面向人与自然和谐共生的环境党内法规的治理逻辑
作者:
中图分类号:

D262.6;X321

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"建设中国特色社会主义法治体系的理论基础和实施方案"(23ZDA073)


The governance logic of environmental inner-party laws and regulations for the harmonious coexistence of man and nature
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [41]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    建设面向人与自然和谐共生的中国式现代化,中国式法治化是必然要求,其中环境法治不可或缺。中国式的环境法治必然要重视党内法规的特殊法治和治理功能。可从着力发挥党内法规在环境法治中的特殊作用、统筹推进环境综合治理的规范功能、推动构建人类环境命运共同体的制度文明三方面,揭示出环境党内法规所秉持环境系统观、环境效能观、环境文明观的政理法理。环境党内法规有广义和狭义之分,环境党内法规所承载上述治理逻辑的规范样态,不仅包括符合《中国共产党党内法规制定条例》严格形式要件的狭义党内法规,也包括引领环境法治发展的环境政策、起到监督保障等作用的党内环境规范性文件。从环境党内法规的政治功能和规范效力来讲,将以决议、决定、意见、通知等为主要载体的环境政策视为广义的环境党内法规,符合新形势下环境党内法规体系构筑的核心要义。从目前党内法规体系的构成情况看,起到监督保障作用的党内环境规范性文件成为了主力军,但其数量庞杂又单线作战的实践困境使其亟需完善以形成治理合力。因此,应进一步探讨党的环境政策和党内环境规范性文件向狭义党内法规的有机转化,使狭义的环境党内法规成为环境党内法规体系的主体部分。广义视阈下的环境党内法规,在面向人与自然和谐共生的现代化中发挥着规范、治理与重塑的制度功能。环境党内法规通过将党的不成文的环境文明提炼转化为具有约束力的制度形态,从而使其获得长远的效能力和长期的执行力。环境党内法规通过为生态文明建设提供制度赋能,从而全面发挥其环境治理的政治效能、预防效能和发展效能。环境党内法规以党的领导为本质特征的政治结构为环境文明奠基、以人民为中心的人本理念为环境文明铸魂、以党规国法共治为保障的外部制度为环境文明塑形,使其实质上具备了打造人类环境文明新形态的重塑功能。需要注意的是,完备的环境党内法规体系对上述功能的系统发挥尤为重要,因此,面向人与自然和谐共生的环境党内法规,还有待进一步体系化完善。

    Abstract:

    To build a Chinese-style modernization oriented to harmonious coexistence between man and nature,Chinese-style rule of law is an inevitable requirement,among which environmental rule of law is indispensable. The Chinese environmental rule of law must attach importance to the special rule of law and governance functions of the party’s regulations. From the three aspects of making full use of the special role of intra-party regulations in environmental rule of law,coordinating the normative function of comprehensive environmental governance,and promoting the institutional civilization of building a community with a shared future for human environment,we can reveal the political and legal principles of environmental system view,environmental efficiency view and environmental civilization view upheld by intra-party environmental regulations. Environmental inner-party regulations can be divided into broad sense and narrow sense,and environmental inner-party regulations carry the normative pattern of the above governance logic,including not only the narrow intra-Party regulations that comply with the strict formal requirements of the Regulations on the Formulation of Intra-Party Regulations,but also the environmental policies that lead the development of environmental rule of law and the intra-party environmental normative documents that play the role of supervision and guarantee. In terms of the political function and normative effectiveness of environmental inner-party regulations,the environmental policy with resolutions,decisions,opinions,notices as the main carrier is regarded as the broad environmental inner-party regulations,which is in line with the core of the construction of environmental inner-party regulations system under the new situation. From the current composition of the internal party regulation system,the internal party environmental regulatory documents that play the role of supervision and security have become the main force,but their quantity and complexity and the practical dilemma of single-line combat make them need to be improved to form a governance force. Therefore,we should further explore the organic transformation of the party’s environmental policy and environmental normative documents into the narrow internal party regulations,so that the narrow environmental internal party regulations become the main part of the environmental internal party regulations system. The environmental laws and regulations within the Party under the broad perspective play the institutional functions of regulating,governing and reshaping in the modernization of harmonious coexistence between man and nature. By transforming the Party’s unwritten environmental civilization into a binding institutional form,the environmental inner-party regulations standardize the environmental inner-party civilization,so that it can obtain long-term effectiveness and execution.By providing institutional empowerment for the construction of ecological civilization,environmental inner-party regulations give full play to their political,preventive and developmental effectiveness of environmental governance. Environmental inner-party regulations take the political structure with the leadership of the Party as the essential feature as the foundation of environmental civilization,the people-centered people-oriented concept as the soul of environmental civilization,and the external system guaranteed by the co-governance of the Party rules and the state law as the shape of environmental civilization,so that it has the reshaping function of creating a new form of human environmental civilization in essence. It should be noted that the complete environmental inner-party regulations system is particularly important for the systematic play of the above functions,therefore,the environmental inner-party regulations for the harmonious coexistence of man and nature need to be further systematized and improved.

