新质生产力背景下数字金融服务实体经济的效应与机制研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 山东工商学院 会计学院,山东 烟台 264005;2. 青岛大学 商学院,山东 青岛 266071;3. 日照银行,山东 日照 276800;4. 济南大学 计划财务处,山东 济南 250024

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F832.0

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“双碳目标下数据驱动制造业绿色转型的机理、路径与对策研究”(22BJY227);山东省社会科学规划研究项目“新旧动能转换背景下基于会计信息视角的制造业生态效率提升路径研究”(18CKJJ03)


Research on the effects and mechanisms of digital finance serving for the real economy in the context of new quality productive forces
Author:
Affiliation:

1. School of Accounting, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai264005, P. R. China;2. Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao266071, P. R. China;3. Bank of Rizhao, Rizhao276800, P. R. China;4. Department of Planning and Finance, University of Jinan, Jinan250024, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    新质生产力为金融数字化变革和经济转型升级带来了新的契机,金融发展与经济增长的关系这个古老课题也愈发历久弥新。在结合数字普惠金融指数与商业银行数字化转型指数的基础上对省域数字金融发展水平进行全新计量,基于2011—2021年我国31个省份的面板数据,运用门槛模型实证检验了数字金融发展对实体经济的作用效果。研究发现:第一,数字金融对实体经济的影响存在双门槛非线性关系的特征。数字金融发展水平在小于第一门槛值时能够强烈而显著地促进实体经济增长,当上升至第一与第二门槛值之间时发挥显著的抑制作用,在跨越第二门槛值后数字金融的抑制作用进一步衰减,但仍保持显著。第二,地区异质性分析表明东部、中部、西部地区数字金融对实体经济的影响均呈现单门槛特征,但作用效果有所区别;东部地区的数字金融在门槛值两侧均显著抑制实体经济增长,且抑制作用在越过门槛值后发生衰减;中部地区的数字金融在小于门槛值时对实体经济发挥显著促进作用而大于门槛值时却发挥显著抑制作用;西部地区的数字金融在小于门槛值时对实体经济具有显著抑制作用,大于门槛值时抑制作用不显著。第三,新质生产力理论分别从资本配置、科技创新、劳动供给三个维度揭示了实体经济增长的内在动力源泉。基于新质生产力理论的机制检验显示资本配置效率和劳动生产率在数字金融与实体经济之间发挥了中介传导效应,科技创新效率不具有中介效应。研究为数字金融发展战略调整、数字金融服务实体经济的路径选择提供了理论依据,对引导数字金融与实体经济协调发展和推动新质生产力发展具有政策启示意义。

    Abstract:

    New quality productive forces bring new opportunities for financial digital transformation and economic upgrading. The age-old topic of the relationship between financial development and economic growth is becoming more and more time-honoured. Based on the combination of the Digital Inclusive Finance Index and the Digital Transformation Index of Commercial Banks, a new measurement of the development level of provincial digital finance is conducted. Furthermore, based on the panel data of 31 provinces in the mainland of China from 2011 to 2021, the effect of digital financial development on the real economy is empirically examined using the threshold model. The study finds that: Firstly, the impact of digital finance on the real economy is characterized by a two-threshold non-linear relationship. The level of digital finance development can strongly and significantly promote real economic growth when it is less than the first threshold, play a significant inhibiting role when it rises between the first and second thresholds, and the inhibiting role of digital finance further attenuates after the second threshold is crossed, but still remains significant; Secondly, the regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of digital finance on the real economy in the eastern, central and western regions all show single-threshold characteristics, but with different effects. Digital finance in the eastern region significantly inhibits real economic growth on both sides of the threshold, and the inhibiting effect decays after crossing the threshold. Digital finance in the central region has a significant facilitating effect on the real economy when it is less than the threshold and a significant inhibiting effect when it is greater than the threshold. In the western region, digital finance has a significant inhibiting effect on the real economy when it is less than the threshold and a non-significant inhibiting effect when it is greater than the threshold; Thirdly, new quality productive forces theory reveals the intrinsic power source of real economic growth from the three dimensions of capital allocation, scientific and technological innovation, and labour supply respectively. Mechanism tests based on new quality productive forces theory show that capital allocation efficiency and labour productivity play an intermediary transmission effect, but technological innovation efficiency does not have an intermediary effect. The study provides a theoretical basis for the adjustment of digital financial development strategy and the choice of path for digital financial services to the real economy, and is of policy revelation significance in guiding the coordinated development of digital finance and the real economy and promoting the development of new quality productive forces.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

惠楠,王欣,李金克.新质生产力背景下数字金融服务实体经济的效应与机制研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(2):17-34. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2024.11.005

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码