建构与层累:汉末以来董奉形象变化考述
作者:
中图分类号:

I207.7;K826.2


Study on the doctor image of Dong Feng
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [63]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [3]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    董奉是一位汉魏之交长期活动于江南一带的民间巫师,在庐山归隐终老后,被后世塑造成一位道教仙人的形象,与华佗、张仲景并称"建安三神医",其标志性符号有"福山""杏林"等。然而,董奉的形象并非一直以"神医"得以彰显,而是经历了从神仙到神医的转变。自汉末以来,董奉的人物形象经历了三次建构:从葛洪《神仙传》中的道教仙人形象记载,到唐宋时期对其仙人身份的官方敕封和道教徒推广,再到元代以后逐渐由文人士大夫对其医者形象的再次书写,董奉的形象经历了民间巫祝—官封神灵—仁心良医的转变。董奉形象的第一次建构缘于早期道教争取官方与民间支持的发展策略筹划;第二次建构则缘于唐宋时期国家意志与地方传统结合下地方宗教对合法获得收益与支持的认识实践方式;第三次重构的原因主要是元明时期医者地位的提升,以及文人士大夫赞誉医者或借喻标榜自身德行的儒医结合倾向的具体表现。但在这几次形象建构中,董奉的超自然属性没有随着时间的推进而有新的神迹,而且因后人加注而屡遭失载,进而限制了董奉信仰的广泛流传。经过这三次人物形象建构后,与华佗、张仲景不同,董奉在元代之后甚至未成为十大名医配飨三皇。而民间、官方对董奉的态度,也从魏晋时期的民间崇拜,至唐宋时期官方认可并大加敕封,南宋后已变为"事迹失注",最终成为元以来文人士大夫赠答歌颂的良医标杆,并被固定下来至今日。在董奉人物形象的塑造过程中,完成了从神仙到神医的转变,体现了历史人物建构的复杂过程。

    Abstract:

    Dong Feng was born at the turn of the Han and Wei dynasties. As a folk wizard, he had been active in the Jiangnan generation for a long time and lived in seclusion in Lushan Mountain until his death. Later, he was shaped into the image of a Taoist immortal. He was also known as the "Three Miracle Doctors of Jian’an" together with Hua Tuo and Zhang Zhongjing. His iconic symbols include "Fushan" and "Xinglin". However, Dong Feng’s image has not always been shown as a magic doctor, but has experienced a transformation from a god to a magic doctor. Since the end of the Han Dynasty, Dong Feng’s character image has gone through three constructions: from the Taoist immortal image in Ge Hong’s The Legend of Immortals, to the official edict and Taoist promotion of his immortal status in the Tang and Song Dynasties, to after the Yuan Dynasty Gradually, the image of Dong Feng as a doctor was re-written by literati and doctors, and Dong Feng’s image experienced the transformation of folk sorcerer, official deity and benevolent doctor. The reason for the first construction of Dong Feng’s image lies in the planning of the development strategy of early Taoism to win official and private support. The construction of its second image was due to the way in which local religions understood and practiced legitimate gains and support under the combination of national will and local tradition during the Tang and Song Dynasties. The final reason for the third reconstruction was mainly due to the improvement of the status of doctors during the Yuan and Ming Dynasties and the concrete manifestation of the tendency of literati and doctors to combine Confucianism and medicine by praising doctors or using metaphors to flaunt their own virtues. However, in these several image constructions, Dong Feng’s supernatural attributes did not have new miracles as time went on, and they were repeatedly lost due to later generations’ additions, thus limiting the widespread spread of Dong Feng’s beliefs. After these three character image constructions, unlike Hua Tuo and Zhang Zhongjing, Dong Feng did not even become one of the top ten famous doctors who served the Three Emperors after the Yuan Dynasty. The attitude of the people and the government toward Dong Feng also changed from folk worship in the Wei and Jin Dynasties to official recognition and enshrinement in the Tang and Song Dynasties. After the Southern Song Dynasty, it changed to "lost notes" on his deeds and finally became a tribute to literati and officials since the Yuan Dynasty. The benchmark of good medicine has been fixed to this day. In the process of shaping Dong Feng’s character, he completed the transformation from immortal to miraculous doctor, reflecting the complex process of constructing historical figures.

