人大区域协同立法的理论基础与实践优化
作者:
中图分类号:

D921;D622;D624

基金项目:

十九届六中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“发挥人民代表大会制度的根本政治制度作用研究”(22ZD068)


Theoretical basis and practical optimization of regional cooperative legislation by local people’s congresses
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    党的二十届三中全会明确提出,要探索区域协同立法。人大区域协同立法是新时代深入实施区域协调发展战略的重要制度创新。《中华人民共和国宪法》中虽未明确使用“区域协同立法”的概念,但是从其序言和总纲中解读出的“区域协调发展”国家保障义务可以为人大区域协同立法提供合宪性基础。中央立法及时回应实践之需,2022年《中华人民共和国地方各级人民代表大会和地方各级人民政府组织法》修正、2023年《中华人民共和国立法法》修正,增加相关条款,为人大区域协同立法提供了概括性的合法性依据。大量相关政策文件的出台以及跨域事务高质效处理的现实需要,也为人大区域协同立法实践图景的展开提供了充分的依据。人大区域协同立法的理论基础在合宪性、合法性、合政策性、事实性等维度得以证成。在实践层面,人大区域协同立法既充分挖掘了地方立法的创新潜力,也不可避免在可操作性法律依据不足的情形下形成了实然困境,面临模式凝练不足、对“协同性”存在双向理解偏差、立法成果实效发挥刚性不足等问题。究其成因,主要在于地方人大之间实质地位不平等、立法过程公众参与不充分、协同立法机制不完善等方面,本质原因在于区域与地方、地方与地方之间的利益关系存在张力。需要通过引入“新区域主义”视角,打破传统的区域和层级观念,推动地方之间以合作为基础形成互惠的关系模型,在人大区域协同立法中建立区域整体利益观,超越地方利益寻求立法共识。在理念优化的基础上,以理性商谈作为基本方法,权衡地方人大之间的利益。将深化公众参与作为重点,在公众参与意识、参与能力、参与方式、参与程度等方面强化公众在人大区域协同立法中的多层次参与,寻求各类主体利益诉求中的最大公约数,切实解决区域公共问题。机制层面,要寻求运行机制与保障机制整体系统性完善,在运行机制中,明确人大区域协同立法的流程,在立法的“前”“中”“后”各个环节体现“协同性”,防止人大区域协同立法沦为形式;在保障机制中,通过优化多层次的联席会议制度、搭建常态化的信息交流平台、探索建立利益补偿机制、衔接绩效考核机制等方式,为切实发挥人大区域协同立法功能提供保障。

    Abstract:

    The third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee clearly stated that,regional cooperative legislation should be explored.Regional cooperative legislation is an important institutional innovation for the in-depth implementation of the strategy of coordinated regional development in the new era. Although the text of the Constitution does not explicitly use the concept of regional cooperative legislation, the obligation of the state to guarantee coordinated regional development, as interpreted in its preamble and general programme, can provide a constitutional basis for regional cooperative legislation. Central legislation has responded to the needs of practice timely, with amendments to the Organic Law of Local People’s Congresses and Local People’s Governments in 2022 and to the Legislation Law in 2023, which added relevant provisions and provided a general legality basis for regional cooperative legislation. A large number of policy documents, as well as the practical need for high-quality and efficient handling of cross-regional affairs, have also provided sufficient basis for the practice of regional cooperative legislation. The theoretical basis of regional cooperative legislation has been proved in the dimensions of constitutionality, legality, compatibility with policy and factuality. In practice, regional cooperative legislation by local people’s congresses not only fully exploit the innovation potential of local legislation, but also inevitably face a real dilemma in the case of insufficient operational legal basis, faced with insufficient modelling, understanding bias of cooperation, and insufficient rigidity in the effectiveness of legislative achievements. The reasons lie mainly in the unequal substantive status of local people’s congresses, insufficient public participation in the legislative process, and imperfect mechanisms for cooperative legislation. And the essential reason lies in the game of interests. It is necessary to break the traditional regional and hierarchical concepts by introducing the perspective of new regionalism, to promote the formation of a mutually beneficial relationship model between localities on the basis of cooperation, to establish a regional view of overall interests in regional cooperative legislation, and to seek a legislation consensus beyond local interests. On the basis of conceptual optimization, rational negotiation is used as the basic method to weigh the interests of local people’s congresses. The deepening of public participation is taken as a priority, and the multi-level participation of the public in regional cooperative legislation is strengthened in terms of public participation awareness, participation capacity, participation mode and participation degree, so as to seek the greatest common denominator among the interests of various subjects and effectively solve regional public problems. At the mechanism level, it seeks to improve the overall systematic improvement of the operation mechanism and safeguard mechanism. In the operation mechanism, the process should be clearly defined, and cooperation should be reflected in all process of the legislation, so as to prevent it from being reduced to a mere formality. In the safeguard mechanism, through optimizing the multi-level joint meeting system, setting up a regular information exchange platform, exploring the establishment of a compensation mechanism for benefits, and linking up the performance assessment mechanism, safeguards have been provided to ensure the function of regional cooperative legislation.