    参考文献
    [1] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告(2022年10月16日)[M].北京:人民出版社,2022:23.
    [2] 习近平.论坚持人与自然和谐共生[M].北京:中央文献出版社2022:34.
    [3] 秦天宝.人与自然和谐共生的中国式现代化之环境法治保障[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(3):28-38.
    [4] 陈海嵩.中国环境法治中的政党、国家与社会[J].法学研究,2018(3):3-20.
    [5] 王伟国.党内法规在"党对全面依法治国的领导"中的作用论略[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2023(6):3-13.
    [6] 姜明安.论中国共产党党内法规的性质与作用[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(3):109-120.
    [7] 温泽彬,苏升.中国式法治现代化建设的双重路径[J].长白学刊,2023(5):91-99.
    [8] 陈海嵩.生态环境政党法治的生成及其规范化[J].法学,2019(5):75-87.
    [9] 中共中央宣传部,中华人民共和国生态环境部.习近平生态文明思想学习纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
    [10] 周佑勇.大变局下中国式民主的制度优势与宪法保障[J].中国法学,2023(1):46-64.
    [11] 朱军,杜群.党内法规视域下生态环境保护法律责任与政治责任的功能协同[J].理论月刊,2021(10):88-99.
    [12] 陈亮,杨攀.国家安全体系中的生态安全及其法治完善[J].西南政法大学学报,2022(5):98-112.
    [13] 中国人大网.环境保护法修订(2012年8月—2014年4月)[EB/OL].(2014-04-25).http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/huiyi/lfzt/hjbhfxzaca/node_19114.htm.
    [14] 王振民.中国共产党党内法规研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2016:12-13.
    [15] 张震,袁周斌.人与自然和谐共生的中国式现代化之法治体系与方略[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):196-208.
    [16] 编写组.党的十九大报告辅导读本[M].北京:人民出版社,2017:382.
    [17] 朱林方.党内法规若干基本范畴思辨[J].国家检察官学院学报,2021(6):85-101.
    [18] 欧爱民.中国共产党党内法规总论[M].北京:人民出版社,2019:43.
    [19] 魏治勋.党内法规特征的多元向度[J].东方法学,2021(1):128-138.
    [20] 陈海嵩.环保督察制度法治化:定位、困境及其出路[J].法学评论,2017(3):176-187.
    [21] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第三卷)[M].北京:文出版社,2020:373.
    [22] 习近平.习近平著作选读(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2023.
    [23] 中共中央党史和文献研究院.习近平关于依规治党论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2022:152.
    [24] 李林.科学定义"党内法规"概念的几个问题[J].东方法学,2017(4):107-112.
    [25] 中共中央、国务院关于加快推进生态文明建设的意见[M].北京:人民出版社,2015:3.
    [26] 刘长秋.党内法规若干重要理论问题[J].人民法治,2017(2):7-12.
    [27] 欧爱民.中国共产党党内法规总论[M].北京:人民出版社,2019.
    [28] 邓斌,伍茜.新时代党内法规与国家法律有机衔接机制建构[J].西南政法大学学报,2022(4):80-90.
    [29] 张文显.以两个总目标定位两个体系的意义及其关系[J].西南政法大学学报,2016(1):3-5.
    [30] 周佑勇.百年大党推进法治建设的基本经验与启示[J].中国党政干部论坛,2021(6):6-10.
    [31] 中共中央文献研究院.习近平关于社会主义生态文明建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社2017:146.
    [32] 刘艳红.民法典绿色原则对刑法环境犯罪认定的影响[J].中国刑事法杂志,2020(6)3-19.
    [33] 张震.宪法生态文明规范体系对环境法典纂的制度化依据:以〈立法法〉第二次修改为背景的探讨[J].法学论坛,2023(5):87-98.
    [34] 陈海嵩.生态环境保护督察规范体系及其构造探析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(5):150-161.
    [35] 张震.创造人类民主文明新形态 全过程人民民主的宪法逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2023:195.
    [36] 刘志刚,郭威.论社会主义核心价值观的立法实施及其优化[J].西南政法大学学报,2023(4):3-13.
    [37] 陈越瓯.新时代法制统一的政法逻辑[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2023(1):13-25.
    [38] 陈海嵩.国家治理视域下生态环境保护督察的制度协同[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2023(4):59-69.
    [39] 刘艳红.民刑共治:中国式现代犯罪治理新模式[J].中国法学,2022(6):27-46.
    [40] 张震.环境法典编纂的宪法根据及合宪性控制[J].东方法学,2022(3):72-84.
    [41] 中共中央宣传部、中央全面依法治国委员会办公室.习近平法治思想学习纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2021:25.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张震,刘栋阳.面向人与自然和谐共生的环境党内法规的治理逻辑[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(3):216-227. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2024.02.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:105
  • 下载次数: 357
  • HTML阅读次数: 340
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-07
文章二维码