    参考文献
    [1] 海登·怀特.元史学:19世纪欧洲的历史想象[M].陈新,译.南京:译林出版社,2013:13.
    [2] 彭刚.后现代史学理论读本[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:326.
    [3] 吴真.为神性加注:唐宋叶法善崇拜的造成史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:254.
    [4] 顾颉刚.古史辨[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1982:60.
    [5] 葛洪.神仙传校释[M].胡守为,校释.北京:中华书局,2010.
    [6] 陈寿.三国志(卷49)[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
    [7] 中国地方志集成·省志辑·福建[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2011:263.
    [8] 中国地方志集成·福建府县志(第1辑)[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2000:113.
    [9] 中国地方志集成·乡镇志专辑26[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1992:378.
    [10] 臧励龢.中国古今地名大辞典[M].上海:商务印书馆,1931:1057.
    [11] 贾思勰.齐民要术译注[M].缪启愉,缪桂龙,校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2021:288.
    [12] 全唐诗:增订本[M].北京:中华书局,1999.
    [13] 王象之.舆地纪胜:全八册[M].北京:中华书局,1992:1313.
    [14] 路漫.董奉:杏林始祖[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2017:63.
    [15] 陈琨.杏林始祖董奉[M].福州:海风出版社,2005:143.
    [16] 冯模健.建安神医董奉传奇及养生智慧[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2010:202.
    [17] 陈宗.杏林佳话:董奉[J].家庭医药 就医选药,2021(3):78-79.
    [18] 苟中金.董奉与杏林[J].中国医院管理,1985(7):50.
    [19] 钱超尘.董奉考[J].江西中医学院学报,2010(2):31-34.
    [20] 陈启夔.建安三神医之一:董奉的生平及里籍考[J].福建中医药,1983(3):38-39.
    [21] 滑红彬.庐山董奉杏林的历史与变迁[J].中国道教,2019(6):62-66.
    [22] 应劭.风俗通义校注[M].王利器,校注.北京:中华书局,1981.
    [23] 范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965:3127-3128.
    [24] 宋兆麟.巫与巫术[M].成都:四川民族出版社,1989:260-261.
    [25] 林富士.中国中古时期的宗教与医疗[M].台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司,2008.
    [26] 欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975:1504.
    [27] 陶宗仪.说郛三种[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2012:2826.
    [28] 李延寿.南史[M].北京:中华书局,1975:1905.
    [29] 汪叔子.文廷式集(上册)[M].北京:中华书局,1993:400.
    [30] 李昉.太平御览[M].北京:中华书局,1960:4150.
    [31] 房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
    [32] 李零.中国方术续考:典藏本[M].北京:中华书局,2019:59.
    [33] 林富士.巫者的世界[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2016:344-365.
    [34] 曾异.纺授堂诗文集[M].何立民,点校.北京:商务印书馆,2017:332.
    [35] 桂馥.说文解字义证[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1987:656.
    [36] 干宝.搜神记[M].马银琴,译注.北京:中华书局,1979:26.
    [37] 姚思廉.梁书[M].北京:科学出版社,1973:242-243.
    [38] 葛洪.抱朴子内篇[M].张松辉,译.北京:中华书局,2011.
    [39] 方诗铭.黄巾起义先驱与巫及原始道教的关系:兼论"黄巾"与"黄神越章"[J].历史研究,1993(3):3-13.
    [40] J.G.弗雷泽.金枝:巫术与宗教之研究[M].汪培基,徐育新,张泽石,译.北京:商务印书馆,2013:95.
    [41] 王溥.唐会要(卷49)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1960:860.
    [42] 雷闻.唐代地方祠祀的分层与运作:以生祠与城隍神为中心[J].历史研究,2004(2):27-41,189.
    [43] 龚鹏程,陈廖安.中华续道藏初辑(第1册)[M].台北:新文丰出版公司,1999.
    [44] 张继禹.中华道藏(第47册)[M].北京:华夏出版社,2004.
    [45] 董诰.全唐文[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
    [46] 陈垣.道家金石略[M].陈智超,曾庆瑛,校补.北京:文物出版社,1988:124.
    [47] 曾枣庄,刘琳.全宋文(第2册)[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006:364.
    [48] 司义祖.宋大诏令集[M].北京:中华书局,1962:647.
    [49] 罗易扉.地方、记忆与艺术:回到地方场所与往昔的历史经验[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(2):148-157,231.
    [50] 张杲.医说[M].王旭光,张宏,校注.北京:中国中医药出版社,2009:67.
    [51] 韩森.变迁之神:南宋时期的民间信仰[M].包伟民,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999:45.
    [52] 余新忠.医圣的层累造成(1065—1949年):"仲景"与现代中医知识建构系列研究之一[J].历史教学(下半月刊),2014(7):3-13.
    [53] 林慧光.杨士瀛医学全书[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2006:448.
    [54] 王新昌,唐明华.医圣张仲景与医圣祠文化(上)[M].北京:华艺出版社,1994:119.
    [55] 何良俊.四友斋丛说[M].北京:中华书局,1959:183.
    [56] 袁济喜."温柔敦厚"与华夏审美心理[J].国际儒学(中英文),2021(1):126-138.
    [57] 危亦林.世医得效方[M].2版.北京:中国中医药出版社,2009.
    [58] 四库未收书辑刊编纂委员会.四库未收书辑刊8辑(第29册)[M].北京:北京出版社,1997:23.
    [59] 张鷟.龙筋凤髓判校注[M].田涛,郭成伟,校注.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996:151.
    [60] 王衮.博济方[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959:2.
    [61] 张小星.情感诠释:儒家古典诠释学的一个传统[J].国际儒学(中英文),2024(1):58-64,185.
    [62] 叶盛.水东日记[M].北京:中华书局,1980:134.
    [63] 周仲瑛,于文明.中医古籍珍本集成(续):综合卷[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2014:175.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴志远,李孟霞,蔡杰.建构与层累:汉末以来董奉形象变化考述[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(3):180-191. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. rw.2024.05.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:176
  • 下载次数: 565
  • HTML阅读次数: 465
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-07
文章二维码