乡村振兴战略下乡村发展的差异化路径设计——基于发展潜力评估的案例研究
作者:
中图分类号:

D422.6;F327


Differentiated path design for rural development under rural revitalization strategy: A case study based on development potential evaluation
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [40]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    乡村振兴战略是当前我国三农工作的重要政策抓手和制度依据,也是未来促进乡村现代化发展的重要战略思想。然而,我国的区域经济社会差异和自然地理特点使得不同地区的乡村存在着较大差异,难以通过相同的具体路径实现不同乡村的同步发展,根据乡村的独特属性分类推进乡村现代化是解决当前发展难题的有效措施。分类推进乡村振兴战略需要明确区分乡村的潜力特征和分类依据。因此,构建科学的乡村潜力评价指标和分类方法具有重要意义。文章作者基于现有乡村振兴研究相关文献,梳理了当前乡村发展潜力及类型评估的研究思路与技术方法,结合实地调研,运用层次分析法构建了乡村发展潜力评价指标体系。同时基于"三类空间"框架和指标存在的分值特征,结合乡村实际情况设定了类别划分标准。进一步,通过对宁夏回族自治区泾源县随机选择的40个乡村发展潜力的评价验证了评估框架的有效性。研究发现:乡村发展潜力评价体系,包含了交通便捷性、用地适宜性水平、人口与经济规模、设施承载水平、产业规模、空间扩展水平、各类资源要素7个维度的因素,下含19个子指标;根据综合评估分数,泾源县40个案例村可划分为移民迁建型、整治优化型、集聚发展型、城镇改造型四个类别,突出了不同类别乡村发展的主要方向。基于此,文章从土地使用制度创新角度提出了乡村振兴战略制度创新的具体路径和具有探索性的政策建议,认为在通过分类推进城乡融合的过程中,应当积极推动乡村治理制度与产业发展相融合,促进乡村发展的各类要素形成集聚效应;同时推进集体经营性建设用地制度优化,有效发挥集体资产在促进乡村经济发展中的重要作用;此外还应当搭建村庄改造合作平台,通过构建公共论坛促进乡村合作治理模式的形成与发展。文章丰富了分类推进乡村振兴研究的方法运用,发展了当前乡村振兴研究中的类型学划分依据与评估方法,案例的应用有效地检验了评价方法的可靠性和科学性,同时通过评价也明晰了泾源县乡村发展潜力的整体特征和可参照的发展路径,具有较强的理论创新和实践性。

    Abstract:

    The rural revitalization strategy is an important policy focus and institutional basis for the current work related to agriculture, rural areas, and farmers in China, and also an important strategic idea for promoting rural modernization development in the future. However, the social-economic differences and natural geographical characteristics in China make it difficult to achieve synchronous development of different rural areas through the same specific path. Promoting rural modernization based on the unique attributes of rural areas is an effective measure to solve the current development challenges. The promotion of rural revitalization strategy by classification requires a clear distinction between the potential characteristics and classification basis of rural areas. Therefore, constructing scientific rural potential evaluation indicators and classification methods is of great significance. Based on existing literature on rural revitalization, the author of this article summarizes the research ideas and technical methods for evaluating the potential and types of rural development. Combined with field research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to construct an evaluation index system for rural development potential. At the same time, based on the "three types of space" framework and the scoring characteristics of indicators, classification standards have been set in combination with the actual situation of rural areas. Furthermore, the author verifies the effectiveness of the evaluation framework by evaluating the development potential of 40 villages randomly selected from Jingyuan County, Ningxia. The research finds that the evaluation system of rural development potential includes seven dimensions, including traffic convenience, land suitability level, population and economic scale, facility carrying level, industrial scale, spatial expansion level, and various resource elements, including 19 sub indicators; According to the comprehensive evaluation score, the 40 case villages in Jingyuan County can be divided into four categories: immigrant relocation type, renovation optimization type, agglomeration development type, and urban transformation type, highlighting the main direction of rural development in different categories. Based on this, the author proposes specific paths and exploratory policy suggestions for institutional innovation of rural revitalization strategy from the perspective of land use system innovation. It is believed that in the process of promoting urban-rural integration through classification, the integration of rural governance system and industrial development should be actively promoted, and various elements of rural development should form agglomeration effects. At the same time, we should promote the optimization of the system of collective operating construction land, effectively play the important role of collective assets in promoting rural economy. In addition, we should also establish a platform for village transformation cooperation, and promote the formation and development of rural cooperative governance models through the construction of public forums. This article enriches the application of classification in promoting rural revitalization research, develops the typological classification basis and evaluation methods in current rural revitalization research, and effectively tests the reliability and scientificity of the evaluation method through the application of cases. At the same time, the overall characteristics of the development potential of rural villages in Jingyuan County and the reference development path are also clarified through evaluation, which has strong theoretical innovation and practicality.

