017(9):98-112.
    [29] COVIELLO N,KANO L,LIESCH P W.Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world:Macro-context and microfoundations[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2017,48(9):1151-1164.
    [30] PONGELLI C,CAROLI M G,CUCCULELLI M.Family business going abroad:The effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions[J].Small Business Economics,2016,47(3):787-801.
    [31] VAHLNE J E,JOHANSON J.From internationalization to evolution:The Uppsala model at 40 years[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2017,48(9):1087-1102.
    [32] GRAVES C,SHI H X,BARBERA F.Family-centred non-economic goals and the internationalisation of family firms:Evidence from Australia[J].International Business Review,2022,31(4):101974.
    [33] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745.
    [34] SHAMSUDDOHA A,ALI M Y.Mediated effects of export promotion programs on firm export performance[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,2006,18(2):93-110.
    [35] 袁建国,后青松,程晨.企业政治资源的诅咒效应:基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察[J].管理世界,2015(1):139-155.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

周立新,李智.二代继任方式与家族企业国际化——来自东西部家族企业的经验证据[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(2):82-97. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.09.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:253
  • 下载次数: 729
  • HTML阅读次数: 722
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-05-08
文章二维码