为诗一辩:基于认识论视角下的中国现代诗歌历史观
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

I226

基金项目:


In defense of poetry: The historical view of modern Chinese poetry from the perspective of epistemology
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    西方认识论历史上发生过三次颇具影响的"为诗一辩"行动,三次行动均涉及诗歌的社会功用,也不同程度地阐释了诗歌与历史的关系。"为诗一辩"的行动并未发生在中国文学史上,主要原因在于中国古代一直存在着"史诗一家"的文化传统,诗歌与历史的关系结合十分紧密,而且诗歌在中国历史上一直有着很高的地位,无须为诗进行辩护。中国现代诗歌发展的进程十分曲折而多变,其中蕴含着现代诗歌与历史关系的探讨,中国现代诗歌与历史的关系问题在不同历史时期呈现出不同的面孔。20世纪20年代现代诗歌的发生期,郭沫若和李金发对于西方浪漫主义和象征主义诗歌的模仿分别采用了融入现代科技元素和借鉴西方深层心理机制探索的方式,拉开了中国现代诗歌认识论的帷幕。三十年代以卞之琳为代表的将西方象征主义与中国古典诗歌相结合的"化古"与"化欧"的中西比较思维将认识论进一步推进。四十年代穆旦和冯至分别从潜意识与佛家认识论,以及身体美学和深层审美心理结合方式将现代诗歌认识论推到全新高度。八十年代以来的中国现代诗歌批评已经意识到现代诗歌历史观的重要性,陈超和耿占春分别提出了"个人化-历史修辞"和"别样的写作"当代诗学批评路径,二人分别从历史和当下的角度为当代诗歌批评探索出切合实际的当代诗学历史观。如何分辨和界定现代诗歌和历史之间的关系问题已经呼之欲出,随着当代诗歌创作与诗歌评论之间的割裂状态的加深以及诗学认识论的提升,"为诗一辩"的必要性已经凸显出来。随着现代诗歌的发展,有效引进现象学中的"意向性"概念,通过对"我思"和"反思"的精神分析和心理机制研究可以拓展现代诗歌在历史观方面的认识论研究路径。

    Abstract:

    In the history of Western epistemology, there have been three influential actions of in defense of poetry, which all involve the social function of poetry and explain the relationship between poetry and history in different degrees. The action of in defense of poetry did not happen in the history of Chinese literature, the main reason is that there has always been a cultural tradition of a fusion of poetry and history in ancient China, the relationship between poetry and history is very close, and poetry has always had a high status in Chinese history, there is no need to defend poetry. The development process of modern Chinese poetry is very tortuous and changeable, which contains the discussion of the relationship between modern Chinese poetry and history, and the relationship between modern Chinese poetry and history shows different faces in different historical periods. During the stage of occurrence of modern poetry in the 1920s, Guo Moruo and Li Jinfa imitated Western romanticism and symbolism poetry by integrating modern science and technology elements and learning from the western deep psychological mechanism, respectively, which opened the curtain of epistemology of Chinese modern poetry. In the 1930s, Bian Zhilin, as the representative of the combination of Western symbolism and Chinese classical poetry, combined the ancient and European comparative thinking between China and the West to further promote the epistemology. In the 1940s, Mu Dan and Feng Zhi pushed the epistemology of modern poetry to a new height from the combination of subconscious and Buddhist epistemology and the combination of body aesthetics and deep aesthetic psychology. Since the 1980s, Chinese modern poetry criticism has realized the importance of the historical view of modern poetry. Chen Chao and Geng Zhanchun put forward the paths of individual-historical rhetoric and different writing respectively, and explored the realistic historical view of contemporary poetry for contemporary poetry criticism from the perspective of history and the present. How to distinguish and define the relationship between modern poetry and history has come out. With the separation between contemporary poetry creation and poetry criticism and the improvement of poetic epistemology, the necessity of in defense of poetry has been highlighted. With the development of modern poetry, the concept of intentionality in phenomenology is effectively introduced, and the research of psychoanalysis and psychological mechanism of cogito and reflection can expand the epistemological research path of modern poetry in the view of history.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵东.为诗一辩:基于认识论视角下的中国现代诗歌历史观[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(5):183-192. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. rw.2024.09.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码