数字经济赋能新质生产力发展的内在机理与提升路径研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.安庆师范大学 经济与管理学院,安徽 安庆 246133;2.河北经贸大学 经济学院,河北 石家庄 050061

作者简介:

余卫,安庆师范大学经济与管理学院讲师,硕士研究生导师,Email:davieyu@126.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F49;F124

基金项目:

安徽省高校科研重点项目“新质生产力统计测度理论与应用研究”(2024AH052750);国家社会科学基金项目“多元利益视角下农地细碎化协同治理机制研究”(23BGL264);河南省软科学项目“乡村振兴视域下河南省城乡‘数字鸿沟’的成因、特征与弥合机制研究”(242400410042)


Research on the internal mechanism and improvement path of digital economy empowering the development of new quality productivity
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics and Management, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, P. R. China;2.School of Economics, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    新质生产力已经在实践中形成并展示出对高质量发展的强劲推动力、支撑力,而数字经济的快速发展为生产力的蝶变跃升提供了技术支持和产业根基,成为培育新质生产力的核心动能。因此,厘清数字经济作用于新质生产力的内在机理,探究二者之间的逻辑关联,对于因地制宜发展新质生产力、推动经济社会高质量发展具有重要意义。文章基于2012—2021年全国30个省份的面板数据,以马克思主义生产力理论为指导,紧紧围绕新质生产力的核心内涵,从新质劳动者、新质劳动对象和新质劳动资料三个维度构建测度新质生产力发展水平的评价指标体系,深入探究了数字经济对新质生产力发展的影响效应和作用机制。研究发现:数字经济对新质生产力具有显著正向的促进作用,这一结论经过内生性及稳健性检验后依然成立;异质性检验结果表明,数字经济对新质生产力的赋能作用在我国东中西部均有效,且在西部地区表现出更为强劲的赋能作用,但是在东北地区并不显著,可能是由于东北地区数字基础设施相对薄弱、人口外流、产业转型缓慢等原因造成的;机制检验结果显示,数字经济可以通过加速市场化改革进程和推动产业结构高级化两条路径促进新质生产力发展;门槛效应揭示,数字经济对新质生产力发展的影响并不是线性的,而是存在着明显的门槛效应,且随着数字经济发展水平的提升而显著增强。据此,文章提出要大力发展数字经济,为培育新质生产力提供坚实的技术支撑和创新动能;要加快市场化改革进程,为新质生产力的培育提供良好的营商环境和制度保障;要加快产业结构优化调整,为新质生产力的培育提供稳固的产业根基和平台效能。从学理角度而言,文章搭建了数字经济与新质生产力有机关联的互动分析框架,回应了众多学者提出的二者实证分析不足的研究缺憾;从实践角度而言,文章提出的政策建议能够更加充分发挥数字经济的独特效能,为推动新质生产力加快形成提供参考借鉴。

    Abstract:

    New quality productivity has formed and demonstrated in practice as a strong driving force and support for high-quality development, and the rapid development of the digital economy has provided technical support and industrial foundation for the leap of productivity, becoming the core driving force for cultivating new quality productivity. Therefore, clarifying the internal mechanism of the role of digital economy in new quality productivity and exploring the logical relationship between the two are of great significance for developing new quality productivity according to local conditions and promoting high-quality economic and social development. The article is based on panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2021, guided by Marxist productivity theory, and closely focused on the core connotation of new quality productivity. It constructs an evaluation index system to measure the development level of new quality productivity from three dimensions: new quality workers, new quality labor objects, and new quality labor materials, and deeply explores the impact and mechanism of digital economy on the development of new quality productivity. Research has found that: 1) Digital economy has a significant positive promoting effect on new quality productivity, and this conclusion still holds true after endogeneity and robustness tests; 2) The heterogeneity test results indicate that the empowering effect of digital economy on new quality productivity is effective in the eastern, central, and western regions of China, and shows a stronger empowering effect in the western region. However, it is not significant in the northeast region. This may be due to the relatively weak digital infrastructure, population outflow, and slow industrial transformation in the northeast region; 3) The mechanism test results show that digital economy can promote the development of new quality productivity through two paths: accelerating the process of market-oriented reform and promoting the upgrading of industrial structure; 4) The threshold effect reveals that the impact of digital economy on the development of new quality productivity is not linear, but rather has a significant threshold effect, which increases significantly with the improvement of the level of digital economy development. Based on this, the article proposes to vigorously develop digital economy, providing solid technical support and innovative momentum for cultivating new quality productivity; To accelerate the process of market-oriented reform and provide a favorable business environment and institutional guarantee for the cultivation of new quality productive forces; To accelerate the optimization and adjustment of industrial structure, and provide a solid industrial foundation and platform efficiency for the cultivation of new quality productivity. From the theoretical perspective, the article establishes an interactive analysis framework for the organic correlation between the digital economy and new quality productivity, responding to the research shortcomings raised by many scholars regarding the insufficient empirical analysis of the two; From the practical perspective, the policy recommendations proposed in the article can fully leverage the unique effectiveness of digital economy and provide reference for accelerating the formation of new quality productivity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

余卫,赵皖渝,赵彤彤.数字经济赋能新质生产力发展的内在机理与提升路径研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(3):90-104. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2024.12.002

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码