    参考文献
    [1] 朱福惠,龚进之.宪法序言的特殊功能及其法律效力[J].江苏行政学院学报,2017(1):123-129.
    [2] 李海平.区域协调发展的国家保障义务[J].中国社会科学,2022(4):44-63.
    [3] 张震.区域协调发展的宪法逻辑与制度完善建议[J].法学杂志,2022(3):28-40.
    [4] 刘东亮,郑春燕.宪法基本国策研究[J].西南政法大学学报,2000(1):99-102.
    [5] 殷啸虎.对我国宪法政策性条款功能与效力的思考[J].政治与法律,2019(8):17-25.
    [6] 李龙,李慧敏.政策与法律的互补谐变关系探析[J].理论与改革,2017(1):54-58.
    [7] 秦鹏,刘焕.成渝地区双城经济圈协同发展的理论逻辑与路径探索:基于功能主义理论的视角[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021(2):44-54.
    [8] 王佃利.跨域治理:城市群协同发展研究[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2018:25-26.
    [9] 吕宁.区域协同立法的功能定位和模式选择[J].湖南警察学院学报,2021(2):50-57.
    [10] 朱最新.区域协同立法的运行模式与制度保障[J].政法论丛,2022(4):141-150.
    [11] 朱正余,宋智敏.长株潭都市圈协同立法的实践路径思考[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022(4):31-38.
    [12] 金太军.从行政区行政到区域公共管理:政府治理形态嬗变的博弈分析[J].中国社会科学,2007(6):53-65,205.
    [13] 刘军宁,王炎,贺卫方.市场社会与公共秩序[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996:341.
    [14] 何显明.市场化进程中的地方政府行为逻辑[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:203.
    [15] 罗俊杰,易凌.区域协同立法博弈分析[J].时代法学,2009(2):45-49.
    [16] 彭彦强.中国地方政府合作研究:基于行政权力分析的视角[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2013:92.
    [17] 陈安国.城市区域合作[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010:4.
    [18] 乔.B.斯蒂文斯.集体选择经济学[M],杨晓维,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003:122-123.
    [19] 何俊志.中国地方人大的三重属性与变迁模式[J].政治学研究,2016(5):59-69.
    [20] 宋保振,陈金钊.区域协同立法模式探究:以长三角为例[J].江海学刊,2019(6):165-171.
    [21] 于立深.行政立法过程的利益表达、意见沟通和整合[J].当代法学,2004(2):25-39.
    [22] 冯玉军.区域协同立法理论与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2019:60.
    [23] 陶希东.中国跨界区域管理理论与实践探[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2010:38.
    [24] 吴超,魏清泉."新区域主义"与我国的区域协调发展[J].经济地理,2004(1):2-7.
    [25] 谢丽华.新区域主义流派及对我国区域经济发展的启示[J].经济论坛,2010(1):93-95.
    [26] 张文显.法哲学范畴研究[M].修订版.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:220.
    [27] 付子堂.法律功能论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:89.
    [28] 陈雯,孙伟,袁丰.长江三角洲区域一体化空间:合作、分工与差异[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018:139-140.
    [29] 吕寿伟.团结的教育生活与公民公共心灵的培育[J].高等教育研究,2015(5):13-19.
    [30] 阿图尔·考夫曼.后现代法哲学-告别演讲[M],米健,译.北京:法律出版社,2000:30-39.
    [31] 陈弘毅.法治、启蒙与现代法的精神[M].2版.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:47.
    [32] 吴兴国.论我国公众参与地方立法的完善路径[J].江西社会科学,2013(7):155-159.
    [33] 顾爱平.公众参与地方立法的困境与对策[J].江苏社会科学,2017(6):106-11.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘婕妤.人大区域协同立法的理论基础与实践优化[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(6):225-237. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2024.01.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:144
  • 下载次数: 129
  • HTML阅读次数: 216
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-13
文章二维码