    参考文献
    [1] 王天宇.论乡村振兴战略背景下特色小镇的培育发展:基于特色小镇、中小企业与乡村振兴三者契合互动分析[J].河南社会科学,2020(7):105-111.
    [2] 寇江.乡村振兴战略中金融支持与现代农业发展关系实证[J].辽宁农业科学,2018(6):35-39.
    [3] 俞云峰,张鹰.浙江新型城镇化与乡村振兴的协同发展:基于耦合理论的实证分析[J].治理研究,2020(4):43-49.
    [4] 陈娟,马国胜.服务乡村振兴的新型职业农民产教融合定向培养实证研究[J].安徽农业科学,2018(34):232-234.
    [5] 潘梦琳.基于内生式发展模式的乡村振兴途径研究[J].中国名城,2018(4):32-39.
    [6] 张佳丽.合作社助推乡村振兴策略研究:以济源市为例[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2018.
    [7] 罗怡."乡村振兴"背景下县域村庄发展评价及建设规划分类研究[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2018:24-26.
    [8] 杨秀,余龄敏,赵秀峰,等.乡村振兴背景下的乡村发展潜力评估、分类与规划引导[J].规划师,2019(19):62-67.
    [9] LIU Y S,LI Y H.Revitalize the world’s countryside[J].Nature,2017,548(7667):275-277.
    [10] 高楠,张新成,王琳艳.中国乡村旅游公共服务水平时空格局与形成机理[J].地理科学,2021(2):252-260.
    [11] 周国华,刘畅,唐承丽,等.湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素[J].地理研究,2018(12):2475-2489.
    [12] 王扬,翟腾腾,尹登玉.乡村振兴背景下空心村土地整治潜力评价:以山东省五莲县为例[J].水土保持通报,2019(2):288-292,300.
    [13] 曲衍波,张凤荣,宋伟,等.农村居民点整理潜力综合修正与测算:以北京市平谷区为例[J].地理学报,2012(4):490-503.
    [14] 屠爽爽,龙花楼,刘永强,等.农村居民点整治潜力测算方法研究进展与展望[J].自然资源学报,2015(11):1956-1968.
    [15] 胡银根,吴欣,廖成泉,等.两湖平原区农村宅基地退出潜力测算方法研究[J].地域研究与开发,2018(2):116-120,132.
    [16] 王楠,郝晋珉,李牧,等.生计转型背景下河北省农村宅基地整理分区与潜力研究[J].农业工程学报,2019(9):255-264.
    [17] 王新越,朱文亮.鲁南贫困地区识别与乡村旅游发展潜力研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018(12):269-275.
    [18] 杨亚东,程长林,杜娅婷,等.全国县域乡村产业发展状况及其就业带动潜力评价[J].农业工程学报,2021(13):322-330.
    [19] 洪伟,刘科伟,薛旭平.西部省区城郊融合类乡村振兴潜力综合评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2021(4):735-743.
    [20] 郑兴明.基于分类推进的乡村振兴潜力评价指标体系研究:来自福建省3县市6个村庄的调查数据[J].社会科学,2019(6):36-47.
    [21] 崔树义,田杨.乡村振兴的人口视角[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):118-128.
    [22] 乡村振兴的劳动力基础:现状与变迁[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):106-117.
    [23] 何杰,金晓斌,梁鑫源,等.城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力:以苏北地区为例[J].自然资源学报,2020(8):1940-1957.
    [24] 林孝松,王莹,余情,等.奉节县村庄发展潜力评价与类型识别[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021(3):320-328.
    [25] 方帅.农村产权改革制度安排、社会联结与乡村振兴:基于山东省东平县的实证研究[J].江汉大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):66-74,124.
    [26] 孙喜红,贾乐耀,陆卫明.乡村振兴的文化发展困境及路径选择[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(5):135-144.
    [27] 刘守英,熊雪锋.我国乡村振兴战略的实施与制度供给[J].政治经济学评论,2018(4):80-96.
    [28] 汪芳,郝小斐.基于层次分析法的乡村旅游地社区参与状况评价:以北京市平谷区黄松峪乡雕窝村为例[J].旅游学刊,2008(8):52-57.
    [29] 曾维和,咸鸣霞.乡村振兴的产业共同体模式及其形成机理:基于武家嘴产业兴村的实证调研[J].中国软科学,2019(11):74-85.
    [30] 邹晓光.乡村规划思路的变革:从新农村到美丽乡村[J].乡村科技,2018(33):48-49.
    [31] 孔俊婷,杨超.乡村振兴战略背景下田园综合体发展机制构建研究[J].农业经济,2019(1):31-33.
    [32] 施维,刘振远.乡村振兴战略: 新时代"三农"工作的新旗帜和总抓手[J].湖南农业,2018(4):10-12.
    [33] 文琦,郑殿元.西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J].地理研究,2019(3):509-521.
    [34] 乔陆印.乡村振兴村庄类型识别与振兴策略研究:以山西省长子县为例[J].地理科学进展, 2019(9):1340-1348.
    [35] 矫雪梅,张雪原,孙雯,等.生态产品价值在国土空间规划中落地难点与规划应对[J].城市发展研究,2022(9):50-55.
    [36] 熊鹰,黄利华,邹芳,等.基于县域尺度乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型划分:以湖南省为例[J].经济地理,2021(6):162-170.
    [37] 史云扬,张益宾,郝晋珉.乡村振兴背景下河北省县域乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021(4):18-28.
    [38] 李燕琴.乡村振兴战略的推进路径、创新逻辑与实施要点:基于欧洲一体化乡村旅游框架的启示[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(4):63-69.
    [39] 张志胜.多元共治:乡村振兴战略视域下的农村生态环境治理创新模式[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):201-210.
    [40] 数字经济巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果与乡村振兴有效衔接:基于非线性空间效应研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1):88-105.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王锋.乡村振兴战略下乡村发展的差异化路径设计——基于发展潜力评估的案例研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(3):55-69. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2023.10.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:210
  • 下载次数: 730
  • HTML阅读次数: 499
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-07
文章二维码